:stare:
Printable View
:stare:
Hahahaha, that's awesome! Thank you for that. :lol:Quote:
Originally Posted by Laddy
I just watched Bio Dome again today. :bigsmile:
Which is?Quote:
Originally Posted by Forsaken Lover
1. Go to Google SearchQuote:
Originally Posted by ShinyWhich is?Quote:
Originally Posted by Forsaken Lover
2. Turn off SafeSearch
3. Type in your favorite childhood show and rule 34.
4. Profit!
But really, don't. Don't.
[QUOTE=Shiny;3169606]http://i.imgur.com/YsYKZ.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by LaddyWhich is?Quote:
Originally Posted by Forsaken Lover
Tis the ability to find porn of anything you like. And I mean anything. Even things you don't want porn of.
I probably should have just said "I have the internet". Rule 34 doesn't really 100% fit Emma Watson since there's plenty of actual sexy pics of her without me looking for drawings too.
If you don't have nudes of Emma Watson then it doesn't really count as Rule 34 of her :colbert:
My apparently unpopular opinions:
Avatar and Titanic weren't that bad. Overrated, yes, but hardly terrible movies like a lot of people seem to say.
Network is a better allegory for politics in modern America than anything that has been released since. The only thing I can think of that's even come close is Lincoln.
While The Phantom Menace was unforgivably awful, Attack of the Clones and Revenge of the Sith weren't actually that bad, and the latter might even be described as a decent film.
Some of the Star Wars novels have more interesting plots and writings than any of the films.
That last bit is just a plain fact. The writers of the novels have infinitely more talent than Lucas or anyone else who worked on the movies.
The Thrawn Trilogy alone is like a billion times better than all the movies combined.
I'd also say some of the games have better plots - namely KOTOR II. "What? The Force isn't a childish good and evil dynamic? Perish the thought!"
This is so so so not unpopular at least not if you speak to a group of film students or critics and I entirely agree.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Man
Sorry I asked about the Rule 34. :erm:
Quantum of Solace really wasn't a bad film at all. Its problem is that it wasn't really a Bond film.
i really liked quantum of solace also actually
casino was better but it's hard to follow up casino
quantum had a better soundtrack
Chalk me up as liking Quantum actually. Sure it couldn't top Casino, and there are better Bond films, but it was far from terrible and at least wrapped up some of the loose threads from Casino nicely.
I don't like James Bond. I would see the newer three because I think Daniel Craig is a fine example of masculinity and because Skyfall is just a cool title.
*runs*
Even though Bond is British, not enjoying Bond in general is still anti-American and anti-freedom. Why do you love terrorists, Megan?
Quantum of Solace still sucked, though.
That actually convinced me to go download the movie now. I'm absolutely not into that cheesy typical Bond crap whatsoever so if it's gonna be just Craig Daniel being badass for an hour and a half I'm fine with it.Quote:
Originally Posted by The Man
That's not all there is to it, though there is indeed probably an hour and a half of Daniel Craig being badass. It was a lot more political than the typical Bond film. It would probably have fit better as a Bourne film than a Bond film. If that makes any sense.
It's also worth noting that he's angsting pretty badly for a lot of the film, but considering what he'd gone through it makes sense. If you haven't seen Casino Royale a lot of the plot might be close to incomprehensible. Casino Royale isn't exactly a typical Bond film either; it deconstructs a lot of the tropes used by most of the earlier Bond films.
Saw it earlier today - it's not bad at all! It was too much action focused, bit superb filming work and Craig was badass. Way better than everything else made before Casino Royale.