Yeah, at least Vick has a defense to back him up.
Printable View
Yeah, at least Vick has a defense to back him up.
Vick is a speed RB who throws the ball sometimes, and he does that pretty well, but with the team down by 7 and a minute to go I would not want the game in his hands.
Yeah, I just noticed this thread. 42-19 Giants over Arizona. Ouch.
Yeah, and the Giants aren't even that good. Arizona just sucks. Arizona, Cleveland, and Tennessee are the teams I'd rank at the very bottom of the list.
I think Detroit's D might suprise a few people. Then again, it might not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raistlin
xD
Detroit doesn't exactly have a miserable D, but it's not the most consistent in the world. I'll wait a few weeks before I say anything more definite, though.
i'd say that vick has a fairly good line-up to work with. Decent enough WR's and even I will admit that Dunn ran a good game against us. Ultimately I think it's hard to take Vick seriously as a QB because of his running and jumping around. When you see a solid QB like brady or Manning then he seems like he could be a HB.
Peace out and :rock:
EE
I like the running duo of Dunn and Duckett. That and the defense is how they win games.
It's the DDDV style that helps Atlanta win:
Dunn, Duckett, Defense, and Vick-not-throwing-too-much.
not to mention our star kicker missing two field goals.
Peace out and :rock:
EE
From 49 yards. 50 yards is no gimme for anyone, even Akers.
When he finally got a chance within 45 yards (I think it was 44, actually), he nailed it right between the posts. Akers is still good.
the Falcons have horrible WR. Crumpler is their best receiver and he's not that good at catching balls, and he's a TE.
Well, this is ugly.
What Chicago killing detroit :D?
Philly killing my 49ers.