Remakes/Reboots you actually like better than the original o:

Feel free to include games, too. Or perhaps even changes to your favorite candy!


Off the top of my head:

The Producers- The movie of the musical of the movie! Nathan Lane and Matthew Broderick are great together. Plus we get to see the Sigfried Oath scene!

Batmaaaan- I don't even like Batman and I thought The Dark Knight was cool.

Tomb Raider: Anniversary- It's wonderful! No awkward controls, you can actually tell what everything is supposed to be, and it's all three times as big. It was really cool going through a second time with the commentary. There were so many things they wanted to do with the original that they couldn't until now. Apparently not even some of the developers realized one of the levels was supposed to be a village. The only thing I didn't think was superior to the original was the dinosaur area of The Lost Valley. For me, nothing can ever top the first time I saw that level. Everyone in the house was in the living room watching my dad shoot little raptors, and my uncle said something along the lines of "Good thing there aren't any big dinosaurs, or he'd really be in trouble!" Then a goddamn T-Rex came and ATE HIS FACE. THEN ANOTHER ONE SHOWED UP. I don't know how the he got that second one to show up, I've only ever ran into one of them. Anyway that was cool. You know what, I'm going to make a thread for this right now. I want to gush about it more.

I was going to say Avatar but then I realized I didn't like Avatar better than Pocahontas or Last of the Mohicans.

The Thomas Crown Affair
His Girl Friday (it's a remake of an earlier play/film)
Ocean's Eleven (shame about the sequels)

Batman!
I liked the old films but the new ones are on a different level.

Batman.
Battlestar Galactica.

Batman - the Tim Burton films were terrible on almost every level imaginable except set design, but Batman Begins and the Dark Knight were both amazing.

Battlestar Galactica - seriously, even if someone didn't like the ending I don't think they could argue the original is better.

Star Trek - I wouldn't really say I like it better than the original, but it was pretty damn awesome in it's own way and the shot in the arm the franchise desperately needed.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vivi22

Batman - the Tim Burton films were terrible on almost every level imaginable except set design, but Batman Begins and the Dark Knight were both amazing.

---

This. Except I thought set design sucked too.

The Day the Earth Stood Still was good.
I'm hoping the new Tron is good.
I also liked the turn PoP took.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guardian XIII

The Day the Earth Stood Still was good.

---

are you completely baked

The Tim Burton Batman films were terrible? *shakes head sadly*

Doctor Who.

I've watched quite a bit of the old stuff, but enjoy the new stuff sooooo much more.

Then again, it doesn't really constitute as "reboot" because it takes place chronologically after the old stuff . . . more of a sequel than a reboot.

So... if you're saying that Nolan's Batman movies are better to Burton's, does this include the music too? I just have a hard time imagining Zimmer & Newton-Howard's stale two-note Batman theme being better than Elfman's iconic Batman theme. :p

Anyway, here are some of my picks for remakes that are arguably better than the earlier version(s):

The Man Who Knew Too Much (1956 version)
Ben-Hur (1959 version)
The Thing (1982 version)
The Fly (1986 version)
Lolita (1996 version)
The Quiet American (2002 version)

Argh I forgot about The Thing and The Fly :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kossage

So... if you're saying that Nolan's Batman movies are better to Burton's, does this include the music too? I just have a hard time imagining Zimmer & Newton-Howard's stale two-note Batman theme being better than Elfman's iconic Batman theme. :p

---

As iconic as that theme is it's also about the only song he's ever done that I like. I've never been a big fan of Elfman's style to be honest. So aside from the lack of an iconic Batman theme, I do actually feel that the new Batman movies had a soundtrack that suited the style a lot better. Not that Elfman's music didn't really suit the Burton films, but I've already established my disdain for them. I'm not sure what Tim Burton was basing them on, but it wasn't really Batman.

Batman, definitely. I can't think of others at the moment, though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Kossage

So... if you're saying that Nolan's Batman movies are better to Burton's, does this include the music too? I just have a hard time imagining Zimmer & Newton-Howard's stale two-note Batman theme being better than Elfman's iconic Batman theme. :p

---

I know you are crazy into the music of every movie, but the lack of one theme does not affect the fact that basically everything else about the new Batman series is a significant improvement over the original version. I will agree that the original theme was certainly iconic, but I'll take an overall better movie any day.

