Hey! Whats everyones opinion on the games? My favorite is probably FF10 , not just because of the graphics but i like the story. I dont really care for FF8.
:p :tongue: ;)
Printable View
Hey! Whats everyones opinion on the games? My favorite is probably FF10 , not just because of the graphics but i like the story. I dont really care for FF8.
:p :tongue: ;)
My favourite is FF9, but the best in my opinion is FF6. The worst game is definitely FF10. I can't really understand what people think is so great about it, besides the graphics.
Just to let you know, this question has been asked a million times. However I don't mind giving a proud answer every time.
FF6 is the best! :D
FFX is the worst :mad:
It's like I'm in one of those movies when the guy wakes up in the same day... Well...
Best: FF6
Worst :FF8
Best: FF6
Worst:FF8 (This doesn't mean I hate it, its just my least favorite.)
Dude.. groundhog day.Quote:
Originally posted by Outsider
It's like I'm in one of those movies when the guy wakes up in the same day... Well...
Best: FF6
Worst :FF8
Anyway, FF6 is best, FF8 sucks a lot.
I just want to say that it means that I hate FF8...Quote:
Originally posted by Outsider
Worst :FF8
I dunno, sometimes I think that the word "hate" is not strong enough to show my feelings about that game.
Best: VI
Worst: VIII. And yes, like Outsider, I hate this game.
Best : VII
Worst : IX
Best: VIII (to each their own eh? Still, to have such a strong feeling as hate for a game?)
Worst: IV: (It's... passable at first, but near the ending it just gets... meh)
Most overrated: VI (Sure, it was good for it's time, but the BEST? COme on... Ah well... to each their own)
I'm hopping on the bandwagon! :pQuote:
Originally posted by i90east
FF6 is the best! :D
FFX is the worst :mad:
Another one of these?
Favorite: FF7
Least Favorite: FFX
*thinks the same as Sephiroth1999AD* But hey I'll answer anyway..
Fave: Ahhh it's so hard cos I like FFIX, FFVII & FFX equally. I love them all for different reasons! At the time when I was playing each one it was my fave. And I still can't decide! Sorry :love:
Least fave: Maybe FFVIII, I haven't beaten it yet though, and I don't hate it I just like the system in it the least (drawing magic, no equipping, the way you get money, few other things).
But... I like to find things to enjoy in them all, they're all FF's so they all rock very much imo :thumb:
I hate it for its name... I KNOW that there are worse games than FF8 (c'mon, I played Brandish, Eye Of The Beholder and some other crap)...Quote:
Originally posted by Rand Al'Tor
Best: VIII (to each their own eh? Still, to have such a strong feeling as hate for a game?)
Worst: IV: (It's... passable at first, but near the ending it just gets... meh)
Most overrated: VI (Sure, it was good for it's time, but the BEST? COme on... Ah well... to each their own)
But FF8 will be forever something that ruined "Final Fantasy" name for me... Seriously, until then I just couldn't believe that Square could make a bad FF.
And FF6 can be a lot of things, but NEVER overrated... It's, actually, the most underrated FF I know, because it's amazing, and it's usually put behind FF7 or FF8 (I just can't believe it).
EDIT - FF4.... passable... PASSABLE? You can't be serious... It's one of the best RPGs EVER...
Outsider is right. There's no way that FFVI is overrated. Just because most people in this thread know it's the best FF doesn't make it overrated. FFVI earns it's recognition as the best FF. If you really want to go into details, my FF comparo post is here (it contains a few spoilers for FF6 & FF7):
http://www.fflegend.com/forums/showt...5&pagenumber=2
I challenge anyone who doesn't think FF6 is the best to come up with an explanation as to why not. Don't come out and say "this FF has better graphics" or "this FF is newer", because that will only hurt your case.
Most - VII - Everything about this game keeps me glued to it. It's easy enough that I can just start the game and head straight for the ending with minimal levelling, but not so difficult that you have to return to an inn every three battles. The story is just great and performs key events really well.
