The Conservative Party of EoFF -- Because All The Other Parties Are Dumb

Let's show these fools how things are done, shall we?

Introducing the Conservative Party of Eyes On Final Fantasy, bringing new features to the political map of EoFF--intelligence, experience, and competence.

Platform
-Ban or Kill Stupid People
-Fiscal Responsibility
-Make left-leaning losers get jobs or else starve
-Set fire to anybody too lazy to type out long words like "you" and "are"
-Bobbittize PG
-Run spears through people who use more than ten smilies per post

Current members:

Cabinet
Leader: Citizen Bleys
Chief of the EGG: Doomgaze
Minister of Random and Senseless Violence: Raistlin
Minister of Jabbing People With Pointy Spears: DocFrance
Minister of Ninjitsu: Daryl
Minister Of Throwing Rocks At People Who Vote For Other Parties: Sakura Yume
Minister of Random Urination: Mr. Graves
Minister of Punching Random People: noname
Minister of Neutering Dumbass Trolls: La Femme Merekia
Minister of Genocide: Wyllius

General Membership
bandgeek
gokufusionss1

Those who want to join, post in this thread; If you want to run in a specific forum, list it. Also, anybody with suggestions for cabinet departments, go ahead and list some--I have to throw this thread together quickly, because I have a job, unlike the left-leaning leeches of the other parties.

Forum Representation
General Chat, Eyes on Each Other, and World Events
Mr. Graves

The Lounge, General Gaming, and Arts and Writing
Wyllius

Site Staff, Help, and Feedback
Raistlin

Final Fantasy 1-4, Final Fantasy 5, and Final Fantasy 6
Daryl

Final Fantasy 7, Final Fantasy 8, and Final Fantasy 9
DocFrance

Final Fantasy 10, Final Fantasy 10-2, and Final Fantasy 11
Vacant

Final Fantasy 12, Final Fantasy Tactics, and Final Fantasy Tactics Advance
Vacant

Genral Final Fantasy, Video Game Music/TSW, and General Archive
Vacant

Chrono Trigger and Cross, Kingdom Hearts, and General Square Enix
Vacant

Current banner:
http://bleys.vespernet.org/conservative1.gif

I was so sure that you'd join mine party. :cry:

I've been planning this for months.

Oh, ic ic. :o

...too bad that is sucks. 8-)

If they weren't using my tax dollars to buy their food, they probably couldn't even afford to get online to make their parties. Slackers.

I want to hear more about your platform. Compassionate Conservatives, Right-wing, small government, big private sector? Questions...

Bloody well right we're right-wing. Deep pockets, big heads, small tolerance for fools.

So far it seems you're relying on nothing more than your own popularity and having a 'cabinet name' next to your members' names. Oh, and calling other parties 'dumb'. Tsk tsk. You seem like the kind of people who would show huge discrimination towards other members, particularly those who have English as a second language, by using your better-than-you attitude.

I think this could be rather appropriate:

http://www.zompist.com/predic.htm

Question, is it possible to join one party and lead another at the same time?

The reason that I have a "better-than-you" attitude is because I am better than you, and the reason I call other parties dumb is because they legitimately are dumb. I'm a Tory--I call a spade a spade, and sod all that polictically correct nonsense. If I want to say something, I say it, I don't spew out an 8,000 word essay in order to say "Chocolate cake is yummy." If I want to say "Chocolate is yummy," guess what I say?

And I've got no problem with people who have English as a second language--They speak better english than half the native anglophones on the internet!

So if a couple of newbies came along into this thread, and politely asked if they could join "can i join ur party??", would you let him? Or would you tell them that you're better than they are, and that they couldn't join?

And then there's people who are actually *english* and in turn seem to be the worst speakers and writers in the world. Txt spek cm frm her.

I'd wish you luck, but I daresay your Tory would throw it back in my face.

Bleys, you might want to figure out the source of your slogan and signature. Correct source, rather. If you can't figure that out, what legitimacy does this party have?

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Loony BoB
So if a couple of newbies came along into this thread, and politely asked if they could join "can i join ur party??", would you let him? Or would you tell them that you're better than they are, and that they couldn't join?

---

Presumably they would be re-educated.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Loony BoB
So if a couple of newbies came along into this thread, and politely asked if they could join "can i join ur party??", would you let him? Or would you tell them that you're better than they are, and that they couldn't join?

---

BoB, if a couple of newbies came and said "Can I join your" party, I would welcome them. If, however, they said "ur," I would send them back to mandatory schooling. Or else prison.

Oh, and coming back to what you said earlier about me relying on my "popularity": Check your facts. The left wing are the ones who spend money that doesn't exist. My "popularity" ran out years ago. I deal with facts, not fairy tales.

