They are merely analogies, the point remains the same. :D And anyone who knows me knows that my analogies don't get more and more sensible, they get more and more extreme!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirage
Printable View
They are merely analogies, the point remains the same. :D And anyone who knows me knows that my analogies don't get more and more sensible, they get more and more extreme!Quote:
Originally Posted by Mirage
So what you just take the cubicles out of the bathrooms and still have the loo there? Well then it would be unpleasant but w/e. Deal with it. Don't use public bathrooms.
Yeah. If you don't like noncubicled public restrooms, go somewhere else.
Sort of like "if you don't like swearing, listen to someone else".
At the same time if someone is swearing at the top of their voice and the whole world can hear them I will punch them for being obnoxious and then continue to go elsewhere
Yes. I like to perform acts of violence on people who practice their free speech too. We should hang out.
Freedom of speech doesn't mean speech without social repercussions. Punches to the throat are a manifestation of those repercussions.
Sounds more like battery to me. However, the offended person instead stopped talking to the person, or told their friends that the person was an unlikable guy, that's more of a social reprecussion.
They can't talk if I punch them in the throat so I think it would be seen as social justice.