More than slightly.
Printable View
More than slightly.
Yeah, so that doesn't count. xD
I mean, I could post a picture of Pa Ingalls for us to all drool over, but he's a smurfing pioneer. xD
In current times, suspenders make you look like a tit. Unless, as someone pointed out, it's in a business setting. Which is why Guy Two looks decent.
Suspenders are for the poised and those with class. You people wouldn't understand.
Please be kind to Pontus and don't force him to wear them. :(
He dresses himself. I can't help it if I slip some into his unmentionables drawer, though.
They're just so thoroughly unmanly.
At least the way skinny, weird hipsters wear them these days.
http://marshallmatlock.com/wp-conten...%20glasses.png
Arguments against suspenders is invalid.
As a male, if at any point during your fashion dilemmas you find yourself wondering "Would Don Draper wear this?" and the answer is "yes," then you're doing it right.
Well, I was going to mention the whole 1960s look.
But how many guys who look like that wear suspenders? Especially compared in number to the type of guy you posted in the first post?
Since any number I would come up with would be pulled out of me ass, I can't really answer that, can I?
Pulled out of your ass?Quote:
Originally Posted by Shorty
Pull your pants up!
Wear some suspenders.
;)
Suspenders are for boys.
Unless, like nearly the entire Earth's population, you can't pull off suspenders or a fedora. So I disagree.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shorty
Jump off suspenders' dick, Sarah.
There are people who actually defend suspenders?
This is news to me.
90% of images depicting lumberjacks involve suspenders