EDIT: Oh! FFT's PSP remake at least deserves a mention.

I like the gloomy mood from the two first Batman movies. Not sure I'd place them behind the remakes. I saw Batman Begins and I remember almost nothing from it :p Can't say it had a lasting impression on me. Dark knight was good though.

The Ring. I know lots of people are raving on about how the Japanese version is much more scarier. I disagree, and the remake is more fleshed out storywise, so I definitely like it better. Also, Naomi Watts.

And here's to hoping A Nighmare on Elm Street will have a remake that's better than the original!

Batman - I really enjoyed the earlier movies, but the new ones are easily much better films by all standards.

Battlestar Galactica - I don't care what you have to say about the changes they made, the series was smurfing amazing. Very well done.

That's all I got.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Moon Rabbits

I was going to say Avatar but then I realized I didn't like Avatar better than Pocahontas or Last of the Mohicans.

---

Last of the Mohicans was one of my favorite movies growing up, it's smurfing awesome.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Levian

The Ring. I know lots of people are raving on about how the Japanese version is much more scarier. I disagree, and the remake is more fleshed out storywise, so I definitely like it better. Also, Naomi Watts.

---

I forgot about that one. I agree on all counts pretty much. The original Ring was about as scary as Super Mario Bros. and wasn't told half as well as the remake. Not that the remake scared me either, but I would still say it was scarier.

The Office. :)

After careful consideration I think that Anastasia (1997 version) and 12 Monkeys (1995 version) are also better than the previous versions.

Also, I'd like to address the Batman issue even though it might go off-topic a bit:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Vivi22

As iconic as that theme is it's also about the only song he's ever done that I like. I've never been a big fan of Elfman's style to be honest.

---

So, I take it you didn't like his music in, say, Edward Scissorhands or Sleepy Hollow? Fair enough; Elfman's style is quite varied and can go from comedy to tragedy in the blink of an eye (and is sometimes very bizarre to say the least), so his music is a good example of "love it or hate it". As for me, I liked the way Elfman's themes and musical constructions fit Burton's films. :)

Quote:

---

So aside from the lack of an iconic Batman theme, I do actually feel that the new Batman films had a soundtrack that suited the style a lot better. Not that Elfman's music didn't really suit the Burton films, but I've already established my disdain for them. I'm not sure what Tim Burton was basing them on, but it wasn't really Batman.

---

Yes, I don't think Elfman's music per se would've worked in Nolanverse Batman because of the different focus of Burton's and Nolan's films. However, I do think that Zimmer and Newton-Howard didn't pour out as much of their talent in their two Batman score than they should've (and we all know that they're capable of so much better, which makes their lack of interest in the Batman score especially jarring). The manipulated one-note Joker theme in The Dark Knight was a bold move but apart from that the music follows especially Zimmer's comfort zone a bit too much. In my opinion the score doesn't give me the feeling that I'm listening to Batman; it makes me think of The Rock, Broken Arrow, Peacemaker and such. In other words it's generic and doesn't quite have a recognizable identity like Elfman's and Shirley Walker's Batman scores had.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Raistlin

I know you are crazy into the music of every movie, but the lack of one theme does not affect the fact that basically everything else about the new Batman series is a significant improvement over the original version. I will agree that the original theme was certainly iconic, but I'll take an overall better movie any day.

---

I see both Burtonverse and Nolanverse Batman films as pretty much equal, and I like both of them. They're so different on so many levels that it's quite hard to compare them fairly, though. What I like about Nolanverse is that it actually gives more time to Batman whereas Burtonverse was more fascinated with the villains who often stole the spotlight from Batman himself. Acting is good on both, and so is cinematography for the most part.

However, there are problems as well. First of all, both Michael Keaton and Kevin Conroy (from the live-action and animated Batman, respectively) handled the distinction between Batman and Bruce Wayne's voices well in a classy way. Christian Bale is acceptable in Begins but his Batman voice goes way overboard in TDK and sounds like he has throat cancer. I'm sure Nolan and Bale could've thought of a better way to show off Batman's voice than making it sound so unintelligible at times that it became borderline parody.