Least - VI - It's all right, it has it's moments and a few good plot twists and characters. I just hate how they put 14 playable characters in this game. We rarely saw relationships form between characters, or even expanded personalities. Also there's no lead roll - there's a reason why most books, games, movies or stories in general have a lead roll, yet FFVI lacked one. No one seemed to have the leadership qualities all groups should have. It just seemed like a band of random heroes crammed together to me. The characters were pretty decent; they just didn't flesh them out enough. Heck most of the time they just made dialogue boxes without names attached, so anyone could say the lines that needed to be said. This just shows that in the end all their personalities are the same, despite how well done they were at the beginning of their quest.
Why FFVI isn't the best. In my opinion.
Just so you know I played it on the PSX and not the SNES version as it was never released in Europe.
First thing I didn't like was the fact I had been to every town on the world map and had an Airship after about 10hrs. Which makes the world seem a very small place with very few places to explore.
As mentioned before the lack of a main/lead character was annoying as the group seem like it was just thrown together. Terra is supposed to be the main character of FFVI yet for the most part of the game you don't even have to use her if you don't want to. There was no real interaction between the characters in the group apart from Celes & Locke, Sabin & Edgar and even then there wasn't that much there.
I also think theres to many playable characters alot of them which arn't really needed. Gau, Umaro, Relm, Stargo, Mog and Gogo. Others weren't even worth using as there was already someone else who could do similar things. Locke was usless for me. He can steel, bothered. Cyan had the sword techs which were good but you had to stand there like a muppet waiting for the bar to go up to use the higher ones. I'll just use Sabin and this Blitz thanks. Shadow was ok but then he turns up when he feels like it for the most part and disappears when he wants to. Usually when you could do with him. Like when you goto the Phantom Forest. He left before I got there so had to fight that train thing with only two characters. Which was nice. :p
The battle system was ok but not as good as in other FF games. You just use the same few moves over and over again and cure when needed. Most of the Espers are usless as the magic they give you isn't worth even equiping them.
Don't get me wrong, I like FFVI. I just don't think it's as good as everyone says. Maybe if Nintendo had released VI in Europe for the SNES back in the mid ninetys then I may have a different opinion. But they didn't ('Cos we don't like RPG's in Europe. Oh thanks for deciding that for me Nintendo/Square) so FFVII was the first one in the series I ever played and I still play it now after all these years. Theres just nothing wrong with it imo.
You usually fall in love with the first FF you play. If it's VII, that's usually your favorite. Of all the things... lack of series character group save for a few people, shallow characters, etc, can also be said about VII. Or IV. Or X. VI will always be my favorite, and it was my first, and the greatest in my opinion. I think there's a lot of character growth, even in the WoR, and you can usually learn how characters feel about eachother by talking to them on the airship. (Oh, and by the way NM, Shadow will leave as late as Barren falls, it all depends. I usually get to keep him throughout the entire Phantom Forest deal)
I like the simple battle system, I dont need tons of limit breaks and flashy summons (which are pretty, but the length is terrible after a while). Though as for the magic... most of it is the standard in all FF games. There were a few useless spells, but those have been in many many games.
Aobonomatrix may be correct. VIII was my first.
Now, onto the dethroning of VI.
First of all, when I say 'best' I mean 'most fun for ME' I consider this all to be entirely subjective. But I'll just add what I thought FFVI lacked.
The idea is good at the basis, and so are the characters. Problem is that I feel like little or nothing is done with them. Take Gau. The concepyt is great, I LOVE the concept. When I started with him I was pretty happy. Problem? Gau has..what 20 lines in the wole game? And compared to the likes of Mog and Umaro he never even shuts his yap. And don't get me started on Gogo. Even the'core characters' (Terra, Locke, Edgar, Celes, Sabin, Setzer) get some kind of subquest (one in WOB, one in WOR) and a cutscene or two and that's it. Most of the reactions to the story are 'general' When I hardly ever hear the characters speak, it doesn't help my entrancement in the game. Squall and company.... they give their oppinion on everything they come across. And that is NOT a technical issue. Chrono Trigger magnificently has the characters drawn out (so it's not just an old-school VS new-school thing. If you would have asked what the best Square RPG was, I'd be pretty unsure)
... Yeah, Squall and his fellas just couldn't shut their hole for a while, so I couldn't enjoy that horrible storyline...
