no people bitch about your for:
africa
the middle east
the un
globalisation
interference
agreession
Printable View
no people bitch about your for:
africa
the middle east
the un
globalisation
interference
agreession
yup, but the sad thing is they aint got no military so they cant do a damn thing about it.
so the end of the argument is that america wins cos it can oppress these people? what a great country. nazi germany and soviet russia had similar ideas. an iron fist.
What is America doing to oppress these people?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloud No.9
except from starving them and bombing them? nad supporting regimes that do the same? not a lot really...........
A) How are we starving them?
B) When did we bomb them?
C) When did we support regimes oppressing these people?
what the hell r u talkin about, why do u think were at war to stop regimes that are terrorist affiliated.ohh yeah were bombing and starving them wev'e done more than ur little scotland could ever imagine doing for other countries.
[leeza]*snip*
This post was not necessary. ~ Leeza[/leeza]
starving with trade subsides, debt and lack of aid in third world disasters and crisis's
bombing them, iraq, afghanistan, before in somalia, sudan, libya,
supprting those who do it. israel, russia, zimbabwe, egypt, turkey, uzbekistan.
hello were liberating iraq freeing them from the tyrant sudammmmmmm!!!!!!
of course were bombing them were at WAR with them. the point is wev'e helped al ot of people or countries.y dont u guys do somethin?????
we did. we fought in iraq, afghanistan, bosnia, falkands, korea, burma, israel back in the UN held days.
why not free zimbabwe? uzbekistan? north korea? burma? nepal? sudan? lacking in something?
So, by not letting them have our food cheap, we're starving them. Go teach them how to grow their own.Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloud No.9
Actually, the ones oppressing them there are their own governments, not the US. Besides it's a WAR. You don't fight those by handing out flowers.
Wow, supporting Israel, who is simply trying to hold it's own territory against a group of insurgents trying to kill them is supporting opression. You're a deluded fool.
And you still haven't said where you're from, so don't bitch at me for getting it wrong anymore.
what r u tryin to say WERE JUST IN IT FOR THE DAMN OIL???????? ill have u know we have plenty of reserve oil in Alaska, and wev'e been using some. were over there cuz of terrorists. GOT THAT.
oh and skyblade hes from scotland, or the UK
That's correct, but you see, I'm not saying "OH BUSH KNEW BLAME HIM FOR IT!" or "ITS GOD'S WRATH FOR GAY PEOPLE! BLAME THE GAYS!" or "THE GOVERNMENT JUST PROLONGED HELP BECAUSE OF THE HIGH BLACK POPULATION IN THE AREA! THE GOVERNMENT IS EVIL!"Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloud No.9
My point isn't "Oh I'm better than you because I'm helping and you aren't." but rather "If you're going to do something shut the hell up and act. Bitching all day isn't going to do anything but further hurt people emotionally."
i'm scottish if you need to know.
actually that's now what subsidies do. they pay farmers for production not selling those producing artificially cheap food. xheaper than what can be produced in africa (where it would actually be cheaper if subisidies were removed). this puts african farmers out of jobs. no farmers = no food. on top of that are trade tarriffs preventing exports.
jerusalem, the west bank and the gaza strip are conquered jewish lands taken after the pre-emptive 6 day war. shelling refugge camps isn't a nice thing to do.
actually iraq is about land location and iran.
and before we started bombing them thee were no terrorits in iraq. al-qaeda had declared a jihad on the secualr state. had offered to defend saudi from it. had offered iran support as wel. they were not best friends.