Second, the cutting is downright crazy in Begins and TDK. While in Burton's films you actually get to linger in a scene to get the proper mood, Nolan's action scenes in particular use so much rapid, MTV-like cutting that it seriously distorts the narrative. I admit that this technique works at first when Batman first shows himself to thugs in Begins as the rapid cutting shows the spreading fear among the thugs as this unknown vigilante attacks them. However, by the time we get to the final confrontation in Begins, the rapid cutting is still there when it serves no purpose and the final battle would've benefited from longer shots to show the duel between mentor and student. It's obvious that the actors actually learned complex fight moves (as can be seen in behind-the-scenes documentaries) but the rapid cutting in escape from the League of Shadows and the final train battle in particular ruin whatever fight choreography there was and thus you never quite get the thrill you would have if a scene was a few seconds longer before it cut to the next scene. Most of these cut examples also apply to TDK which is a bit better than Begins but still nowhere near the consistency of Burton's films.

Third, there's the pacing issue. Both of Burton's films have pretty good pacing overall. As for Nolan's films, I think Begins as a whole is more cohesive than TDK which dropped the ball at some point in the editing room. I have a feeling that Nolan actually shot a lot more material for TDK but had to cut it out, but in so doing he also hurt the flow of narrative a lot. You basically already have the climax with the Joker and then you suddenly get the prolonged dénouement with Two-Face which has its reason as far as narrative goes but could've been handled way better narrative-wise. There are also a lot of issues that should've been explored better such as the two traitorous police officers, some random remarks which seemingly make no sense (the "erratic" body count comment, for instance), plot holes etc. I have a feeling that the scenes that ended up on the cutting floor might've been dedicated to these issues so maybe they could've improved TDK had they been kept in.

Fourth, and perhaps the most subjective issue, is the set. What I like about Burton's Batman films is that they have what I like to call "carnivalesque gothic" sets. In other words Gotham City kind of reminds one of a city which mixes the past and the present together whle also having impressive gothic architecture. It captures the spirit of the Batman comics I read when I was young and it makes Gotham City alive... as if it's a character in and of itself. It's ominous yet beautiful. However, in my opinion the Nolan films have no such atmosphere. Gotham City in Nolanverse looks almost like any other city and loses its unique appeal in the process. When I watched TDK, I kept thinking that I've seen all of this before. It's basically like a copy of Heat, The Departed or any other crime film out there. This is likely what Nolan is after in his strive for "realism" but in so doing he also sacrifices the city which becomes almost as generic as the musical score.

Despite these criticisms I'd like to state once more that I do like both Burtonverse and Nolanverse Batman films. Both have their pros and cons, but I just want to point out that there are still quite a few things for Nolan to improve by the time the third Batman film hits the silver screen.

Anyways, thanks for the comments. I appreciate your thoughts. :)

I won't quote your post Kossage because it's really long and I don't want to clutter things up, but I will respond with my thoughts on your problems with the Nolan Batman movies.

Bales Batman voice didn't really bother me. In fact I liked that he tried to have such a drastic difference between his normal voice and Batman's solely because I think anyone who knew the two in either the Burton films and the Animated Series (as much as I love it) would have to be fairly stupid not to hear the similarity and start to wonder. Yes they distinguished their Batman voices from Bruce Wayne's, but not so much that I'd think they would fool anyone to be honest.

The cutting in the action scenes in the Nolan movies didn't bother me either. I do get annoyed by the fast cuts that many directors feel they have to make since the Bourne Identity, but to be honest, I had no trouble following what was going on in Nolan's movies so I can't fault him too much for it like I could other directors who have done the same.

The pacing didn't bother me in the Dark Knight either. I actually liked when they gave almost a false climax part way through. It gave you a false sense of things being wrapped up soon when in fact they were just about to really wind up and it takes you off guard. The sense of security the audience has matches how the police and Batman were undoubtedly feeling when the Joker was captured and then the :bou::bou::bou::bou: really hit the fan.

As for Gotham itself; like I said before, I actually liked the set design quite a bit in the Burton films, but I didn't mind that Gotham in Nolan's films felt like a real city. I think it served it well to be honest, and there were still touches, especially in Begins, that made it it's own and really drove home that even though it was like a real city it was a much more run down and dreary place than most. I even liked that the city itself felt cleaner and brighter through most of The Dark Knight, kind of echoing the fact that Batman did a great deal to clean the city up, and again, luring the audience into a false sense of security visually.