Anyway, I strongly disagree with that "My first FF is the best"... That's why I try to analyse the games I play in a more technical way... BTW, my first FF was FF4, and my favourite is FF6.
The lack of a main character is what made the game so great in my opinion... it totally changes the concept of the game, so we have a storyline that gets the main spot, not the characters. And it's great, cuz the storyline is too damn good. Anyway, if I wanted to see only some character interaction, I would go watch a soap opera, not play a RPG. And that's another reason why I hate FF8, it's like I'm playing a soap opera. ARGH!
And it's incredible how the "main" characters (Terra, Celes, Locke, Sabin, Edgar, Cyan and Setzer) are well developed even though they never bored me to death talking about every single thing they came across... And those few lines that any character could say are well placed, and only happen in a few dialogues, mostly in the middle of quests. Anyway, you can still get enough character interaction in the sidequests and in the cutscenes.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Outsider
... Yeah, Squall and his fellas just couldn't shut their hole for a while, so I couldn't enjoy that horrible storyline...Quote:
At least when they talked, it was SOMEONE who talked instead of 'the mistery voice' that said general things and told us NOTHING of the characters.
Eh...analasys. You take joy where you can get it. No need to justify enjoying a game.Quote:
Anyway, I strongly disagree with that "My first FF is the best"... That's why I try to analyse the games I play in a more technical way... BTW, my first FF was FF4, and my favourite is FF6.
Probvlem is that TO ME, a story without good characters can be as well hought out as you like. It's uninteresting. If I don't care about the peoplke of that world, I don't care about what happens to them.Quote:
The lack of a main character is what made the game so great in my opinion... it totally changes the concept of the game, so we have a storyline that gets the main spot, not the characters.
With all due respect. FFVI has a decent storyline, but i don't see what's the big hullaballoo. [spoiler] Evil empire wants to conquer world and abuse magical powers by exploiting magical race. Subordinate of evil empire grabs power for himself and instals himself of ruler of the world despite heroes resistance. One year later the heroes go and defeat himQuote:
And it's great, cuz the storyline is too damn good.
But soap operas are not NEARLY as human as the FFVIII (or VII or CT for that matter) characters. Nor do they have interesting worlds and stories.Quote:
Anyway, if I wanted to see only some character interaction, I would go watch a soap opera, not play a RPG. And that's another reason why I hate FF8, it's like I'm playing a soap opera. ARGH!
They didn't 'bore' me. They did strike me as completely superficial. A (good) background, some quirks, and that's it. True, FFVIII characters have a pretty shallow background, but at least they're USED. Nothing frustrates me as having an admittedly cool character as Setzer just go through most of the game without saying a single word. If you're gonna raise my interest in a character, DO something with it. As it is, they left me with a rather frustrated feeling.Quote:
And it's incredible how the "main" characters (Terra, Celes, Locke, Sabin, Edgar, Cyan and Setzer) are well developed even though they never bored me to death talking about every single thing they came across...
Enough for you, but not for me. And I did go through walkthroughs (so I did Gau's scene with his dad for example) And part of the problem is perhaps the dialogue that weren't always translated as good as later FF's (and the translations are part of the game WE play, so that counts against quality)Quote:
And those few lines that any character could say are well placed, and only happen in a few dialogues, mostly in the middle of quests. Anyway, you can still get enough character interaction in the sidequests and in the cutscenes.
Favorite: FF6 was by far my favorite. There were a lot of unique things in the game(like the 3 person scenario after the Lete River) that I was a big fan of. All of the world locations were interesting. It has also had the right amount of comedy, especially with Ultros.
Least Favorite: FF9. I found this game to be really boring. A lot of the places you visit are so dull, and for a long time FF player it seemed like they re-used old FF ideas way too much. I also thought the introduction of Necron was totally lame. At least the other Final Fantasies make you slowly build a hatred towards the end boss throughout the game. Necron just comes out of nowhere, and he is just not fun to fight as he has hardly any story behind him.