The problem with conservatives is that their reactionary - always thinking after it already happened. :|


EDIT:

Whoo-hoo! My first they're/their mix-up. This means that I'm actually pretty fluent in the damn language now. :D You gotta have the ear for a mistake like that.


But "conservatist" is unforgivable. DELETED!

So not only does this platform proclaim the party's intelligence on inherent merit, thus begging the question, but also implies that those on the left wing are by default uneducated and - even more notably - inarticulate. And though the former is just another example of unsupported claims, the latter is reckless and unfounded slander. i'm a decently left wing person, and in the least, i do know how to type. :D

This party's views be of seriously questionable merit. :o

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Blanco Meow
i do know how to type. :D

---

Capital I.

I think it's safe to say that I've spent more time educating people with poor grammar how to speak proper English than any of the leading members of this party.

<Doomgaze> I make no claims to be in the typing Gestapo.

Hmm. A true politician indeed. This party is foolish to think that they are better than any other party. Prejudiced politicians who act more like New Labour ministers than those of the Tory party.

EDIT: Citizen Bleys, if you honestly believe that you do not have three popular members of Eyes on Final Fantasy founding this party, then I may rest my case that the leader of this party needs a more intelligent member in charge. To suggest such things is a joke.

I see no left-wing parties within EoFF spending any money. You are unable to back this claim.

Bobbitize PG? What does bobbit even mean? Join my party, where I actually use english instead of words with no meaning

One generally conjugates the infinitive "to be."

"but also implies that those on the left wing are by default uneducated and - even more notably - inarticulate."

We call them as we see them.

BoB. I merely meant that grammar is my area of specialty, and not spelling your god-forsaken name. Going along with your intentional slaughtering of the rules of English pains me sometimes, you see.

The real question that none of these slackers seemed to have asked so far is:

Are you going to be as right-wing as New Labour because they have so kicked your arse over the last 4 years in that respect.

Also if you get rid of top-up fees I'll consider voting for you but probably won't as 98% of all Tories are liers anyway.

This sounds a bit like that shady bunch from World War II.

What were they called again?

English has a few rules for which i have little respect, and the capitalized singular self-reflexive pronoun is one of them. i quit capitalizing it long ago, and i think i can otherwise display enough grammatical/syntactical ability to prove it an intentional decision rather than ignorance. Civil Disobedience! <3

EDIT:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Doomgaze
One generally conjugates the infinitive "to be."

---

True, but that doesn't make it incorrect; it's merely a bit dated.

May i remind you all that you're engaging in ad hominem attacks - breaking down someone's character rather than their argument - which accomplishes little. Even the world's greatest fool can make a killer point.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Rainecloud
This sounds a bit like that shady bunch from World War II.

What were they called again?

---

i think it was "not-zee's" or something like that

I would just like to note that my name has in fact not been forsaken by God, nor by a god.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Loony BoB
EDIT: Citizen Bleys, if you honestly believe that you do not have three popular members of Eyes on Final Fantasy founding this party, then I may rest my case that the leader of this party needs a more intelligent member in charge. To suggest such things is a joke.

---

Formerly popular. Which is why we have all of these fools jumping at the opportunity to try to bring us down a peg right now.

This thread is fun. i'd join the party out of amusement, but i don't know if any party would appreciate internal dissonance enough to admit folks of opposing ideologies. :D

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Citizen Bleys
Formerly popular. Which is why we have all of these fools jumping at the opportunity to try to bring us down a peg right now.

---

Incorrect. Your party is just the first to offer something that's truely worth debating. Your policies are worse than any other policies I've seen in any other party thread. Clearly, you are the more vulnerable party.

I'd also like to add that I have a great job. I, for one, do not work at Wendy's.

Capital I is an... Dictionary com, you're my friend, come to me and help again anomaly. Either we should all be saying capital U and I and maybe even W and DH, or non-capital ai. *_*

Of course, Blanco Meow, you're making the mistake of not capitalising the i:s that begin a sentence, even though you use that feature of the language. >:D

Hmm. That's true...

i guess i can only chalk it up to style: trying to keep an oppositional universality in its constant lack of capitalization the same way the actual rule is for it always to be capitalized.

...But that's all i've got. :D

If this is anything like the grammer gestopo, I'll join.

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Blanco Meow
Hmm. That's true...

i guess i can only chalk it up to style: trying to keep an oppositional universality in its constant lack of capitalization the same way the actual rule is for it always to be capitalized.

...But that's all i've got. :D

---

You extremists are all the same. DON'T YOU SEE, YOU'RE THE SAME AS THEM.

