Printable View
I like it. It lets cheap ass people like me not need to hope to find then hope to buy olden day games
its allowed me to play so many great games. Ff zelda super metroid. Pokemon. Great.
but some people dont like it. So where do you stand on this godsend of a creation.
(Also yay i can continue my marathon because this phone can run ff8 on psx cleanly and smoothly like my cats fur)
I used to do it as a kid because I was poor and lived in one of the world's largest gaming ghettos.
Nowadays, I really prefer to buy my games if only to show support to the company. That said, emulating something you own on your computer is A-OK, especially if you like modding or want to use some filters or other things you can't do on a console. Still, personally, i really prefer to curl up with my 3DS on a couch than emulate a game on the PC.
Ah yes. I do like console gaming too. And a few games ive emulated I do own.
but damn. I dont even have a snes let alone all the games xD.
but yep if I have the original copy. Id play the sooner than the emu umless I have a good reason to play the emu version
I'm going to take this a step farther and say that I personally believe emulation is totally fine as well if there is no option to buy older games new. Buying them used doesn't benefit the developer and if there's no way to buy it new them said developer clearly isn't interested in making money from it anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fynn
And if we're being honest, most of the people who made classic games probably aren't benefiting from many classic sales now anyway since a lot of them have likely moved to other companies, left the industry, or their companies or games were bought by other publishers, etc. I'm honestly in favour of an overhaul of IP law anyway since much of it is just absurd in the modern day, but basically, I'm not going to give anyone a hard time for emulating anything.
^^ Yeah, pretty much that.
I like to collect certain games/cartridges to satisfy that collector's mindset and also because playing the game on a console is more fun to me that on a computer.
However, if someone can't buy the game new to support the developer, then you're not stealing money from the original creators. All used cartridge money goes to the used game dealers, and that's that. It's the same thing with new old stock. I'm sure there's exceptions, but pretty much all retro games still in the wrapper still see all the money go to the owner of the game. The game was bought new ages ago, that's when the publisher got their money. Now the game is a "new" game sold through the same dealers as all the used games.
I have nothing against used game dealers, but I'm also not going to fault someone who wants to emulate something like Suikoden 2, because they can't afford to pay these types of prices for new and used games.
Although, I think Suikoden 2 is pretty cheap on some virtual consoles now, so it might not be the best example.
I'll emulate a game if it isn't available internationally (like Japan only games, ugh) with fan translations, and games that can be modded beyond the regular edition. Like Fynn, I buy games I care about to support the developers and producers.
I used to emulate all the time years ago. Now, any game I'll want to play I own a console version. It took years to collect them all, but I can't remember paying more than $70 for any game, including Suikoden II, from one used game store or another. Never use Amazon or eBay because of those crazy prices. If someone else wants to emulate then go for it
i have no problem with emulators like console emulators, i only support ROM or ISOs if the game is no longer available for under $100... but i mostly like console emulators because lets say for example i own a PS2 and a copy of FFXII, i put the game into my PS2 and it looks awful, i put it into a PS2 emulator and turn the internal resolution to 4x native and it looks beautiful .. so even though i own a PS2, i prefer to play on an emulator because i cant change the native resolution output on a physical PS2...
ROMs are pretty much the only easy way to enjoy the original versions of a lot of great RPGs for the NES and SNES if you are born and raised in Europe, like I am.
I refuse to miss those titles just because some jackass decided that we shouldn't have games like Final Fantasy 1, Final Fantasy 4, Final Fantasy 6, Chrono Trigger and Super Mario RPG, just to name a small handful of them, and I am not interested in "remakes".
There have been occasions when I have got myself some adapters and other crap so I can play American cartridges;
however, nowadays I just stick with ROMs, they seem accurate enough based on what I have played on my friends' consoles and what SNES versions look like on various YouTube videos, complete with glitches and everything else that you would find on the console versions.
Also, I never ever use Save States or Cheats - I play ROMs exactly as I would play the original consoles, with a real controller and everything.
The only diffference is that I play them on an emulator instead of on a console.
wait ff6 and co. werent in EU? damn.
really i EMU cos im too young to have bought the games when cheaper. like snes and NES
The first FF game that was released in Europe was FF7.Quote:
Originally Posted by Galuf
Thankfully they didn't do those stupid name change things and called if "FF1", that would've made the titles even more confusing than they already were.
The only RPGs that I personally remember seeing with my own eyes back in the early 90s are "Secret Of Mana" and "Final Fantasy: Mystic Quest".
But then again, I wasn't much of an RPG fan in those days.