Since there are 14 characters, yes each character gets less individual attention. What you get is a multitude of stories coming from almost every character, bringing together a colorful experience. Out of the said characters, they all hold some anguish inside of them which is brought of closure later in the game. That's not enough developement? Most of their stories give you a glimpse of their past too. The rest is left to the imagination. I don't see where there's a lack of developement like some of you are claiming. As far as dialogue goes, have you ever seen the entire dialogue of the game in one document? It's huge. Most players would rather be playing than reading. That's what books are for. So your favorite character didn't talk much... oh well. There's plenty of dialogue coming from all characters as a whole, which contributes to that colorful blend I was talking about earlier.
Why should the player be forced to use a "lead" character, and over-endulge in his/her story? What if you don't really like the main character? Now you have a game with an overly-complicated story about a character you don't even like. Take Cloud for example. Sure he looked cool, but I thought his personality was rather boring for a supposed leader. Barret had a more colorful personality than Cloud, and most FF6 characters did too.
Without having a main character that you're forced to use al the time, it gives you the freedom to use anyone you want. There are a total of 56 different party combinations for you to choose from. Combine that with the multitude of available relics and equipment, and the possibilities are exponentially high.
Throughout the WoB there were characters who stepped up and led the group. Edgar, Bannon and Locke are 3 such characters. In the WoR it was clear what they needed to do, and most characters were battling with personal problems at the time. Sure the dialogue doesn't show much leadership in the WoR, but it wasn't really neccessary either.
MOST of the time? Excuse me? What game are you playing?Quote:
Heck most of the time they just made dialogue boxes without names attached, so anyone could say the lines that needed to be said.
Well that seems to indicate that you haven't played through the entire game. Whether you have or not, the above statement is false.Quote:
First thing I didn't like was the fact I had been to every town on the world map and had an Airship after about 10hrs. Which makes the world seem a very small place with very few places to explore.
Since when was variety a bad thing? If there are characters that you don't like, don't use them. How does that hurt the game? All characters are worth using if you're willing to utilize their positive attributes. All of the special abilities are unique, and all characters have different stats. Some are geared more towards physical combat while others are best with magic. You can put together any combination you like. Again, how does this hurt the game?Quote:
I also think theres to many playable characters alot of them which arn't really needed... ...Others weren't even worth using as there was already someone else who could do similar things.
Poor micromanagement. If you have Cyan attack last, no one waits. Also have a character with you who attacks automatically, and have that person attack first (also equip RunningShoes). That provides the best battle flow, and allows Cyan to charge up his powerful attacks without disruption.Quote:
Cyan had the sword techs which were good but you had to stand there like a muppet waiting for the bar to go up to use the higher ones.
Gee, I didn't know that in other FF games the characters use hundreds of different routine attacks. Their battle commands must scroll several screens in length! :whoa:Quote:
You just use the same few moves over and over again and cure when needed.
I played FFMQ and FF4 before playing FF6, and yet I'm able to recognize that FF6 is far superior. It's fine to fall in love with the first FF you play, but to call it the best just because it was your first FF, that's just wrong.Quote:
You usually fall in love with the first FF you play.
So that automatically makes FFVIII a superior game? That's questionable reasoning. Before you say "I never said that", you're using that as your argument for "the dethroning of VI".Quote:
Squall and company.... they give their oppinion on everything they come across. And that is NOT a technical issue.
I felt that the characters in FFVI were well established, and I cared what happened to them. Perhaps you never really got into the game in any emotional capacity.Quote:
I don't care about what happens to them.
It's just as complex as any other FF story, if not more so. All good vs. evil stories highlight things such as love, justice and other aspects of positive morality vs. greed, a desire for power and the status of godliness, a disregard for innocence, and other aspects of absolute negative morality. I don't see how FFVI's story is lacking in any way. At the end of the game it becomes clear why Kefka did what he did. The things he said couldn't have been further from the truth. He was living by a false set of values. It's not like there was a lack of reasoning for the actions of the characters (with the only exception being Gogo). I actually found the abuse of magic to be quite an interesting aspect of the story.Quote:
Evil empire wants to conquer world and abuse magical powers by exploiting magical race. Subordinate of evil empire grabs power for himself and instals himself of ruler of the world despite heroes resistance. One year later the heroes go and defeat him .
