I think I could manage five of them. Most of you guys are stroking your egoes by proudly claiming you could deal with more than five, but you forget how vicious the little guys get when they're cranky.
Biting, clawing...
Printable View
I think I could manage five of them. Most of you guys are stroking your egoes by proudly claiming you could deal with more than five, but you forget how vicious the little guys get when they're cranky.
Biting, clawing...
Being I have been in a very similar situation where there was 30 - 40 kids against me (I checked the numbers with my sister-in-law who was also present at this party) I happen to know I could take over 20 of the little gits! 5 year olds weigh nothing and on average are about 3 - 4 feet tall and weigh under 5 stone! 5 of them isn't too hard it's about tactics here as much as strength, you can't touch the walls so you take centre court and kick the little gits everywhere. When you think I took on my 3 oldest nephews today and even pinning the youngest down one handed managed to beat up the other 2 without effort when one of them is 14 turning 15 in a matter of 5 - 6 weeks it's not effort to take down 20 or so 5 year olds.
What? You mean this isn't an old dead thread that's been revived? :rolleyes2
If I am allowed a cup, than I imagine I could take and smear many a five-year-olds' guts along the floor. I have a particular hate for younger children, so the incentive wouldn't be much of a problem, nor would there be any issues with feeling any sort of remourse.
They can bite, so the smurf can I. I am not the strongest of people, but compared to several very young individuals, such strength is legendary. You recall how your father could seemingly break your hand with ease when you were younger? The same can now be applied to me.