Quote:
Originally Posted by Future Esthar
You are relying on information told by Odine which could be false.
Burden of proof is on YOU to prove that he is. I can just as easily declare that Zell might be lying about his gender with equal validity.
Quote:
Policeman donīt do this.They concentrate on physical proof.
So give me a proof or at list evidence or hint that she comes from the future based on physical proof other than dialogue.
1- The towns and structures of the present still exist. This includes things which by their nature- such as paved roads, trains, etc. cannot be particularly old. Especially damning is fisherman's wharf.
2- Centra. It was wiped out within recent history of present. It is still as such in future. It would be different in past.
Quote:
I will start myself:
1-We donīt see the pictures on Ultiīs castle anywherwe on the "present".
Which means nothing. We don't see any of the vehicles in Episode one of SW in the OT.
Quote:
2-On the "present" no one needs birds to send messages to anyone.
Need, hell no. Still employed- YES. In our world of Phone, Internet, LIVE STREAMING INTERNATIONAL TELECONFERENCE, still have people who send messages via birds.
Quote:
3-Monarchy seems to had ended on the present.We know from Solomonīs ring that it existed on the past.
'Monarchy' can exist any time someone with enough power gets it into their head to call themselves such. And monarchy was not that long dead in FF8.
Quote:
Considering 1 and assuming Ulti lives on the future the paintings were made some years from the present,right?
No. Unwarranted assumption. All of your assumptions beyond this point hinge on this unwarranted assumption that these paintings did not exist in Squall's era.
Quote:
So they describe events between the two times.
Which made them strange,specially "Red Clothes" and "Messenger".
Where is a picture of an elevator,a picture of a car,a picture of a radio or telephone (which would make more sense than "Messenger"),a picture of a train,a picture of a spaceship?
Some of these pictures depict ancient like cities and it didnīt make sense that people would make cities like that from the present on.
Still hinging on that assumption, I see. The possibility that Ultimecia likes classical paintings never crossed your head, eh?
Quote:
4-Suposedly Ultimecia made her Castle.She would had soldiers or she would not make the armory.Letīs see,what kinds of soldiers would dress that medieval armor?
You assume that a crazy woman whose plan it is to effectively eat time and who employs monsters up the ying-yang to defend her personal space would A: Build an armory for a purpose instead of for appearances, or B: Actually employ HUMAN guards?
Heck, look up "Mad king Ludvig". That man put more useless stuff than an armory no one used in his castles, and he wasn't half as crazy as Ultipoo.
Quote:
Galbadian soldiers?Esthar soldiers?White SeeD?Seed?Traitor Seeds like Seifer?Some unknown country who borns on the future?
It must be a very traditionalist or conservative country,really.
Or it's kept for ceremonial purposes, if it's used at all. I know people who keep suits of armor as decoration, or to occasionally wear, not for any practical purpose.
Quote:
I donīt really think it were monsters either.
Did Ulti made them magically?(lol)
The armor? It's possible. It's also possible that she got so wrapped up in the classic 'romantic' idea of nobility that she gathered up all the ye olde crappe she could find and threw a castle together out of it.
Quote:
People will argue about the clock,the Helix and other things like that but they just show that someone from the future is possessing Ulti and making that stuff through her.
In a word- Bull. Medieval technology could not reconstruct such things. And if Ulti's doing it, then why can't she have simply created everything else herself?
Basically, your argument here is 'Well, it looks medieval-ish, so it must be that time.'
Do you realize how silly this is? If you blindfolded, KOd, and then woke up in a room decorated entirely in 70's fashion, but which had DISTINCT anachronisms- things which could not have POSSIBLY been constructed by the existing technologies of the 70's, would you honestly conclude that it must be the 70's?
Now then, I put the onus upon you to attempt to refute all this WITHOUT INVOKING YOUR THEORY. If you invoke your theory to DEFEND your theory, you will be using circular logic, and automatically fail.