The game has enough side quests of which boost the characters' stories. Do you want the characters to spew out their life stories after every battle or something? Excessive dialogue is best left to the imagination.Quote:
If you're gonna raise my interest in a character, DO something with it. As it is, they left me with a rather frustrated feeling.
i90east.
You have your opinion and others have theres. Your just gonna have to accept that fact that people don't agree on everything.
One person like one thing another like's something else, thats just the way it is. You can type a 1,000 word post on why you like FFVI best of all but it isn't going to make every FF fan out there change there mind and accept your point of view.
Maybe for you. For me it was all beginnings, with nothing but a rushed conclusion. And little in between.Quote:
Originally posted by i90east
Since there are 14 characters, yes each character gets less individual attention. What you get is a multitude of stories coming from almost every character, bringing together a colorful experience.
My magination needs SOMETHING to work with.Quote:
Out of the said characters, they all hold some anguish inside of them which is brought of closure later in the game. That's not enough developement? Most of their stories give you a glimpse of their past too. The rest is left to the imagination.
If you mix all colours together you get BLAND. That's what the 'general dialogue' is. Bland stuff like 'The gate is opening' which every character can say. Totally uninteresting.Quote:
I don't see where there's a lack of developement like some of you are claiming. As far as dialogue goes, have you ever seen the entire dialogue of the game in one document? It's huge. Most players would rather be playing than reading. That's what books are for. So your favorite character didn't talk much... oh well. There's plenty of dialogue coming from all characters as a whole, which contributes to that colorful blend I was talking about earlier.
Disagree absolutely. I have no great love for CLoud either, but he did come to life for me more then all the bland FFVI 'statistics with a name and backstory'Quote:
Why should the player be forced to use a "lead" character, and over-endulge in his/her story? What if you don't really like the main character? Now you have a game with an overly-complicated story about a character you don't even like. Take Cloud for example. Sure he looked cool, but I thought his personality was rather boring for a supposed leader. Barret had a more colorful personality than Cloud, and most FF6 characters did too.
What does that MATTER when the only difference is that there's other pictures moving? Yes, I KNOW they couldn't have added dialogue for every single character. Which is why they should have cut OUT about half of them. I could have done WITHOUT Mog, Umaro, gogo, Relm and Strago. They didn't add anything to the game.Quote:
Without having a main character that you're forced to use al the time, it gives you the freedom to use anyone you want. There are a total of 56 different party combinations for you to choose from. Combine that with the multitude of available relics and equipment, and the possibilities are exponentially high.
The dialogue didn't show much AT ALL.I mean...have you checked Gau? He just hasn't seen his friends for a year and all he says is the same stuff he ALWAYS says in the Veldt. And even when something IS done, it's all rushed.Quote:
Throughout the WoB there were characters who stepped up and led the group. Edgar, Bannon and Locke are 3 such characters. In the WoR it was clear what they needed to do, and most characters were battling with personal problems at the time. Sure the dialogue doesn't show much leadership in the WoR, but it wasn't really neccessary either.
I ahve actually. I may remmeber it false, but most talking was either general talk or just the other character talking to you and you giving a response from a list now and then. Compared to the later FF's, it was pretty bad.Quote:
MOST of the time? Excuse me? What game are you playing?
Well that seems to indicate that you haven't played through the entire game. Whether you have or not, the above statement is false.
It does dethrone it as the 'game better in all regards then the others' If such issues mean next to nohing to YOU and others, fine. But don't be amazed when the rest of us are less enthusiast over FFVI and consider it 'so-so' compared to the later FF's. As I said in my first post 'to each their own'.Quote:
So that automatically makes FFVIII a superior game? That's questionable reasoning. Before you say "I never said that", you're using that as your argument for "the dethroning of VI".
Right, while VII, VIII, X and even friggen' IX managed to do that. (okay, VI DID have some good scenes, but it lags behind to all the later ones in term of emotional attachedness) And if you ask me, that's enough to make a game lose MANY, MANY points in MY book. The characters don't feel 'real' enough to captivate my emotions.Quote:
I felt that the characters in FFVI were well established, and I cared what happened to them. Perhaps you never really got into the game in any emotional capacity.
