Recognized Member Cap

Well, someone, I can't remember who *ahem*it was Kishi*ahem*, suggested Cid's Whores and then another person *ahem*it was Leeza*ahem* said only if it was in purple =D?

*blinks*

drat, I was expecting something that would actually be funny.

((Sorry, didn't even smile))

I didn't say it was offensive, I said it was innapropriate for a "family board," the quotes meaning to imply that I'm attempting to uphold rules that I don't particularly care for.

I think that shade of purple clashes with EoFF's blues anyway though.

what's the max font size for this forum?

And why the heck do you have to use hacks to change people's titles? Not so much that it's in colour (which I think would require haxors), but to have just another group. I mean, forums start with admins and guests and users as preset groups, no? Can't you just make a new group, base it on users, and call them "recognised members"?

bah, VBB sucks.

Because the administrator/knight/recognised member ranks aren't custom titles, if they were, you wouldn't be able to have your own custom title as well - and we do use a seperate user group for them anyway :p

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Pureghetto
bah, VBB sucks.

---

VBB doesn't exist. vBulletin does, though.

If I somehow get excluded from the 'elite 13' or whatever I do not want a title that says 'Former Recognized Member' because that would look really dumb. And I'd rather not be worshipped in some shrine, but I don't think I'm in that category anyway. Just for reference.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Pureghetto
what's the max font size for this forum?

---

5 or something.

7 or +5

Now using style, that's another matter.

That's how you can type micro text that no one can read without copypasting it, or maxi text that uses a screen per character.

Somebody remind me again why we leave HTML enabled here? Other than to make us vulnerable to malicious scripts like Jack and his buddies posted here not too long ago?

It would be nice if we kept HTML, but that leaves us vulnerable to attacks that uses HTML. So the safest way to prevent another such attack would be to remove HTML. Of course, it's not very often that we'll get attacked, but if we do remove HTML, I'd be expecting a lot of signatures with HTML scripts left in tact. :p

Because it's a matter of prejudice against the vBulletin-illiterate.

I like HTML :( I'd rather just keep things the way they are, we're fine with those dumdumheads with the scripts, we know how to deal with them efficiently now.

In fact, clout already banned the few tags that can cause trouble, or majorly slow things up (embed, iframe and bgmusic).
The script tag is taken care of by vb already, as far as I know.

So, uh, Recognised Memebers, huh? Sounds good.