Damn. Talk aboot learning sometjing new everyday.
Explains how my sister never played ff1 4 or 6 before the psx. In which she never liked them. Damn..
Yep, none of those games were released in Europe during the 90s.Quote:
Originally Posted by Galuf
I have no idea why, but I believe that there was some myth that "Europeans don't like RPGs that much" back then.
It wasn't a big deal at the time, though - there wasn't really any Internet back then (at least nothing near the kind of Internet that we are familiar with today - it was certainly not something that ordinary people would just have access to at home, I believe Internet started to become well-known in 1995 and truly pick up in 1998 or so), so it was kinda hard to know exactly which games were released in other parts of the world.
The best way to find out about games from other parts of the world was by reading video game magazines or something, like "Nintendo Power" that Americans fondly remember.
Now that I have things like disposable income, I don't emulate unless I have no access to the game at all in any way - such as a lack of English release, or it is an old game that was never re-released.
Consoles are certainly the best choice if you actually have easy access to them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Shauna
The thing that bothers me to no end though is when some great games are never released in some parts of the world, so that you are forced to buy adapters and all kinds of weird extra stuff just to be able to play the goddamn games.
For example, I had to buy that awkward "Fire Converter" thing for my SNES about 8 years ago in order to be able to play an American SNES copy of FF6.
Thankfully, nowadays video games are mainstream enough so that most games are released everywhere around the world, which is nice.
I'll usually buy a game I like through a virtual store out of convenience. But I also like to emulate for customizable options that official emulation doesn't offer, not to mention for games that won't be released officially.
I used to emulate a lot, and I very much enjoyed it. Emulation is wonderful up until the PS2 era, and I would emulate a lot of old games still if my other half wasn't particularly shallow about how the games I play look. Before the PS2 stage, things are flawless, and you can actually play games with them looking better than they ever did on the consoles they were originally made for. But then once you hit PS2 things just get really broken and hard to replicate. Some games people have managed to emulate flawlessly, looking amazingly better than they ever could on the original hardware (I played the entirety of Final Fantasy XII via emulation at 1080p and it was a phenomenal experience) while others are just never quite right.
I see nothing wrong with emulating if that's what you want to do, but I'd prefer to play an officially released updated version (i.e., HD remasters, new ports, etc) over emulating. Not because I care about giving a company money for a decade+ old game, but because I just like when everything works as intended with nothing having to be unofficially rigged or worked around.
Another thing I want to say about emulation that I know I've mentioned before but forgot to be: it's essentially the only viable method we have to preserve older titles.
Major companies simply don't have enough interest in properly preserving their games for the future (see every HD release of relatively recent games where they didn't have final source code to work from, documentation was trout, backups had to be found that were half ruined, etc. for examples of what I mean and keep in mind those are largely PS2 games made in the last 15 years), no physical media will last forever. Some, even more recent CD based games, are at our past the end of their expected lives. If it weren't for peoples efforts in emulation I have no doubt we wouldn't have nearly as many games available in ROM or iso form and even fewer ways to play them.
Almost breaks my heart to think of how many games we might still have already lost.
Have you bought a Sega Genesis recently? Most of them have aged to where AC adapters have to be in juuuuuuuuuuuuuuust the right spot or it doesn't retain power.
I always buy the new titles so to support the developer. However if it is a game I own, or if I can't get it new I will emulate. But If it is a new title I will never just steal it as if they don't get the sales they will stop making great games for us. It's simple business.
You know I've never really thought about that but it's a good point. There would probably be several games at this point that no one could play at all if not for emulation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivi22
To sort of add to this, I sometimes emulate simply because it is easier. Hey, I'm running my personal laptop through my HDTV most of the time. I can click a couple of times and have a game running no problem with controller support. It's a lot quicker than digging out my NES. And even if I did, I don't trust game with battery back up for saves at this point. Yes, I know you can change the battery, but really, I'm not going to do that.Quote:
Originally Posted by DMKAYou know I've never really thought about that but it's a good point. There would probably be several games at this point that no one could play at all if not for emulation.Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivi22
I've found that Virtual Consoles and digital distribution have done a lot to nullify this trend, fortunately. It's getting harder and harder to find games that don't have some form of official distribution (or are older PC games that are officially abandonware and available on plenty of sites for free).Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivi22
I would take this one step farther myself and make an argument about companies not making a good enough effort to make things conveniently available. Virtual Console is about the best argument one could make, and even that is locked to a couple of Nintendo products. The best anyone could hope for is that everyone puts all their stuff onto Steam; since most people have a computer. Not everyone has a Wii(U), and not every game is available on Virtual ConsoleQuote:
Originally Posted by Vivi22I'm going to take this a step farther and say that I personally believe emulation is totally fine as well if there is no option to buy older games new. Buying them used doesn't benefit the developer and if there's no way to buy it new them said developer clearly isn't interested in making money from it anyway.Quote:
Originally Posted by Fynn
And if we're being honest, most of the people who made classic games probably aren't benefiting from many classic sales now anyway since a lot of them have likely moved to other companies, left the industry, or their companies or games were bought by other publishers, etc. I'm honestly in favour of an overhaul of IP law anyway since much of it is just absurd in the modern day, but basically, I'm not going to give anyone a hard time for emulating anything.
