Hmm. Finally somthing different then Farhenheit 9/11...
http://www.citizensunited-interactive.org/c41.11/
discuss.
to bad its in selected theaters. :(
Printable View
Hmm. Finally somthing different then Farhenheit 9/11...
http://www.citizensunited-interactive.org/c41.11/
discuss.
to bad its in selected theaters. :(
Ah. So some conservative propaganda to counter Moore's liberal propaganda, I see.
This shouldn't change how people will vote, just like Fahrenheit 9/11 didn't. Conservatives will flock to this the same way liberals did 9/11. I'm still voting Kerry, this isn't going to change it.
Could've had a better title, if you ask me.
Actually, there is alot of people that have changed there view points due to Michael Moore's propagandaa.Quote:
his shouldn't change how people will vote, just like Fahrenheit 9/11 didn't.
Well, statistically it didn't. I know it didn't change mine. I was already voting Kerry anyway. I don't like him, but I'd rather have him than Bush's administration.
Anyone who's mind was changed by Fahrenheit 9/11 is an idiot. People. This stuff's been on the news every night for two, three years. If you needed that shrill bastard to condense it for you, you need to pay more attention to the world around you.
Saw this at ASC already. Like I said there, I'm glad it's anti-Moore but dislike it because it's pro-Bush. I'd post the comic I posted there but y'know the whole inappropriateness thing.
This movie looks like the whole purpose is to discredit a person who isn't even running for office. It doesn't look like it attacks Kerry or Bush in anyway but attacks Moore.
Ross Perot "Now thats just sad."
I also think the title is stupid ;) Terrible...F.
Michael Moore was right about one thing. "There is no terrorist threat"
Bwahahaha xDQuote:
Originally Posted by nik0tine
People in Madrid thought that exactly. New-Yorkers too. Here's my answer to the "there's no terrorist threat":
Typical republican scare tactics. Yes, there is a terrorist threat - but the threat will only get bigger as long as Bush's retaliatory tactics continue.
Of-course. Let's just roll over and die. 'Cause it's a known fact that terrorists and other bullies always stop harassing you when you don't retaliate.Quote:
Yes, there is a terrorist threat - but the threat will only get bigger as long as Bush's retaliatory tactics continue.
Did it work for you in school?
Actually, we have been in terrorist threat for 30 years.You know there is more terrorism in the world than Al Quaeda.Quote:
Originally Posted by EndlessBwahahaha xD
People in Madrid thought that exactly. New-Yorkers too. Here's my answer to the "there's no terrorist threat":
Yeah, it did, actually.Quote:
Originally Posted by War Angel
:rolleyes:Quote:
Yeah, it did, actually.
Well, it never worked for me, or anyone else I know, and I've tried that tactic for a good while. It was not untill the end of the eigth grade, when I started working out and gained some 20 pounds of muscle, after I hung and choked one of them against the lockers, that I finally got left alone. Impotence is not a good thing to portray infront of those who appreciate and recognise nothing but strength.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shadow Nexus
Yes I do. I mean, we have the corsicans and the basques here. And we had islamic fundamentalists blow up subways a few years back too. But what I mean, blindfolding yourself into "there is no terrorist threat" is foolish. There has been threats for a long time, and there will be for even longer. Now, knowing that, you can choose to let it run your life ("scare tactics" as scogs put it), or you can choose to live and show determination (pretty much any government's choice to not negociate with hostage takers for example) to show that you're not going to let them get their way (making us leave in fear or pushing us into submission). Putting your hands on your ears and singing lalalala isn't going to make terrorists disappear.