As for the Burton films, they really have too many problems for me to take them seriously. Jack Nicholson does a great job of playing Jack Nicholson the clown, but his portrayal of the Joker as a crazy mob boss was not true to the character. He also failed pretty miserably at coming off as menacing. Yeah he killed a bunch of people and even treated it all as one big joke, but he never really did anything that made him seem like the threat he was in the comics or as creepy and frightening as he should be. On top of that you have Bruce Wayne who is apparently so reclusive that people don't even know what he looks like, which is pretty much the opposite of how he should be portrayed given part of his cover as Batman is pretending to be an irresponsible spoiled Billionaires son. And of course, Burton had him blow up a factory full of Jokers henchman in the first one, leaving us to conclude that they all died in the blast. Maybe it was just poor editing, but having Batman kill is almost unforgivable.

I could probably go on, but it's been a few years since I watched either movie. Suffice it to say that the last time I watched Batman I laughed the whole way through at just how campy it was and how far off base most of the characters were. I won't fault someone for liking them, but I find them unwatchable these days.

Jack Nicholson is the weak link in Tim Burton's Batman, but then that's what happens when you pay an actor an obscene amount of money (he earnt something like $60 million from it apparently) and give him carte blanche to do what he wants. It might be one reason why Batman Returns is better (it's one of my favourite comic book adaptations ever), as the villains in that are stronger. As for Bruce Wayne, I don't see any problem with how he's portrayed, and I prefer Michael Keaton to Christian Bale. But then I prefer Michael Keaton as an actor anyway. In the end, Nolan and Burton are very different directors and you can see that in their Batmans - one opts for gothic tragedy, the other for gritty realism. As they say, your mileage may vary, especially if you're a fan of the comics.

(is this the batman thread now? xD)

Batman Dark Knight -
not particularly a big Batman fan, but this film was edgy, dark and pretty entertaining. However, only better than the Tim Burton movies, (the original 70s series and movie are still superior).

The Producers (2005)-
Gotta agree with Jessweeee, loved the newer one, The duo make a good team, play well off eachother.

Rebuild of Evangelion -
Everything in it is just... better.. in every way..

Super Mario All Stars -
It took all the win that is in Mario games and stuffed them all together in one cartridge, yes please!

Prince of Persia (classic) XBLA -
Released on the Xbox Live Arcade, Is a remake of the original 1989 game. The controls are so smooth and a jow to play with.

Prince of Persia (2008) -
A reboot on the entire series, I found this game also much more enjoyable to play with fluid controls and very interesting dialogue throughout.

Street Fighter Alpha 3 -
a remake of previous Alpha games, Alpha 3 has my favorite control system and art style out of all the Street Fighter games.

Casino Royale (2006) -
I was stupid enough to buy the 1967 spoof version many years earlier and it was terrible, extremely bad. This version is far superior.

Dirty Pair Flash -
Everything about it appeals more to me than the 1985 series, Designs, story scenarios and even the English dub for it, I liked. Still one of my more enjoyable 90s Animé shows to watch.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jessweeee♪

Tomb Raider: Anniversary- It's wonderful! No awkward controls, you can actually tell what everything is supposed to be, and it's all three times as big.

---

...but.. the first four games were made to be more of a puzzle game. Anniversary was childs play in comparison to the original games, no challenge at all. =[

Kossage: I agree with you completely on two points regarding The Dark Knight. First, the Batman voice was obnoxious, and I think you'll be hard-pressed to find someone that disagrees with that. Second, the pacing concern. The beginning of TDK especially was filled with these quick scenes that jumped around and it felt almost haphazardly lumped together, and when I first saw it I was starting to get concerned until the movie picked up a bit.

I do like the acting in both the original and remakes, but I think the writing (mostly character development) and villains are treated much better in the new series. You're dead-on that the villains of the original sometimes stole the spotlight from Batman that really wasn't developed as much as he could've been as a result. I also think the campy atmosphere of the original movies, while common in comic-book adaptations, took a bit away from how effective some of the typically darker Batman elements were.

Only scene in the beginning of aTDK I felt didn't belong was the robbery scene. What did it actually have to do with the movie?

I love Batman returns too.
Batman's voice didn't really bother me too much. It was realistic. The only time it sounded funny to me was at the last scene wher eBatman fell off the cliff. Of course you're going to sound a little scratchy after just falling twenty-five feet. I also doubt anyone cannot sound stupid ever trying to constantly disguise their voice.