If nobody is making a good effort to make their ancient game available and convenient then they just don't want that money. I don't even emulate much these days. I'm one of those that's come into an expendable income so it's become less of an issue, but I still find nothing wrong with it when other convenient alternatives are a rarity, and like most people have said, the developers themselves aren't getting compensation, and aren't getting stolen from
I already own pretty much everything I've ever emulated. CASE IN POINT: Xenoblade Chronicles. I bought a Wii specifically for that game. I get it home and find out my Wii can't play dual layer DVDs.
So yeah, I'm not going to feel guilty about that one.
More well known games is agree with you. But there are entire consoles and large chunks of popular console libraries that aren't available as digital downloads and I'd washer most of them never will be. And I doubt it'll stop being an issue in the future. The majority of PSX and PS2 games really aren't available and probably never will be due to lack of interest and the difficulty that still exists in tailoring am emulator to every single PS2 digital rerelease.Quote:
Originally Posted by SkybladeI've found that Virtual Consoles and digital distribution have done a lot to nullify this trend, fortunately. It's getting harder and harder to find games that don't have some form of official distribution (or are older PC games that are officially abandonware and available on plenty of sites for free).Quote:
Originally Posted by Vivi22
And I'm the mean time, like I said, companies are just losing the means to port these games left and right. The HD silent Hill collection didn't have the compete source code backed up and had to try to finish it before porting (hence why it still doesn't work properly) when they did the HD release for the original Killzone I believe they stumbled on a backup of the code at someone's house if I'm not mistaken. And then they still had to spend a bunch of time figuring out how that original code worked because the documentation was so bad no one knew what a bunch of the object classes even related to anymore.
Game archival is a complete crap shoot outside of the emulation scene. At least they've got some consistency within a platform.
It's an absolute necessity to keep gaming history alive. The companies themselves don't seem to be interested in this in the slightest, so it's up to the users to make sure there's always a way to play a game.
TBH sony should just make sure the PS5 is strong enough to run PCSX2 and license that that to supply BC for every PS2 game, but they're not gonna do that because there's not enough money in it.
It's very rare I touch emulators these days. The exception is generally for old FFs if I replay them (I have paid for them on PSN but I prefer having the fast forward button at times), or for games like Pokémon which I like to have ROM hacks for so I can catch all Pokémon in one game.
For the most part, I only emulate under three conditions:
1. It's a game I already own but I want to try out fan mods.
2. A game I own, but it's the original version and the parent company has no intention of ever releasing anything but the remake versions. (Like FFII and III)
3. Some obscure game that has a snowball's chance in hell of ever being released outside of it's home country. (Sailor Moon RPG and Rudra no Hiou)
I really cannot agree with the statement that "emulators don't feel he same as the cartridges", I think they feel pretty much exactly the same as long as I am using a real controller and ignore any emulator features (State-saves, cheat codes etc).
Also, I have yet to notice any big differences between the ROM versions and the cartridge versions.
I can even play in sync with YouTube videos of cartridge versions (yes, I have tried that), and I can keep the exactly same pace and they seem to have the exactly same colour palettes etc etc etc (I even experience the same random glitches, like for example the disappearing boss on the stage "Rat Race" in BattleToads).
There are certainly no obvious differences, let's just put it that way - I highly doubt that annyone would be able to tell the difference between a cartridge version and its respective ROM version if they didn't get any obvious clues.
A lot of roms feel like they have a longer delay between the button press and the action happening on the screen in certain genres. It's only a slight difference, but when you have a lifetime of experience on the cartridge and and switch to the rom, it can mess with your instincts and take adjusting to get used to. One example I've certainly noticed it on is Mario Bros. It's happened with both keyboard and controller imput on various computers spanning the last 20 or so years.