You do know that pedophilla and actually raping someone is different right? If its someone molesting another and raping them i would report them to the authorities as well. I meant demonizing Jacko however and i think you mistook me on that, maybe i wasnt clear enough.
What i meant on casual sex was that no one has to go by what Sasquatch said about his definition of a relationship and love and sex and whatever he said on the second paragraph. I dont agree with rape and i dont think i said i do anywhere.
Quote:
Wrong, just plain wrong. It is the first responsibility of a people to protect their society. And the first responsibility of a society to protect it's people. A society that fails to protect it's members, especially those that cannot protect themselves, has failed in the only thing it's truly meant for.
Uhhh....i dont see how that relates to what you quoted. I do not feel i have any responsibility to protect society necessarily you know? Just like the other guy seeing you being beaten up, he doesnt have to help you. It would be nice if he did but if he doesnt then he doesnt. Society doesnt protect its members too, in some cases it hurts some of those that cant defend themselves. Maybe its first responsibility for you but not for everyone out there.
I think its fine for him to have an opinion too, just he came off as especially offensive and rude many times and i just havent said much about it. Again i am talking about a pedophile, not a child molestor, and i think thats where we got misunderstood. Most people think of pedophiles as child molestors and rapists right off the bat, while i do not and just think of them as people that have a fetish for children.
Quote:
Actually, the fact that you refuse to even accept the evidence that you're wrong. Child molesters (and all child-adult sexual activity is molestation) DESTROY lives. As thoroughly as if they shot them.... more thoroughly, actually... the survival rates (lifespan) for gunshot victims are actually MUCH higher than that of child molestation victims. Bullets either kill or wound, wounds that heal. Molestation creates injuries that are less obvious, but just as horrific, and infinitely harder to treat.
Again i agree with you about child molestors and rapists. What i am saying is a pedophile, NOT a molestor or rapist. A pedophile does not immediate mean they are one of those.
Just curious can i see some information about rape vs gunshot wounds? I am just curious :3
Quote:
Actually, wrong again. I do believe that the person who started this thread asked for opinions and responces. General call, meaning, he has as much right as you do. Really, moreso, because he's being far more civil. And, for that matter, sane. Oh, and he doesn't have to reply to you, I think I did a good job. He's right-wing, and I'm about as far "left" as they go (or, does "Goddess-worshipping, bisexual, happily promiscuous intellectual" not go far enough to qualify me)... and, somehow, we are both unified in our belief that the wellbeing of the children is more important that some weak-willed scumbag's need to get laid.
Actually he was the one that put the "dont post here you dont even have to reply" bit.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sasquatch
Don't answer that, in fact there's no need for you to reply to me, just as there was no need for you to reply in the first place.
I fail to see how that is civil, and the only reason i said that was to let him know, is that really a civil way of talking?
I also agree with you that protecting children is good, maybe it got lost somewhere but i agree with that. Its just you guys put every single pedophile under the assumption they are molestors and rapists. That is untrue and that we should accept that there are people like that but arent molestors and rapists. Maybe i was being unclear and i apologize for that but thats the point i was trying to make.
Think i am insane all you want :P I am pretty liberal too.
EDIT!:
Quote:
If you're the type of person to say "oh, whatever somebody wants to do, it's their decision", then you go ahead and keep thinking that, but it's that same type of thinking that has and will further cause the downfall of our society, and we'll end up just like Soddom and Ghomorrah.
My point with the dog was to say that if you think it's natural and normal for people to want sex with anything simply because animals do it too, then it would mean that it's "normal" for people to hump the side of the couch, or their cat.
I will keep thinking that way, the guy next to you has every right to shoot you if he wants to, he just has to face the consequences. If you think it will cause the downfall of society, go ahead. I dont care, i think its a perfectly fine way to think, everyone has every right to do something, but they just have to face the consequences.
Normal is also subjective, its normal for us to use cars, but in another society its not. So what is normal to you isnt normal to everyone else. If something is done that is not normal to you does that mean that it isnt done? Is it any less valid? Normal is just not justifyable to me, the act is just is, its up to us to decide if its normal or not.
In any case i aint going to flame as subtlely as you like in some of your paragraphs, because you really are flaming a few people. I wont go to deep into it and i will ignore that from now on because i just see it too often in your posts.
