Do Recognized Members still have the power to close their own threads? And if they do, why doesn't Former Staff? :aimmad:
Printable View
Do Recognized Members still have the power to close their own threads? And if they do, why doesn't Former Staff? :aimmad:
That's what you get for leaving staff.
I agree though.
Well Bleys, Nights, Fish and Batman can't can't close their own thread, so I don't see why Former Staff should either. :p
Actually I agree that Former Staff should be able to close their own threads. oh what a glorious day it will be when Gau can close this thread.
It will be! Cause, y'know.. I start so many threadsQuote:
Originally posted by Flying Mullet
Actually I agree that Former Staff should be able to close their own threads. oh what a glorious day it will be when Gau can close this thread.
I dunno, you guys should get something more practical, like keep your unlimited PM's. So you don't have to delete any after stepping down. That really bugged me while I was 'on leave'. I just turned PM's off.
Too late for that, I deleted 200 or so pms when I stepped down.Quote:
Originally posted by Loony BoB
I dunno, you guys should get something more practical, like keep your unlimited PM's. So you don't have to delete any after stepping down. That really bugged me while I was 'on leave'. I just turned PM's off.
I don't get any special privledges, so yea.
FS should get all the privileges and prestige of RMs. And so, so much more.
This request seems logical.
I mentioned that when we were making the FS user group and someone said no. Probably you, Mattface. :aimmad:
If you want to implement a hack like that, you know who to ask to write it. 8-)Quote:
Originally posted by Loony BoB
I dunno, you guys should get something more practical, like keep your unlimited PM's. So you don't have to delete any after stepping down.
Bleys.
Is that Bleys the person or Bleys the group? :-D
Bleys as in "anyone but The Man."
Me?? I don't think so...Quote:
Originally posted by ShlupQuack
I mentioned that when we were making the FS user group and someone said no. Probably you, Mattface. :aimmad:
Die, :skull::skull::skull::skull:er.Quote:
Originally posted by Yamaneko
Bleys.
Die, :skull::skull::skull::skull:er.Quote:
Originally posted by Raistlin
Bleys as in "anyone but The Man."
I'm not writing any more hacks, so you'd best go with Aaron.
Ok, I'm sick of this. It's alway Bleys this, Aaron that. When is someone going to ask ME to write a hack? Huh? Huh? I mean, c'mon.
If anyone asks you now, you'll know it's out of pity. Do you really want that?
... Yes.
I've been waiting for so long, it doesn't matter anymore. I am pitiful, pity me, have mercy.
Hey Nait, I was wondering if you could write a hack for my Livejournal that would allow me to update via the webcam in my bathroom.
*removes "moyda1" from friends list*
*removes everyone but moyda1 from friends list*
I didn't even know you had a LJ, Shoe
sshhhhhhh
it's a secret
they could be watching.
they most definitely are.
I'm not they.
BUT I AM WATCHING. HAHA!
Quote:
Originally posted by Gau
Hey Nait, I was wondering if you could write a hack for my Livejournal that would allow me to update via the webcam in my bathroom.
I'm sorry, but I must refuse on moral grounds.
Bah.:mad:
*awards Nait with a commendation for heroism*
We should allow everybody supermod ability. That would even out the spectrum and make the world better.
I'd start banning people so fast they'd think they were in a time warp
Would it be one of those cool time warps involving sequined costumes and dancing?Quote:
Originally posted by Citizen Bleys
I'd start banning people so fast they'd think they were in a time warp
If everyone was supermod, there'd be no-one capable of being banned by supermods :p
If I were a super-mod everyone would have one radmon word in their post replaced with "potato". *nods*
You and your damned logic. I'm getting sick of it!Quote:
Originally posted by Guu
If everyone was supermod, there'd be no-one capable of being banned by supermods :p
Yeah, you're interfering with the way Bleys thinks, y'know. While that thinking may be illogical, nonsensical, and just general gibberish, you have no right to restrict him!
Wise words, from the Master of Reasoning who once said "This is either an accidental fire, or one done on purpose"
Well either way he can't be wrong there. Besides, who wants to be wrong?Quote:
Originally posted by Citizen Bleys
Wise words, from the Master of Reasoning who once said "This is either an accidental fire, or one done on purpose"
That was either something wise, or else it was something stupid.
We're getting really good here, or we're getting bad.
How about we add "Former Recognized Member" title or something. :D And they wouldn't be able to do anything they were formerly able to do.
It's there, you just can't see it.
I see it.:)
I second that motion. And while you're at it, how about a "Not Yet Recognised Member" title? :p
I think there should be an "Awesome Member" title and they should be able to be cool. And stuff.
i like to eat toe jam