BB and TDK were great reboots. I can't really comment on too many others though.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by charliepanayi

Argh I forgot about The Thing and The Fly :(

---

Those were the first two that popped into my head and probably the only two which I can think of at the moment. I like how they both took relatively tame films and turned them into hardcore gore fests.

Gone in 60 Seconds

*insert obvious batman reboot*

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by I'm my own MILF

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Guardian XIII

The Day the Earth Stood Still was good.

---

are you completely baked

---

*sigh* No. I liked it. It didn't completely butcher the original. I enjoy most movies for what they are.

Edit: Except for Eragon, but that wasn't a remake, just really, really :bou::bou::bou::bou:ty.

3:10 to Yuma. The ending to the original was just lame. The ending to the remake, much more believable.

The Departed. It took a while for me to think this was better than Infernal Affairs, but it's finally happened.

EDIT: Oh, also I love Elfman's music in Edward Scissorhands. His stuff is truly amazing.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Levian

I like the gloomy mood from the two first Batman movies.

---

Yeah, Burton's Batman films were good. Especially Batman Returns. The Joel Schumacher movies were terrible.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Bastian

Doctor Who.

I've watched quite a bit of the old stuff, but enjoy the new stuff sooooo much more.

Then again, it doesn't really constitute as "reboot" because it takes place chronologically after the old stuff . . . more of a sequel than a reboot.

---

It was generally classed as a reboot but *sigh*
The new series is kinda :bou::bou::bou::bou:ty.
Ok, the old series had wobbily sets and some bad scripting, but it's more often than not better than the dreadful acting (aside from Tennant & Eccleston), awful cyberman and more Deus Ex Machina than you can shake a stick at that occurs in the new series.

Seeing as how Batman, Casino Royale and BSG have been said..i'd like to add that The Incredible Hulk wasnt half bad...certainly better than Ang Lee's Hulk!

Is Pierre Morel the best man to remake Dune? | Week in geek | Film | guardian.co.uk

oh well...:confused:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ANGRYWOLF

Is Pierre Morel the best man to remake Dune? | Week in geek | Film | guardian.co.uk

oh well...:confused:

---

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

:(

SciFi Channel's remake was okay. I'm not gonna expect much from this.

Dr Who series with David Tennant and the guy before was a lot better than the 80's stuff

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Renmiri

Dr Who series with David Tennant and the guy before was a lot better than the 80's stuff

---

I loved the 80's stuff.Tom Baker was the model for Dr Who imo.

This new stuff...no so much.

I hope it does well but it fails to do anything for me.:)

Apart from the Batman stuff and The Office. I wanna add Metroid: Zero Mission. I liked it a lot more than I did on the NES and it kept going after Mother Brain was destroyed.

I thought the second Chocolate Factory was miles superior than the first. It was far more closer to the book making it more original than the original, and I though Johnny Depp did a better job than Genie Wilder. The only things that made it not that true to the book was that it gave Wonker a back story (which wasn't too bad), and that it still contained that bad guy at the start. All in all a great film. (Also - did they mean to make Johnny look like he'd just been kicked out of a Michael Jackson contest, or was that just an accident? :jess:)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ANGRYWOLF

Is Pierre Morel the best man to remake Dune? | Week in geek | Film | guardian.co.uk

oh well...:confused:

---

Wait a second. Is that Patrick Stewart in the background of that picture? The bald guy in between the two dudes fighting? I can't quite tell.



Anyway, the new Doctor Who and the old Doctor Who are both awesome, in their own ways. The new one does have a couple big problems, but I still think of them as one big show.

Problem #1: Cut the "the Doctor is merciful" crap. Yes, he is, but not that merciful. I mean, geez, he never had that much of a problem slaughtering Daleks before. Yes, he is now faced with the last remnants of their species (Again. And again. Oh, and yet again.), but seriously, it wouldn't be the first time he committed genocide, and it's the damned Daleks. How many more races do they have to wipe out in order to get back on his bad side? Every other enemy he faces, he wipes out without a problem, but the Daleks, his oldest, most implacable, most deadly, most psychotic enemy, and all of a sudden he's all "let's give peace a chance". Just kill the stupid things.

