I think it's because Spider-Man 2 was more dramatic than the original Spider-Man.
Printable View
I think it's because Spider-Man 2 was more dramatic than the original Spider-Man.
Why do people ask everybody a question, when they just answer it themselves? :D
Well I thought there was another reason Skull-Face. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Cyric
'cause different people have different tastes and like different things
TBH. Spidey 2 is the best because the original was very predictable and cliche. Spidey 3 was just WAY too mellow, it was made as a kids' movie and it suffered HORRIBLY. #4 will make or break the franchise. That's my opinion.
I think Spider-Man 4 is gonna be the straw that breaks the camel's back if you what I mean. :jokey:Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyric
I don't think many people really get the point of Spider-Man 3. It was cheesy on purpose, unlike 1 and 2 which were just cheesy.
I think people like Spider-Man 2 because all that radioactive-spider-uncle-ben crap is out of the way. Everyone knows the Spider-Man story by now.
But aren't all superhero movies cheesy? Because I'm pretty sure your girlfriend thinks all comic book films are cheesy.Quote:
Originally Posted by Roto13
They don't have to be. The Dark Knight isn't. But the Spider-Man movies are, and Spider-Man 3 embraced that.
And I don't have a girlfriend, I have a husband.
Sorry madam I thought you were a guy because you have that Indiana Jones icon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Roto13
I am a guy. >_>
Quote:
Originally Posted by John_912Sorry madam I thought you were a guy because you have that Indiana Jones icon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Roto13
:sweatdropQuote:
Originally Posted by Roto13
That exchange amused me greatly.
I always liked Spiderman, one of my favorite hero’s. I liked the first the best, I personally enjoyed the cheesiness of the first two. But the third made me die a little on the inside.
Quote:
Originally Posted by John_912Sorry madam I thought you were a guy because you have that Indiana Jones icon.Quote:
Originally Posted by Roto13
:love: love icon for truth. Because it was already quoted for truth.Quote:
Originally Posted by Roto13
Spider-Man 2 was my least favorite so I don't know what happened there.
Well, here are some of my reasons for liking Spider-Man 2:
The dilemma Spidey faces in this film is quite intriguing as he struggles to define who he wants to be and what sacrifices he's willing to make. This was already briefly discussed in SM1, but in SM2 they really took it into consideration and produced quite thought-provoking material. One of the big themes in particularly this film was what makes someone a hero, and I think this was realized brilliantly in the script and film itself.
The storyline in general is quite touching. All the main characters (Peter, MJ, Harry, Doc Ock) have crises that they have to deal with on an emotional level, and it's nice how the script makes all the subplots merge and receive interesting conclusions at the end of the film. Doc Ock in particular was a very sympathetic villain because of his story and relationship to Peter, and he was also quite effective and badass as a villain too, which further enhanced his appeal (e.g. going through all those people to get Spidey in the train). Not only that, but the added dilemma of the distinct tentacle personality was a nice touch.
Cinematography works quite well in the film as camera moves, sets and the overall colour tones help to serve the story. CGI is used well, and there are many highlights such as the thrilling train battle. The actors do a good enough job in their roles, and I was particularly impressed by Alfred Molina's performance as Doc Ock which was truly gripping. The humour in the film is quite nice too, managing to traverse the border of utter ridiculousness and restrained smirks in a good manner.
The score really aids the film and even if some of the cues weren't by Danny Elfman, they manage to merge into his style well enough to not get too distracting. Elfman (the primary composer) uses many of his established themes well, uses a lot more choir than in the first film and introduces interesting new themes and motifs (such as Doc Ock's devilishly addictive theme and the nice elegy motif for the exhausted Spider-Man as heard in "Appreciation"). The music enhances certain key events in the film and brings the film to life in an even better way than the first film's score did.
All in all Spider-Man 2 is an improvement over its predecessor and takes the drama and action to new heights and is an overall enjoyable experience as a film.
As long as Bruce Campbell is in it then i'm happy. :)
i think they're all awful adaptations of a good comic series but what the hell.
1 was the most bearable though.
the ending of Spider-Man 2 was just terrible
This is the only Spiderman for me.
"The Amazing Spider-Man" (1978)
I prefer The Spectacular Spider-Man over the Spider-Man Trilogy because that TV show handled the symboite and Venom better than Spider-Man 3 in my opinion. :cool:
Spider-Man 3 made a few big mistakes with Venom. Like how he kept referring to himself as one person. No Venom appearance is complete without saying something like "We are Venom." Also, who the hell casts Topher Grace as Venom? Last I check, Venom isn't supposed to be comic relief.
i still the think the first one is better than the second, mostly cause the first one kept my attention more
In The Spectacular Spider-Man there was a cool scene where Venom said "I bet you wish you had the black suit now." and Spider-Man said "Oh shut up!" then Spidey shot web fluid at Venom's mouth.Quote:
Originally Posted by Roto13
Venom's mouth was covered with spider webs but a hole opened up around Venom's torso and he said "You can quip it out but you can't take it."
(I love that scene, The Spectacular Spider-Man is the best superhero cartoon since Batman: The Animated Series in my opinion. :D)
Because the original is made of ridiculous amounts of whiny censorship and terrible cgi.
I don't exactly know why, but I just think Spider-Man 2 was an overall better movie than the first. The last one was also entertaining, but they just crammed way too much into one movie.. three villains is a but overkill.
Because it was a better movie than the original?
I don't think Spider Man 2 is hands down better than Spider Man but I think it beats it by a smidge. Alfred Molina was pretty damn good as Dr Octopus and I think overall it was better paced and the action scenes were more entertaining. I still love the original but I felt too much of it was spent watching Maguire trying to impress Dunst like this was some Girl Next Door type of movie. I know it had to be in there but that doesn't mean I had to of liked it.
This is the most perfect answer that has ever been typed anywhere on the Internet.Quote:
Originally Posted by DK