anyone see the new fantastic four yet? looks pretty...fantastic :D
ill be seeing it next weekend
Printable View
anyone see the new fantastic four yet? looks pretty...fantastic :D
ill be seeing it next weekend
and yet no sign of galactus, aside from, of course, the silver surfer...i guess they're saving that for the big reveal at the end of the movie..."you've defeated me...but my master has now arrived"
:rolleyes2
I gotta tell ya, this movie looks like the opposite of something good.
Early reviews say it sux. Unless you're under 7 years of age.
After Spider-Man 3,i sweared that i'll never see a movie based on a comic ever again!:mad2:
(same goes for video game adaptations too)
the way things are going, you're not going to see too many movies in the near future then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nifleheim7
I couldn't care less.I have seen too many crappy adaptations for my own good.Quote:
Originally Posted by Aracielthe way things are going, you're not going to see too many movies in the near future then.Quote:
Originally Posted by Nifleheim7
I believe that there are many good screenwriters out there,with original stories to be told but the producers are affraid to risk their money on them...and instead they choose the easy solution of a big comic/video game franchise for some quick cash in.
It's ok.
I have some excellent games to play and some great comics to read if i want to...
couldn't agree more. though hollywood has always been about adapting other media, or at least since early last century, it seems to me that there were better times.
The first F4 movie was pretty awful.
I've seen it today it was good IMO, it should've had a little bit more brawling wit the Surfer and as Galactus is the baddest super villain in the Marvel universe they should've at least shown his face, but it was okay overall. I give it a 7/10.
Kids can be dumb, but rarely are they THIS dumb.Quote:
Originally Posted by I Took the Red Pill
Good Job, i regret seeing it to!! (if thats what your saying)Quote:
Originally Posted by Nifleheim7
They say it's gonna be better than the first one - the only problem is that the first sucked quite a bit, so it shouldn't be that difficult to make a better movie.
Jessica Alba's hotness should be enough to go see this movie, though.
It better be better than the first one, cos that was pretty crap tbh
Now theres someone with sense!Quote:
Originally Posted by Breine
More superheroes.... *snore*
Quote:
Originally Posted by LunarWeaver
The above is true.Quote:
Originally Posted by Roto13
The above I wish was more true.Quote:
Originally Posted by I'm my own MILFKids can be dumb, but rarely are they THIS dumb.Quote:
Originally Posted by I Took the Red Pill
Neeeaaaw.
I will not see the crapfest, not even for Jessica Alba. (Who I find kind of plain.)
Meet Jessica Alba expressing her emotions towards the playwrite:
http://blogs.commercialappeal.com/bl...ica%20alba.jpg
All in all I thought it was a pretty good movie. Not the best movie to come from Marvel, but not entirely awful. Although the first one was rather bad, I enjoyed this one.
saw it today liked it better then the 1st one. kinda short but the silver surfer is cool.
I hated the fantastic four and theres no way I'm going to waste perfectly good money on the second one. The story itself seems so straightforward , just from the previews. This things trying to destroy the world and they clearly stop it.(no I don't read the comics, don't care how inaccurate it is....)
She's hardly good looking. ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Breine
Anyway. Just got back from seeing it today. I had low expectations. Very low. And I still found it terrible. I laughed my way through most of it. But then, I do that with a lot of movies. Anyway, yeah. It was better than the first - not that it's HARD to be better than the first - but it was still pretty terrible.
Not to mention, in a London scene, the people in London had American accents. =[
hardly?
has no one here SEEN sin city?!?!!
ah well....different strokes.
I thought it was cool enough. The (SPOILER)Surfer Doom fight was pretty neat. Better than part 1.
i just came back from seeing it, i loved it, though it was a bit short
Hahaa... sarcasm, right? :shifty:Quote:
Originally Posted by ShaunaShe's hardly good looking. ;DQuote:
Originally Posted by Breine
I do not plan on seeing this movie for it looks vary lame and I am not in the slightest bit interested in Jessica Alba.
This was such a disappointing movie. It started off slow, but I could deal, but the rest of the movie had NO development at all. I generally couldn't have cared less about what happened. If the movie was 30 minutes longer, it could've been a lot better, but as it was it looked like a 10-year-old had been given the pieces of the plot and put them together in the most simple manner possible.
amen man amenQuote:
Originally Posted by Dyslexicon
but Alba does look weird with the hair and the eyes though nevertheless i thought the movie was ok!? If it went on for half an hour i reckon the movie wouldve dragged on....alot! but yeah it wasnt perfect...obviously!!