Problem #2: Cancel the Deus Ex Machina. The Bad Wolf, Torchwood, and Doctor/Donna arcs were fine. But don't overdo it. Stop dropping such painfully obvious hints about the season's final episodes throughout the season, and stop having new transcendent powers crap being pulled out to finish off the big bad at the end.

Problem #3: Drop the romantic hints. The Doctor is a nine hundred fifty year old alien. He is not going to fall for the first pretty faced human he meets. Look back on the old series, the Doctor never had a romantic connection with any of his companions. Besides, if he ever were to have a real love interest, it would pretty much have to be another Time Lord (which, given what we've seen so far, wouldn't be too surprising. I've even figured out how to bring back Romana [Romana 1, of course. Romana 2 was not worth bringing back]).

Patrick Stewart was Duncan, the Mu'adib's teacher in Dune.

Hated the Doctor Donna arch.. but maybe it is because I can't stand her.. My main passtime on her episodes is to keep hoping for her to die :p And ya, daleks have more lives than the energizer bunny.. wtf.. just die already!

Skyblade - different Doctors are different, that's the point. Ecclestone's Doctor tortured a Dalek, Tennant wasn't Ecclestone, and he wasn't any of the others before him. Doubtless Matt Smith will be different too.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by charliepanayi

Skyblade - different Doctors are different, that's the point. Ecclestone's Doctor tortured a Dalek, Tennant wasn't Ecclestone, and he wasn't any of the others before him. Doubtless Matt Smith will be different too.

---

It's annoying to watch him almost fail and get the universe nearly wiped out again and again because he is refusing to kill the Daleks, which is something none of the other Doctors would have ever blinked at. They may all be different, but they all have some shared traits as well. Both Tennant and Eccleston let the Daleks go. Which is ironic, since in one of his comments to another enemy, Tennant says "I'm so old now. I used to have so much mercy". And he wiped them out without a qualm. What, is he saving it for the one enemy that least deserves it?

And I have a feeling that Matt Smith is going to be terrible. As bad as Colin Baker, if not worse.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skyblade

...I have a feeling that Matt Smith is going to be terrible. As bad as Colin Baker, if not worse.

---

Ya, he looks to young to be "The Doctor". And way too pretty. Is like they got a boy band singer to be DR. :cry:

http://www.stuffwelike.com/stuffweli.../07/reboot.jpg

Wait, that's out already?!

Mission Impossible 4:

Tom Cruise has signed on for 'Mission Impossible IV' | EW.com

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Skyblade

Problem #1: Cut the "the Doctor is merciful" crap. Yes, he is, but not that merciful. I mean, geez, he never had that much of a problem slaughtering Daleks before. Yes, he is now faced with the last remnants of their species (Again. And again. Oh, and yet again.), but seriously, it wouldn't be the first time he committed genocide, and it's the damned Daleks. How many more races do they have to wipe out in order to get back on his bad side?

---

RTD's (Russel T. Davies) production team made it clear that the reason for this is because of the Time War that happened after the Doctor Who movie and before "Series One" of RTD's series started. Because the Doctor had to seal the Time-Lords and the Daleks away, thereby "killing" them all . . . he changed. He is not okay with killing any more.

Well. That is until the two most recent special that aired.

I am very interested to see in what direction Stephen Moffet takes the show. I suspect it might be closer to 80s stuff.

I've watched the VERY first series and didn't care much for it. I watched some other old 70s series and didn't care for it. I watched some Tom Baker stuff and liked it okay. But RTD's series are my favorite. I hope Stephen Moffet doesn't ruin it for me.

Oh, and I'm about to watch the 1996 Doctor Who movie!

@Renmiri's dislike for Donna: Really?! She was my favorite companion by FAR! Loved her so, so, so much! It's funny how we each like such opposite things about the same show.

There is no way on earth the US Remake of The Office is better than the original UK version.

It's just dumbed down & more in-your-face for the US audience who don't quite understand humour unless its rammed up their arse first.

Anyway, I'd say the movie Heat, based on the 80s movie L.A. Takedown. Does it count if the title's different? Anyway that.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cuchulainn

There is no way on earth the US Remake of The Office is better than the original UK version.

It's just dumbed down & more in-your-face for the US audience who don't quite understand humour unless its rammed up their arse first.