<Strider|GoFavre> Do you think you could fix the typo in my party's title?
<Loony_BoB> Sure.
<Doomgaze> Yeah, it says "4"
<Doomgaze> where it should say "for."
<Strider|GoFavre> No, the second Favre is misspelled. Inadvertantly.
<Strider|GoFavre> The 4 is part of the slogan, man.
<Strider|GoFavre> It should be spelled "Favre"
<Loony_BoB> Doomy, you are incorrect either way. It should say "for", not "for."
<Doomgaze> I was ending the sentence, you fool.
<Doomgaze> Oh, I see.
<Doomgaze> Daniel, there is some... disagreement between the US and Britain on that matter.
<Loony_BoB> Hmm?
<Doomgaze> Americans write "this is correct."
<Doomgaze> Brits write "this is correct".
<Loony_BoB> Doomy, you should have at least used single quotation marks rather than double. So long as you are quoting what should have been replacing the '4', you should not have included the period.
<Doomgaze> No, the period ends the sentence. Because the quotation ends the sentence, it goes there.
<Loony_BoB> You do see the problem, though, Doomy?
<Doomgaze> I see why threre is confusion, but... no, it is still correct.
<Loony_BoB> It is not.
<Nait> Ok, what're you two love-doves arguing about?
<Doomgaze> It was perhaps not the best way of putting it, given the international audience.
<Nait> Quotes and periods?
<Loony_BoB> Indeed.
<Nait> In english, periods go inside quotes.
<Nait> If it's a part of a quote.
<Loony_BoB> However, no matter how you put it, you still used the period inside the quote.
<Strider|GoFavre> Doom wasn't quoting, though, was he?
<Loony_BoB> Nait, here's our problem...
<Nait> Show me.
* Nait is now known as Nait_Solomon
<Loony_BoB> Yeah, it says "4"
<Loony_BoB> where it should say "for."
<Nait_Solomon> ARGH
<Nait_Solomon> PERIOD OUTSIDE
<Nait_Solomon> OUTSIDE!
<Loony_BoB> :D!
<Strider|GoFavre> Nait's Finnish, and he knows more about English than you do, Doom.
<Doomgaze> It's correct in the US.
<Loony_BoB> I do believe you are incorrect.
<Loony_BoB> Should what Doomy said be correct, then the thread title would be as follows: The Brett Favre Party: Favre for. Change
<Doomgaze> No.
<Loony_BoB> The current thread title: The Brett Favre Party: Favre 4 Change
<Doomgaze> In the US, you put the period inside of the quotes when you end the sentence.
<Doomgaze> You're still wrong.
<Loony_BoB> I am not.
<Loony_BoB> What you said suggest that a period should be placed within a sentence.
<Doomgaze> Maybe if you are European.
<Doomgaze> I am not, so therefore my statement was correct.
* David has joined #eoff
<Loony_BoB> And according to your statement, the thread title should read The Brett Favre Party: Favre for. Change
<David> Yay. Arguing.
<Doomgaze> It's an American vs. British thing.
<David> Hmm.
<Loony_BoB> "Whenever we have to use a question mark or an exclamation point with a sentence that ends in a quotation, we follow the dictates of logic in determining where the question mark or exclamation point goes. If it is part of the quotation itself, we put it inside the quotation marks, and if it governs the sentence as a whole but not the material being quoted, we put it outside the quotation marks."
<David> How is for being used?
<Loony_BoB> David.
<David> "for". is correct in almost all senses.
<Loony_BoB> The existing thread title is: The Brett Favre Party: Favre 4 Change
<David> Unless for comes at the end of a sentence in a quote.
<Loony_BoB> Doomy stated:
<Loony_BoB> Yeah, it says "4"
<Loony_BoB> where it should say "for."
<David> It should be "where it should say 'for'."
<Loony_BoB> :D
<Loony_BoB> Thankyou, David.
<Loony_BoB> Now, the question remains...
<Nait_Solomon> Doom gets the vowels, Loony the consonants!
<Loony_BoB> Do we use this for public humiliation within the Conservative Party thread?
<Nait_Solomon> Yes.

Now, with backing by Finnish, English and Americans - I just proved my grammar is above the level of the grammar gestapo.

I don't claim to have the best grammar. It has flaws... but this so called grammar gestapo is educating people incorrectly. This party is a disgrace to itself.

I am really, really tempted to join this party. I agree with most of the ideals stated.

But I've been a loyal Goatsecs woman for three years now and really had hoped to see that party rise again... hm.

*holds off making a decision for now*

I like your castration of Pureghetto policy, but I'm against your killing people policy.

You can put me down on the member list if you like. xD I agree with the all other parties suck business.