By this logic, there is no reason to stop Sephiroth since Aeris's pray for Holy would have worked. Aside from changing
a lot of Diolaouge, it would change the entire story, as well as several cut scenes. And, going by this, you obviously don't Squall very well do you?
Well actually it proubably wouldn't have changed it that much, I mean, all they'd have to do is write in another reason for Aeris's prayer being interupted. Aside from that, Aeris living really woudln't have made much of a difference.
eh. no one will have any solid proof until they talk directly to the makers in square, and i dont think thats happening any time soon. i reall dont care. i used her when i had to, and when i didnt i stripped her of her materia.
No. She was deffinitly meant to die once the game started to be prouduced through computers. Not a chance otherwise. There are numerous interviews stating this fact.
As to the original debate, Dr. Blue seems to have missed much of the point of Squall's piece. The matter was raised in the first place as a result of numerous individuals endorsing the so-called "unfinished game theory." A number of forum members had contended that Aeris had been intended to be resurrected, but that said revival had been left out the game due to time constraints. Squall's piece demonstrated that such was not the case; Aeris was never intended to be revived, and all "evidence" pointing to an incomplete resurrection event really showed nothing at all.
You know, I think I get what you mean. I didn't take into account that some people still thought there was a way to reserect her...I was just saying how in a small way, Squall was wrong.
But yes, now I know what he means.