---

I think it's very funny, the first few seasons anyway. You make it sound like garbage like Two and a Half Men, which it patently is not. And I'm not comparing it to the UK version as they're two very different shows, which only really share a central premise.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by charliepanayi

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cuchulainn

There is no way on earth the US Remake of The Office is better than the original UK version.

It's just dumbed down & more in-your-face for the US audience who don't quite understand humour unless its rammed up their arse first.

---

I think it's very funny, the first few seasons anyway. You make it sound like garbage like Two and a Half Men, which it patently is not. And I'm not comparing it to the UK version as they're two very different shows, which only really share a central premise.

---

I dont like it, have tried to. This is not elitism. Many US comedy shows are fantastic, Family Guy & Modern Family to name 2. Oh Two & Half Men is the single worst comedy I have ever seen. I have literally no idea why its popular over there. Like How I Met Your Mother, complete :bou::bou::bou::bou:e to it's core. They are so broad Rosanne Barr could fit through them, ego and all.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Cuchulainn

There is no way on earth the US Remake of The Office is better than the original UK version.

---

I disagree. I have a history of loving BritComs (Blackadder, Monty Python, Are You Being Served?, My Family, As Time Goes By, Mr Bean . . . pretty much ANYTHING they showed us here in the States) more than my own American programs. So when I saw clips of The Office and knew it was based on a UK show, I got every episode of the UK show and laughed my arse off.

And then I watched the US version . . . and liked it a lot more.

I think the major difference is the tone. While the US version also revels in the humor of being "uncomfortable" that makes the UK version so awesome, it does so with a slightly "warmer" and kinder and wacky-er tone that I like a lot better. While I enjoyed the original UK version, I did find it a bit too abrasive at times, which is fine since that's the intent. But I could not imagine watching 5+ seasons of 22 episodes of that style of show. I think that's why it could only last the fourteen or so episodes it did in the UK.

i think we can all agree that we prefer the US version of the office over the UK version is because all the people in the latter are hideous

now that’s out of the way, the King James Bible

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Meat Puppet

i think we can all agree that we prefer the US version of the office over the UK version is because all the people in the latter are hideous

now that’s out of the way, the King James Bible

---

I may not agree with your opinion but by God I will defend my right to laugh while you make it.

US TV: Sanitise & Beautified to the point of nausia.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Meat Puppet

now that’s out of the way, the King James Bible

---

Bwahahaha! That's awesome. And so, so true.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Meat Puppet

i think we can all agree that we prefer the US version of the office over the UK version is because all the people in the latter are hideous

---

QFT

I'm going to have to agree with everyone who's said Batman and The Office.

I'd also like to add Pokemon FireRed/LeafGreen, Hellsing Ultimate and Adam Sandler's The Longest Yard.

edit: wasn't Death Race also a remake? I haven't seen the original, but Death Race was awesome.

Anything I can think of has been mentioned. How about US Godzilla??? /duck

For me probably Batman Begins/TDK they did a great job with those movies even though i still like Keaton as Batman. Spider-Man 1/2/3 i think thye did a great job with these for those that are interested Spider-Man movies where made long before the current generation, Scarface i've seen both versions and Pacino's version is superior in every way, Gone in 60 seconds once again i think Cage delivered massively in this and probably Ocean's Eleven way better then the original imo.

YouTube - A Nightmare On Elm Street (2010) Trailer #2

Somehow I don't think this will be as good as the original....:|

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ANGRYWOLF

YouTube - A Nightmare On Elm Street (2010) Trailer #2

Somehow I don't think this will be as good as the original....:|

---

It looks like it could be ok, from the look of that trailer. But I don't like Freddie's appearance...and he kinda sounds like batman.

Night of the living dead. Not the one with Captain Spaulding, the one with Candyman.

Sure people may contend that the original was a classic and touched on pressing issues of the time, but I don't really care 'bout all that.

'Gilligan's Island' headed to the silver screen? - MSN Movies News

sounds like a epic fail if you asked me.weird:p

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by ANGRYWOLF

'Gilligan's Island' headed to the silver screen? - MSN Movies News

sounds like a epic fail if you asked me.weird:p

---

o.o

the movie:

Video game incursion into Hollywood could continue with Space Invaders | 24 Frames | Los Angeles Times

rotfl...:D