I have many sorts of aswers to the original poster, which I think will sum up pretty much what a lot (if not all) the people who posted here think.
The first kind is, well, to point and laugh at you. Let's get into details. You don't like how the US President is elected, yet Estonia has the following system:
president elected by Parliament for a five-year term; if he or she does not secure two-thirds of the votes after three rounds of balloting in the Parliament, then an electoral assembly (made up of Parliament plus members of local governments) elects the president, choosing between the two candidates with the largest percentage of votes
Which means that virtually, people have no direct control of who is elected president either.
The judiciary branch (National Court) chairman is appointed for life by the Parliament. At least in the US, the AG and DoJ get reshuffled.
The GDP of Estonia (ppp) per capita is $12,300 (2004 est).
The GDP of the USA (ppp) per capita is ... *drumrolls* $37,800 (2004 est.)
Do I really need to keep showing why living in the USA is currently (slash has been for centuries slash will be for a long time) much, much better than living in Estonia?
The second sort of answer is just to blow you off. If you dislike everything from the USA so much, you might aswell leave now, considering the majority of the EoFF community lives there, that the server is hosted there, that the owner is from there, etc...
The third kind, which you seem to prety much ignore, is to argue and ask you to answer some pretty simple question.
Japan does a pretty damn good job, with only 374,744 sq km of land, much of which is mountain area, thus cannot be used for living or ressource growing/digging.Quote:
Also the wellbeing of your citizens is only due to the resources you have, not because of the government.You think there is a lot of crops in the desert area?What about materials?
I could live in the US. In fact, I might very well move there in the next 6 years, because I'd be paid a lot more for the same job.Quote:
Also I think that anyone who likes their country would say that they wouldnt live anywhere else.So that isnt much of a statement.
But they're protecting 200 millions americans. Also, you seem to think the US is personally rsponsible for all the casulaities in Iraq, when most comes from... bombings. From other Iraqis. And Iranians/Syrians/...Quote:
Those troops that you speak of have helped more than 100 000 civilians to their death.
It's more that they found a good scapegoat to not feel bad about their own government's failures. It's easy to blame.Quote:
Now people hate America a whole lot more.
Are you unable to see sarcasm when it's put in front of you?Quote:
Are you a soldier?Quote:
Let me tell you, I wake up in the morning full of excitement at the chance a new day brings to kill innocent civillians!
In order: 1) they fear they will lose their autority, and that their extremist view of Islam will be replaced by a "much more open to Western culture" version of it. 2) They also fear death. Bin Laden wasn't on the planes, he was "masterminding". The high ranked terrorists and extremists are the first to call the other militants to do suicide attacks, but they are the last to show the example. 3) See 1.Quote:
You think the Islam extremists fear anything???They dont fear death.Why should they fear America?
No, it took years and years of Saddam pushing the UN around. Which wasn't helped by the fact important people all over Europe had kickbacks from him, oil deals...Quote:
Common sense does.It was basically:HEY SADAM OMGUHAVILLGLWEAPSZOFMASZDISTRCTNPLZLETUSINURSCRTBA SESNAUOMGLOLZ!!111one and when Saddam said no they immadietly went to war.
I'd say that this was the best reply:Quote:
What other reasons could there be?Save Iraq?Dont make me laugh. Weapons of Mass Destruction?None there.
If it has no reason then the American government really is stupid.
Oh, for the record, the biggest genocide ever commited was by the Communist regime(s) (USSR, China, Cambodia...) after the Second World War (80+ millions estimated deaths).Quote:
As much as I detest the war in Iraq, that is NOT the truth as to why we are there. It isn't about liberation, it isn't about weapons of mass destruction, it isn't about terrorism, and it isn't necessarily about oil. At least not in the way you claim. The war in Iraq has to do with strategic placement of U.S. troops and controlling recources like middle eastern oil. That's why we haven't seen a drop in gas prices. We don't need to use it, we just want to control it. Read "Rebuilding America's Defenses" from a conservative think tank known as "The Project for the New American Century". It outlines what the Bush administration WANTS to do. (It was written by a bunch of people, including Bush sr. Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, and Dick Cheney, just to name a few).