Printable View
I dont think he did it.. i was molested as a child and the way this boy acts about it.. its just pretty obvious hes fakin it. HE probably got hella drugged up and had sex with one of the other boys there and the only explanation he can think of is he was "molested" .. the kid is obviously gay too !
Everyone reacts to molestation differently. No one had any idea I was molested, and I still act like it's no big deal, make jokes about it and so on.
I'm not saying whether I believe the accuser or not, but I dont think it's fair to say he's lying because he isnt 'acting the right way'.
*sigh* there obviously is no right reaction but his current reaction isnt even close..
not to mention i dont think Jackson would be stupid enuf to molest another kid...! You would literally have to be the stupidest person on the planet... >.< Especially when ur in the public eyes like Jackson.
its crap Jacko did do it a few times but not that many times he maybe ugly but he should have common sense to know what hes doing is wrong and he is losing money and fame for it
Says who? Says you? There's no 'right' or 'wrong' way. Everyone deals with and copes with things in a different way. Some in ways others cant even comprehend. So dont judge him because you dont think it's the right reaction.
Not to mention the circumstances for him are very different, considering his health and the various goings-on in his life.
I'm not saying whether it happened or not, but I dont think it's fair to judge him because his reaction isnt 'right'.
its quite likely hes done it a few times by few i mean 5 or less Jacko has common sense i think so he knows he should stop and getting accused by fakers and liars aint doing good evetually all Jacko+molestation accusations will be ignored coz of the hi ammounts
I'm not arguing with anyone whether he did it or not. It's a ridiculous argument, because the only people that know the truth of that are Jackson and the people he has/hasnt molested. No amount of logic or reasoning on our part can figure out whether he did or he didnt, especially with all the very strong bias' running around in this thread.
the judges have to snap into reality and see that theres too many molestation cases for them to be true
Not neccesarily. It's like saying "There's too many murders this guy has been accused of, they cant be true." Do you know the statistics of child molestation? How many one person can molest?
Yes, given Jackon's fame and fortune and his nature to be around children, it leaves it open for him to be falsley accused. But they cant write off every instance as an attempt at exploitation. That's what the trial is for, to deem if the accuser is telling the truth or not/
good point
I don't think he did anything. I got into this thread a little late but I personally feel that these "sleepovers" Jackson had with these kids are an attempt by Jackson to correct his own childhood. He had a very bad childhood, and his father was not very "nice" to him. I think that by treating children very nicely he is trying to be the father that he never had.
you can tell.. otherwise a jury or judge wouldnt be hired... dur! people can tell if people lie.. or in our system are supposed to. and ur right there is not "right" or "wrong" way but i believe that this kid is lying because the way hes acting, i dont think having cancer will change the way you react to someone who raped you... i think hed atleast cry a bit more WOULDNT U, instead he sits there and is trying to make a case, to me thats what i look like when i lie, so i think hes lying.Quote:
I'm not arguing with anyone whether he did it or not. It's a ridiculous argument, because the only people that know the truth of that are Jackson and the people he has/hasnt molested. No amount of logic or reasoning on our part can figure out whether he did or he didnt, especially with all the very strong bias' running around in this thread.
I dont think Jackson actually ever molested a kid, just ask mucculey culkin ;)
On our part, genius. We havent gotten the same info as the jury or judges has. We havent sat and watched the trial. We havent been privy to all the evidence. We are not in the court room.
Would I? No, I wouldnt. I have never cried in front of anyone concerning my molestation, even while talking about it. That's how I deal with things. I very rarely cry in front of others, and usually only over sad movies and the like. No one has ever or will ever see me cry as I speak about being molested, even if the man who did it was right there in the room.
well maybe UR not watching the trial but i am... :P
and its sad you wont cry.. *pat* but being put on a stage thingy where u have to tell people what happened and stuff.. thats definitely CRY worthy
not trying to say ur wrong... but ive been keepin up on this stuff and the kid just isnt coming across to ME as honest. His whole family's testimonies have been kinda shaky.
How can you watch it though? I thought there were no cameras allowed in the courtroom?
Now again, I'm not denying he's lying or whatever. I think any parents who let their child stay at the home of an accused child molester are stupid and potentially money-mongers, but again, I dont think his reactions are a 100% clue. There's a lot of heavy bias in this thread, because it's hard to imagine someone people like and admire to possibly be a child molester.