http://uk.faqs.ign.com/articles/698/698416p1.html
There you go. Once more, the ultimate counter to all of your post. ;)
Printable View
http://uk.faqs.ign.com/articles/698/698416p1.html
There you go. Once more, the ultimate counter to all of your post. ;)
You do realize that the UOG was written and published before the release of Advent Children? Yeah, just a reather HUGE fact there.
Which has got to do what with your post, which is 95% focused on FFVII? :)
A lot...duh. Go back to page 1 and I believe my third post. You seemed to have missed 3/4 of it. I know it's not all my own work, but I've discussed it with the person thoroughly and it makes the most sense, our combined ideas.
You still don't understand do you? Why in the world should I, or anyone else for that matter, throw our own experiences of the game down the drain, ignore constant reinforcements and evidence of Sephiroth and his control over Jenova, ignore official guides which are published by Square and feature interviews with the team-members, a guide which you slander and call unofficial and unbelievable ... and listen to your unofficial theory? What in the world grants you the right to say that you are right, that 95% of every other FFVII fan and Square Enix themselves, are wrong?
Just answer me that why don't you?
No one is saying that at all, but you are blinded by some naive view that EVERYTHING you read in an article or on a webpage is the truth!
Published by Square? Maybe. WRITTEN by Square? Not necessarily.
Publish does not equal written by. (Example: Any book in a library)
Even if it was written by Square, written by a lead writer of FF7? Again, not necessarily true.
The only -ONLY- person who knows the truth is the ORIGINAL writer. So, please don't insult my intelligence again by linking AGAIN to a guide which provides no genuine authenticity as to who endorsed it.
Thank you.
You're quite right, I am insulting your intelligence, because yet again, the meaning of my post goes right over your head. What backing does anything that you or Forsaken have said, come from? Nothing even remotely official, that's for sure. ;)
CAN U NOT READ?!?!!?!?!?!?
I have said that already, I have said that our view has no backing from "official" sources! But you have not answered my question! How can u be so sure ur interviews are genuine?
To add to this, I notice that this guide is a translation by the writer himself. We have all seen how absurd some translation ends up (Zero Wing springs to mind) yet you claim that he is perfect in everything he says?
Further Edit Point: At the end of the guide, Kitase is interviewed involving links between 7 and 10 / 10-2. Now, how can you be sure he has not gone with the Dominant Sephiroth thing to leave open to him a later storyline involving a link between the two, which would surely rake in MILLIONS?
Hehe. That's because you never stated a question. ;) Now that you have, perhaps I can answer.Quote:
Originally Posted by gyaku_zuki
Listen. The guide, and all following guides that came after, are published by Square. The also contain interviews from the team members themselves. If that does not add authenticity or any sense of genuine status to these, I don't know what does.
It's funny. I don't see anyone attacking the authenticity of the FFVIII, IX, X, or the X-2 guides? But of course your attacking the FFVII one as it directly provides proof of events, and goes against everything that you guys have said...
Really? What constant reinforcement of Sephiroth controlling Jenova did you see in the game? Tell me, please.Quote:
Why in the world should I, or anyone else for that matter, throw our own experiences of the game down the drain, ignore constant reinforcements and evidence of Sephiroth and his control over Jenova,
Yeah, but again, not written by the team-members, nor said anywhere that it is endorsedy by them. SQUARE owns Final FantasY VII and anything to relate with it. Kitase does not and if Square says "you approve of this" you do. I respect Kitase immensely for what he created in FFVII, but I KNOW for a fact that the game is what he envisioned and created. The guide is just published by the company the man works for. In a sense, one is far more reliable than the other.Quote:
ignore official guides which are published by Square and feature interviews with the team-members
You seem to think you are in the majority by a significant margin... I don't think so and I don't know if you can back up your claim. I won't dispute that a lot of people do think Sephiroth was in control, but how many of said people would be willing to paw through the game and write an entire essay on it? Do these fans even write or speak coherently and not use chatspeak? I wrote my idea and theory based on what I found in the game and LOGICAL REASONING. I don't think one can dispute logic.Quote:
What in the world grants you the right to say that you are right, that 95% of every other FFVII fan and Square Enix themselves, are wrong?
I am not interested in FFIX or any of the others at the moment. Also, where is this "proof?" As far as I read, the UOG just SAYS Sephiroth was in control. No explanation.Quote:
It's funny. I don't see anyone attacking the authenticity of the FFVIII, IX, X, or the X-2 guides? But of course your attacking the FFVII one as it directly provides proof of events, and goes against everything that you guys have said...
Logic based on flawed interpretations of 'evidence' and events, is still flawed logic. :)
The explanations are throughout the entire guide. You obviously didn't read it...Quote:
Originally Posted by Forsaken Lover
Okay, then. Point out how my logic and interpreations are flawed. If you can disprove my essay, I'll shut up and admit it's flawed logic. If not, I will keep advocating it.
I already did provide counters to your earlier posts, but you aren't going to admit anything, and I certaintly aren't taking what you're coming up with as gold over official sources and what I know.
So, like I said a while back, that will just have to be left at that. :)
Okay guys, let's not get personal here.
I'll admit I'm wrong when someone shows me I'm wrong by pointing out how my essay is completely invalid. Until then, I guess that is that.