I don't know what would make you think that but I can assure you that I am very familiar with the ins and outs of the male body.Quote:
Originally Posted by DMKA
Hehe, "ins and outs of the male body." :greenie:
Printable View
I don't know what would make you think that but I can assure you that I am very familiar with the ins and outs of the male body.Quote:
Originally Posted by DMKA
Hehe, "ins and outs of the male body." :greenie:
stop with the sex talk already. family forum remember.
What's the topic of this thread?Quote:
Originally Posted by Cloud No.9
yeah but it didn't require talk about boner's and the in's and outs of a male. if we want to start using every thread like this as an excuse to be like that then i will be the first to bring it to the next logical step.
There's nothing sexual about the inside of a male.
You're thinking about females. Not that either of those would be extreamly bad or anything.
It says "no eyes on each other for me" under your user name, not "Cid's Knight".
i did notice that. but when i feel nothing is done about such crude topics of conversation i'll do it myself. otherwise if i can beat them i'll join them and go that one step further and noone wants that.
It says in the FAQ that you shouldn't act like a mod if you're not one.
then as it appears this tone of conversation is okay. i will not act like a mod and act in the same crude way this thread is being handled.
Sex sex sexity sex.
you do know that if we continue down this road of thought about why shlupquack's crudeness should or shouldn't be allowed this thread will be closed anyway and i partially get what i want (an edit would be better). so i win either way. meh.
What?
That's enough. Rengori, if you have a problem use the warn button. What you're doing is also against the rules.
I would like everyone to get back on topic without all of the inuendos.
stupid thing won't let me delete my own posts. but that was all that was needed. thank you leeza again for being sane and well judged.
Leisure Suit Larry? Feh! Try Custer's Revenge, which came out in 1982! That was WAY worse! Actually, pretty much ANYTHING made by Mystique or Play Around was far, far worse than Leisure Suit Larry. It's the difference between Cinemax's late night skin flicks and the sorts of movies whose titles include things like "black somethings, white chicks" or words like "mouth" and "gutter" used in conjunction with each other.Quote:
Originally Posted by Not At All Reno
I wouldn't talk like that if it weren't relevant to the topic. But, thanks, Cloud, I think I'm familiar with the rules of the forum.
After all, the thread is mostly about GTA, and that's probably the crudest video game that can be sold in a public display. I do apologise for offending you with my boners though. I'll go back to beating hookers to death with dildos now.