Apparently I support terrorism

I'm being as serious as pg can be serious, which isn't any bit at all here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criticism_of_Greenpeace

According to this article we can conclude that Greenpeace is guilty of sorts of eco-terrorism. They're also basically a political organisation which is anti-corporation / globalisation / buzzword of the dayism.

Every month I give Greenpeace about 10 dollars to continue doing what they do. I am now guilty of aiding and abetting terrorism.

Thankfully I live in Canada.

So, who else supports terrorism?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pureghetto

So, who else supports terrorism?

---

Anyone who supports PETA, not me thankfully.

Also anyone who smokes weed, heroin, probably most other drugs, or drives a car! Not me thankfully as well.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Pureghetto

buzzword of the dayism

---

Haha, that line is gold.

Didn't the French counter-terrorist team, the GIGN sink one of Greenpeace's ships one time?

...

*starts sining La Marseillaise*

I oppose many of the policies of Bush and actively speak out against them. Therefore, I am a Terrorist.

Eco-terrorism? Isn't Greenpeace suppose to protect it?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Megami

Eco-terrorism? Isn't Greenpeace suppose to protect it?

---

That's what they want you to believe :jokey:

Damn I never suppoted terrorism :whimper: :weep:

Wikipedia tries to keep it neutral but sometimes the Busheviks win :rolleyes2

If you don't worship Bush and Blair you are a drugs-commie-terro-immorality supporting libbie. Or as OxyRush says always with a sneer, a "libural".

Anyone that post in NANNY MANUS' usernote supports terrorism and MANUSism. :(

Turrists

Yes, as well as supporting Greenpeace and taking part in a number of actions with them i also support (though not financially or actively) palestinian groups, communist organisations and have sympathy for other organisations that could be considered "terrorists".

Sometimes Greenpeace, like other organizations, conducts questionable and even outright illegal activities.

However, any attempt to confuse trespass and sabotage with terrorism deserves utter comtemp and a brief education of what terrorism actually is.

Edit: Supporting an ideology or goal which is also supported by a terrorist group does not mean you support that group, or the means they use.

Heck, our "Presunit" GW Bush took oodles of money from questionable Arabs, including members of the Bin Laden family (his last biz failure was bankrolled by Bin Laden's shady uncle). So when GW's Dick calls liberals "Turrist supporters" I just think he's getting so batshiite crazy that he is confusing GW with a libbie ;)

Greenpeace are harmless anyway, bless 'em. :)

LONG LIVE DO-GOODERS!

No. Why the hell would I support Greenpeace? I actively support global warming, toxic waste dumping and harshing the vibes, maaaaan. Bah, stupid lefties ruining everybody's fun. What's the good in having an Earth if you can't trash it, that's what I'd like to know.

Can someone direct me to the Oral Office? *Has a bomb strapped on*

I once threw a paper airplane at my grandma's house of cards.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by TyphoonThaReapa

Can someone direct me to the Oral Office? *Has a bomb strapped on*

---

Wrong kind of strap-on.

Are you kidding? Of course! Oz is the new Iraq. I mean, we have David Hicks, and... uh... well we do have David Hicks, and that's a start, at least.

So Greenpeace cooperates with Bin Laden? I have to add this to wikipedia right away. *brb*

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renmiri

Wikipedia tries to keep it neutral but sometimes the Busheviks win :rolleyes2

If you don't worship Bush and Blair you are a drugs-commie-terro-immorality supporting libbie. Or as OxyRush says always with a sneer, a "libural".

---

I don't support Bush anymore. But I'm not a drugs-commie-terrowhatever liberal. I'm actually neither political party, as I agree and disagree with both sides. So no matter which president is in office, I'll always be satisfied and dissatisfied.

All bets are off if Hillary wins the election though. That's when I move to Canada. Or Mexico.

I doubt very seriously that GreenPeace commits terrorism and I know almost nothing of the organization but one thing I do know is that they have a rep of being militant. Are they? I have no clue but the rep is there.
Weren't they on a boat at the beginning of Armageddon? "Stop the drilling, stop the drilling!". I bet they hate oil drillers turned golfers :D

There are more important things.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by fantasyjunkie

I doubt very seriously that GreenPeace commits terrorism and I know almost nothing of the organization but one thing I do know is that they have a rep of being militant. Are they? I have no clue but the rep is there.
Weren't they on a boat at the beginning of Armageddon? "Stop the drilling, stop the drilling!". I bet they hate oil drillers turned golfers :D

---

Greenpeace doesn't actively and public perform acts of terrorism but they do support anti-corporate terrorism.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Poetically Pathetic

All bets are off if Hillary wins the election though. That's when I move to Canada. Or Mexico.

---

I hate her and don't believe a word she says but might vote for her if it comes to it.

Why do middle grounders and conservatives fear her so much ? She can't be worse than GW!!!!

Greenpeace = Avalanche, go blow up some reactors :)

Nah, I think it's only really the extremists who are terrorists.

Allegedly a lot of the black/grey market stuff (drugs, pirated DVDs, etc) are often used for funding terrorism, for what it's worth, but I don't know if it's just the anti-drug and anti-piracy crowds exaggerating to have an effect or not.