Round 3 Part 2 - Team 2 (Team Awesome)

I'm gonna do homework for 15 minutes while I consider this. At school I only considered Candidate 1, but Candidate 5 gave me a very good reading when I came home.

I'll be back.

Alright, we are all in agreement in candidate one. Like others pointed out, we are the staff, we can make an effort to be more active where we lack.

So, are we for sure promoting candidate one?

Okay this is the best possible solution I could come up with...

Unanimous opinions are very important, one opinion shouldn't be worth more then another

We all agree one on one, some of us agree on 3, some of us agree on 5, no one wants 4 or 2.

So we should give our results to Del as...

Promotes
Candidate 1

Possible Future Recruits
Candidates 3 and 5

Doesn't Recommend
Candidates 2 and 4


All in favor?

that's fine with me

THE JACKEL

Yah, we should wait for the people who haven't voted yet, as I think only six of us have voted. But other than that I think that we call 3 and 5 possible future recruits.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Dolentrean

Yah, we should wait for the people who haven't voted yet, as I think only six of us have voted. But other than that I think that we call 3 and 5 possible future recruits.

---

I like that name better :D

Let's wait for others, but I like qwerty's idea that silence is support, because if it isn't then we'll miss the deadline.

Yah, I say we give them an hour, that will give us one hour till the deadline. Everyone good with that?

Well, I think we should ask someone running this if we have to manually submit the decision, I'd like to give everyone a fair chance and the more time the better.

I know I feel good, so I will probably be able to give them the results all the way up to the deadline itself.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Goldenboko

Well, I think we should ask someone running this if we have to manually submit the decision, I'd like to give everyone a fair chance and the more time the better.

I know I feel good, so I will probably be able to give them the results all the way up to the deadline itself.

---

well I just asked Rubah, and she said she wasn't sure. I think if it's in here, unless they ask for it otherwise, then we'll be good
she said

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Rubah Lapah

his thread seems like it suggests you just post it with official pomp and circumstance in the threads

---

so yeah

THE JACKEL

I'm happy with our decision.

i would rather we vote on 3 or 5. not everyone is gonna get who they want and being able to live with the decision everyone else has made. you see not always gonna come to a consensus.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by edczxcvbnm

i would rather we vote on 3 or 5. not everyone is gonna get who they want and being able to live with the decision everyone else has made. you see not always gonna come to a consensus.

---

I think supporting candidate 1, and then if we were actually Cid Knights and seeing how candidate 3 and 5 developed for a little while after, is a much better decision. I'm sure the staff is looking at us and thinking some of us could be good Cid Knight's in time, but aren't ready for the job yet either.

THE JACKEL

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by edczxcvbnm

i would rather we vote on 3 or 5. not everyone is gonna get who they want and being able to live with the decision everyone else has made. you see not always gonna come to a consensus.

---

This staff doesn't make a CK unless its unanimous, and I full agree with that notion.

Alright, if we manage to come to a decision we will promote another, but for now it seems like 1 is the only canidate that we are all for.

EDIT: Alright, this is bad timing, but I got to go, I more than likely wont be back until after the deadline. Good luck with the possible second promotion.

I'm still for my idea of mentioning 3 and 5 as future prospects.