[uote] It's just as complex as any other FF story, if not more so. All good vs. evil stories highlight things such as love, justice and other aspects of positive morality vs. greed, a desire for power and the status of godliness, a disregard for innocence, and other aspects of absolute negative morality. I don't see how FFVI's story is lacking in any way. At the end of the game it becomes clear why Kefka did what he did. The things he said couldn't have been further from the truth. He was living by a false set of values. It's not like there was a lack of reasoning for the actions of the characters (with the only exception being Gogo). I actually found the abuse of magic to be quite an interesting aspect of the story. [/quote]
It's not bad, not bad a all. But literature it ain't. Point is that some act like the plot of FFVI is miles above the plots of the other ones, and I just don't feel that way. VI is in the same boat with IV, V and to a point, VIII in terms of plot. If you would say VII had the superior plot I'd concede that.
If I have to imagine the dialogue for a character I need to know how the character speaks and acts (towards specific members as well) first. I need SOMETHING to work with. And the cutscenes and side quests are pretty barren ground.Quote:
The game has enough side quests of which boost the characters' stories. Do you want the characters to spew out their life stories after every battle or something? Excessive dialogue is best left to the imagination.
Look. You like FFVI and that's good for you. I am no saying that on an objective scale VIII is better then VI. There IS no objective scale on 'good game'. There's only 'like and dislike' It's just that many people act like VI IS undeniably better then VIII. And anyone who disagrees is just a shallow person that si easily distracted by eye candy. That is why I said it was overrated.
Okay, okay, we get it. i90east loves FFVI and Rand Al'Tor doesn't. Both of you are just reiterating your points over and over again. Neither of you is going to change the other's mind about FFVI so please stop trying to. The thread asks which Final Fantasy is your favorite and which is your least favorite. I think we've figured that out.
Sorry if I'm over stepping my bounds or mod-whoring but this thread is giving me a headache. :(
:laugh: Yes Dude, stop us now before this turns into a 5 month debate. I've already done that once this year.
I'm not trying to say that FFVI is perfect. No FF is. Rand Al'Tor has pointed out some of the game's downfalls. Overall I believe that FFVI provides the best experience both from a rational and subjective perspective. I finally got some people to say what they don't like about FFVI. Past attempts have been unsuccessful. Thanks guys.
What's wrong with 5 months debates? :D ;) (<- can yap over the smallest things for eternity)
Still, this definately is the wrong thread for it I guess. Note BTW that I DO think FFVI is a GOOD game. The best SNES FF at the very least.
FF10 is the best it is really cool with the graphics and the fact that there are actors this time. As well as the summoning system that rules.
FF2 is the worst. It is just to hard.
Best: I'm stuck between 6 and 7. They're both quite compelling, both have amazing stories, and the battle systems are great, also.
Worst: FFX. I honestly do not see how people could like this even a tiny bit. Sure when you first pick it up it is amazing, but after the first 10 hours of the game, it is just so ridiculously repetitive. I don't know how or why, but I somehow got to the last dungeon. I also heard online that the last dungeon has (SPOILER)more of those ridiculous orb puzzles. Graphics? Like everyone else, they blew me away. Every cut-scene blew my mind away. But, because of the amazing graphics games today produce, we sometimes forget that what makes games great aren't graphics, but the gameplay and the story. The sphere grid thing was a decent idea, I suppose, but once everything's been done, there's no difference between the characters except for their overdrives.
As for the characters.... I'd have to say that they were borderline decent and horrible. Tidus was probably the worst FF main character I've ever had the misfortune of coming across. He's basically any ordinary hero. He's a hero that was, in the beginning, a normal guy that only cares about his life then suddenly becomes Mr. I-R-TEH-SEERIUS-HEERO-GOYS! I'm too lazy to go in depth about the other characters, but if anyone wants me to, I will.
