Bert you scare me sometimes. Anyway Texas and VT can be their own countries fo shoQuote:
Originally Posted by Bert
Printable View
Bert you scare me sometimes. Anyway Texas and VT can be their own countries fo shoQuote:
Originally Posted by Bert
Only sometimes? :p PG you've known me long enough to know that most of the time random nonsensical things come out of me :D
Is this forum basically just spam now? If we do not get back on topic, then Rantzien will be on us.
You say that like me being on you is not a pleasurable experience.
well if ranty panty is gonna mount me I had better spam some more! :bigsmile:
legalizing it would be the worst thing to happen for it. Face it, all those dealers would go out of business, it would be on shelves next to cigarettes, all the fun and appeal would go away! Eventually you'll move onto something more exciting, because what's available legally is never enough, then there'll be the push to make ecstasy legal...... yeah, illegal drugs are better off staying illegal.
Heh, then why do people still smoke cigarettes? And why do some stores not sell alcohol? Don't be slippin' off that slope you've oiled up for yourself, there.
This thread has become mind-boggling.
marijuana is harmless and dwi akready exists as a law so what is the problem?
I think they made weed in amsterdam off limits to foreigners so come to canada! we already play host to 19 y.o guys who act stupid in our border cities wat would some more druggies hurt?
Yes, that's what I'm hoping for.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tai-Ti
What do you have against ecstasy? Fewer people die from that than from alcohol or cigarettes (yes, even when adjusted for a higher amount of users of tobacco and alcohol), or do you want to ban those too?
Yes, because most people only smoke pot because it's illegal :monster:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tai-Ti
Wait wait, you can die from E overdose.Quote:
Originally Posted by MirageYes, that's what I'm hoping for.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tai-Ti
What do you have against ecstasy? Fewer people die from that than from alcohol or cigarettes (yes, even when adjusted for a higher amount of users of tobacco and alcohol), or do you want to ban those too?
And you can die from alcohol overdose. And cigarettes kill you slowly and painfully. So?
If E were legal, you'd be less likely to get bad stuff.
Also, every anti-pot argument in this entire thread is the worst argument I've seen for anything ever.
You can die from a salt overdose. So what?Quote:
Originally Posted by PeegeeWait wait, you can die from E overdose.Quote:
Originally Posted by MirageYes, that's what I'm hoping for.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tai-Ti
What do you have against ecstasy? Fewer people die from that than from alcohol or cigarettes (yes, even when adjusted for a higher amount of users of tobacco and alcohol), or do you want to ban those too?
Oh yeah, here's a list over other substances I think should be at least decriminalized.
So: I am not following the argument.Quote:
Originally Posted by MirageYou can die from a salt overdose. So what?Quote:
Originally Posted by PeegeeWait wait, you can die from E overdose.Quote:
Originally Posted by MirageYes, that's what I'm hoping for.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tai-Ti
What do you have against ecstasy? Fewer people die from that than from alcohol or cigarettes (yes, even when adjusted for a higher amount of users of tobacco and alcohol), or do you want to ban those too?
Oh yeah, here's a list over other substances I think should be at least decriminalized.