Big Momma's House 2
The Pink Panther 2
Ms. Congeniality 2
The question here is what are some movies that you wonder why a sequel was made for it? The original movie could have been good or bad, it doesn't matter.
Printable View
Big Momma's House 2
The Pink Panther 2
Ms. Congeniality 2
The question here is what are some movies that you wonder why a sequel was made for it? The original movie could have been good or bad, it doesn't matter.
Breakin' 2: Electric Boogaloo.
Wrong Turn 2.
Admittedly, the first five minutes are some of the best in any film but the rest of the movie sucks.
I think Ms Congeniality 1 and 2 were great!
Most Disney Movies dont seem to require sequels and the sequels usually suck.
Garfield 2? Really?Have you seen the first one? It's actually pretty good. And, to be fair, these aren't the only Pink Panther movies. :p I have all the old ones in a DVD set.Quote:
The Pink Panther 2
I would agree that it doesn't need a sequel though. :greenie:
Without a paddle 2.
EoFF 2.0
highlander 2
all immortals are aliens and the villain is michel ironside
highlander one three four and five are great movies each equally able to stand alone but two being a direct sequel just fails
Fantastic four. First one - piece of crap. Second one - crappier piece of crap.
Any of the Rockys.
Sisterhood of the Travelling Pants 2
Yeah, I'm not fond of the Disney sequels. But I don't blame Disney for making them. Mm, money.Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmage_nuke
That would depend on which one in the series you consider to be first, which one you consider to be second, and which one you consider to be the 10th.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yaridovich
I saw the movie on TV before. I didn't really like it. I found it to be kind of cheesy. I thought that Fantastic Four deserved a sequel as its a well known comic bok, but I didn't find either movie to be terrible, but they could have just been done better.Quote:
Originally Posted by Yaridovich
I didn't understand that need for Garfield 2 either. Disney just wants to milk money from their movies that's why stories like Mulan, and Cinderella that have a clear closure were forced into a sequel.
You shut the hell up, Rocky IV is greater than anything you will have ever watched in your lifetime.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gwawr
Yup, as far as I remember the only Disney sequel I've seen and liked was the third Lion King movie.Quote:
Originally Posted by NoctilucaYeah, I'm not fond of the Disney sequels. But I don't blame Disney for making them. Mm, money.Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmage_nuke
The Grudge 2 and 3
The Ring 2
Saw 2-5
Scream 2 and 3
Pretty much any horror sequel. Not a big horror fan to begin with, but horror sequels are usually the worst kind of sequel.
I just got done watching The Lost Boys II which just left me depressed. Just....why...
Gotta disagree with you there. Rocky II felt like a worthy sequel to Rocky. Then we had Rocky III with Mr.T which is awesome on so many levels. Then Rocky IV which had the most badass villain in the entire franchise, Drago. Ill admit that Rocky V was a load of bull, but still funny in an awful kind of way. And of course we have Rocky Balboa which closed the franchise nicely. Overall we have 5 out of 6 movies worth watching which isn't bad at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by Gwawr
I will not accept that I'm on my own with this one.
But then, I am a soft-spoken Welsh harpist. Possibly boxing movies are not my 'thing'....
any film which contained some twonk attempting to impersinate (or play the same character as) the great Peter Sellers deserves to be burned.Quote:
Originally Posted by Depression Moon
Originals were great. the rest were pointlessQuote:
Originally Posted by Autumn Rain
There was a THIRD Lion King movie? o_o!Quote:
Originally Posted by BreineYup, as far as I remember the only Disney sequel I've seen and liked was the third Lion King movie.Quote:
Originally Posted by NoctilucaYeah, I'm not fond of the Disney sequels. But I don't blame Disney for making them. Mm, money.Quote:
Originally Posted by blackmage_nuke
Yep it was Lion King 1 through Timons and Pumbas eyes and it also showed time their time before Lion King 1.Quote:
Originally Posted by Kentarou
Pirates of Caribbean 2 and 3. Both are good movie but neither doesnīt ainīt good as first one. First one works fine as single story but suddenly in the sequels in needs to be expanded into epic trilogy, except it fails being epic.
Resident Evil.
Well first one sucked too but it was watchable but third one ( havent seen second one but havent heard anything good about it) was totally crap. First I thought " this canīt be too bad" but after movie I wanted to erase my memory.
Disney and generally any family film have terrible sequels with the possible exception of the Rescuer's Down Under.
I will second the Pirates of the Caribbean sequels as well as adding the Matrix since the sequels were awful. Alien Resurrection was also pretty cheesy and terrible.
I didn't really like it. I found it to be kind of cheesy. I thought that Fantastic Four deserved a sequel as its a well known comic bok, but I didn't find either movie to be terrible, but they could have just been done better.
I didn't understand that need for Garfield 2 either. Disney just wants to milk money from their movies that's why stories like Mulan, and Cinderella that have a clear
Iron Monkey two........wow