Printable View
That was the gil sellers and obvious cheaters that ruined it.Quote:
Originally Posted by squareSOFT
11 is probably the best, considering it's all the players choice on what to do. They just have to get rid of the cheaters first.
Cheating on a game ON YOUR OWN is one thing, but online is a different story. In a game, your goal is not to be the best, but to have fun playing it. and if you have fun cheating, then you're hopeless.
Mabe, i'm not really a fan of MMORPG's to begin with but I do think that even with the gil-sellers and such it's still not up to their usual standard. Its just to non-linear and repetative. Kinda like runescape with better graphics. And please dont be insinuating that i'm a cheater...
I-Didn't play would love to
II-Again (#1)
III-i loved it, but i didn't beat it cause the bloody game lost my data
IV-(#I,II)
V-(I,II,IV)
VI-isn't this just a different version of III??
VII-best game i've ever played and i think most ff fans agree (notice that storyline beats graphics)
VIII-great storyline good graphics (for its time) bad battle sytem (needed more physical attacking and the gf animations got a little old after the first boss)
IX-Great story and gameplay i loved it
X-Decent story line decent gameplay needs a world map and what's up with an airship that you can't actually fly around!! needs a more manly main character, and a cooler villian (i mean what exactly was SIN??)
X-2-honestly this game was ridiculous!! my girlfreind made fun of me for playing it and i couldn't argue with her. It opens with a MUSIC VIDEO and has DRESS spheres and an all girl cast this was the worst game i have ever played, and the main character didn't have a sword. i thought it was really dumb and the bottom of the ff series that being said it was still an ff and that means that it had to have good points and i am happy that some people found it good
summary: VII was the climax and it goes down from there. Apparently everyone got obssed with graphics and making games more "modern" that they left out the storyline but FF is still FF and that makes any game in the series a good RPG
That's funny, you say FFVII was the climax and you haven't played basically any of the ones before it. FFVI was not a different version of III, it was originally released as III in the US. (which makes me wonder if you played FFIII, which has onion kids, or FFVI, the one with espers)Quote:
Originally Posted by biff0465
I don't know what to say, because some people enjoy the newer ones more than the older ones, some people love XI. Then there are others who only love the classic ones. IT's all the persons opinion, but FF will not die as long as people buy and play the games and enjoy them...
THE JACKEL
I was'nt. I was just putting a point out. What I meant by 'you', was 'anyone'. Meaning, 'anyone who cheats for fun is hopeless.'Quote:
Originally Posted by squareSOFT
I dont think theres any specified way to play that game. You just play it the way you most enjoy.Quote:
I was'nt. I was just putting a point out. What I meant by 'you', was 'anyone'. Meaning, 'anyone who cheats for fun is hopeless.'
Meh. I guess my only choice is to leave the power-hungry to themselves.Quote:
Originally Posted by Destai
(not saying anyone here is, just to get that straight)
Thats the problem. Its far to non-linear. Final fantasies are known for gripping storylines and memorable characters and in this one you dont have any of thoseQuote:
Originally Posted by Destai
It is a MMORPG. You play it in any order you want. Meaning you're really making your own story. Meaning you don't have to do the quests you don't want to do, you can choose your race, job...Quote:
Originally Posted by squareSOFT
With all due respect, it's good Square did'nt make a storyline they could POSSIBLY mess up. Not saying they would, but there would always be a chance of them making a mistake like X-2, IMO.
You can do mission for your country. I'd hardly call that a gripping storyline. Not no mention your character has no individual personality. Not that you can really have anything different in a MMORPG, which is why I think square should just get back to what made final fantasies good in the first place
Must you continue to be so negative? Sure, a couple of their games may not have been the best of the best, but we can't know if any of their newer games are going to be good until we play them.Quote:
Originally Posted by squareSOFT
If you wish, you can stop playing the newer games, and just continue to play your favorites. I'm not stopping you.
you are right that i can't judge the climax without playing the earlier ones so i withdraw that comment. (i am working on getting them somehow (i.e. fforigins chronicles etc.) so someone explain the whole FFIII vs. FFVI to me i played FFIII for the snesQuote:
Originally Posted by ljkkjlcm9
Whoa overreacting!!!! All i'm saying is that x-2 was horrible and I dont like MMORPG's in general. FFxii sounds AMAZING and my personal favourite was x. I like some of their new ideas just not all of them
Have you even played FF11?Quote:
Originally Posted by squareSOFT
i do agree that X-2 was horrible, though.
Sure I have a lvl 25 blm and a 14whm. I came from Bastok and the area just outside it is called Gustaberg. I bought most of my stuff at the AH(doesn't every1) and I was part of a Linkshell who's leader was called Atraiyu. Enough?