Story? Out of all of the garbage, this is the only un-adulterated thing in FFX. Overall, the plot was pretty decent. Though, not as good as I had originally hoped it would be, it kept me going, I suppose.
its a tie
FAV-
ff 10- graphics/story
ff 7- story/very fun to play
NON FAV-
ff 9- i HATE it and for all i care it can burn in...........sorry
:chop:
this
is
ff 9
^-^ lmao
anyway FF7 by a longshot for me, then Tactics, then FFX, then FFVIII, then FF9 it was a good game but not as good as all the others IMHO
Best
1:FF5 and 6
2:FF9
3:FF7
WORST EVER WAS FFX....AHHHHHHHHHHHH KILL KILL KILL....KILL KILL KILL...lol sorry. I guess I didnt like it all that much other than it had blitzball which is kinda like soccer *yay* and it had nice, very nice graphics. *did not like TIDUS....>...>..>>..>>>>>>>KILL*
I swear I posted here before.
Favorites
FFVI ---> Darn, the debate ended? Sad...
FFTactics ---> It's good ya!
FFIX ---> Glad to see Classic FF in PSX
Hate-orites
FFX ---> BURNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
FFVIII could be in my h8 list but it rised one step higher. Lucky stiff...
Favorite: FF7 (My favorite game of all time, narrowly beating out Star Ocean: The Second Story)
Least Favorite: FF3j (Probably one of the worst RPG's I've ever played, just a bit better than Beyond the Beyond and Golden Sun.
Best: FFVI...but FFIV is a close second
Worst/Most Overrated: FFVII
Favorite: IX. Possibly the only RPG I've ever played that I'll gladly play through in full a second, third, forth time.
There weren't really any FFs that I all out hated... but there were several I don't really give a hoot about. V was the least interesting to me, but I never played through a sufficient amount of the game to deem it as my least favorite so I say VII. Not really a bad game, just a tad bit over-rated.
My favourites are 4, 6 and 7. I'm not a very big fan of 2.
Geez, alot of you guys haven't even played them all!
I'd say OVERALL the best for me is currently Final Fantasy VIII.
And the worst would definitely be Final Fantasy II (Famicom). The Level up system was trash and only the hardest of the hardcore can beat it.
I have a good feeling I'm gonna LOVE Final Fantasy XII!
i THink FF7 was the best game with the best story and characters.
The wrost game by far has to be FF10. I hate tidus because he's a whimp, every one knows that auron was the hero of that game. Haw is it that one second tidus cant even swat at monsters and keep his balance but the next he can wield a sword against countless enimies. I never finished ten because my brother beat me to it and i saw the ending. Another dumb part of the game. The only thing tidus is good for is gaining levels in Kingdom Hearts.:mad2:
Best: FFVI (enough said, I agree with i90)
#2: FFVIII (yes I liked this game a whole bunch, thought the story was intriguing even if Squall goes from stiff to sissy and Riona is annoying)
#3: FFIV (the first real FF I played, I started with Mystic Quest)
Worst: FF2. Damn it sucked. Bad story and terrible leveling system. Even if they upgraded the music and graphics to FFX levels.
FFXI: Too expensive. I'll never play it.
Note: I have not played FFIX or FFX (well I played the first hour of FFX and was impressed by the graphics and gameplay.... can't comment on characters or story).
i agree one hundred percent.Quote:
Originally posted by i90east
Just to let you know, this question has been asked a million times. However I don't mind giving a proud answer every time.
FF6 is the best! :D
FFX is the worst :mad:
not that X was HORRIBLE...it was just my least favorite.
I Really Liked 10 It Had A Good Story Line To It And Good Chars
The Worst Would Be 8 I Didn't Like It All That Much
If X had been on the the PlayStation instead of the PS2, it would have been really lame. I think the graphics and voices is was earned it the points.
FF X was brill cos Tidus is just HOT!! :love: I liked FF8 but it wos kind of a disapointment. :(
I LUV TIDUS I LUV TIDUS I LUV TIDUS I LUV TIDUS I LUV TIDUS I LUV TIDUS!!
I LUV TIDUS!!!
HE IS NOT A DAMN WHIMP COS HE IS SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO HOT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2: :love: :mad2: :mad2: :mad2:
Please don't double post. Please don't revive dead topics. Please cool it on the smilies. ~Gau