I did a google search and this came up.
http://www.gop.com/kerryvskerry/backup.asp
Discuss.
He even voted for the patriot act, and now is against it. :\ And alota other things...
Printable View
I did a google search and this came up.
http://www.gop.com/kerryvskerry/backup.asp
Discuss.
He even voted for the patriot act, and now is against it. :\ And alota other things...
So, when a person changes their mind about an issue, due to new developments and facts, that doesnt make them an intellegent person, instead it makes them a flip-flopper?
I'd much rather have someone who can admit to wrongs and change for a better future that someone that blindly stays on target no matter how wrong he's proven.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheAbominatrix
Yes, Kerry is amorphic, indecisive, and doesn't really do a lot. He sort of... flows, doing whatever's convenient. Bush, on the other hand, does whatever he thinks is right, and goes with it 'till the end, even it it's ultimately dumb.
I'd like to see someone who actually uses common sense, yet has enough conviction to actually follow his ideals and ideas. Kerry has the former, and Bush has the latter. None of them have both.
chaos: As said by the Abominatrix, and Skogs, at least when Kerry does change his mind, he doesn't end up doing something stupid. True it's good to stay on your words, but not if it will end up screwing everything up.
Albedo: *Laughs maniacally* And how come only Kerry is noticed as the Flip-Flopper? I'm sure Bush has pretty much done the same thing he has done, if it is bad at all, anyway.
Bush is usually staunchly consistant, even when outright caught in a lie. The only thing I've noticed him flip-flopping in is the reasons for invading Iraq. First it was because Saddam had ties to Bin Laden (a lie), then because Iraq had WMDs (also a lie), and then because we needed to liberate the Iraqi people. That seems like flip-flopping to me, not just changing one's mind because of new facts. In fact it seems like a desperate bunch of changes in order to justify attacking Iraq.
I've noticed that President Bush's campaign spends a lot of time trying to discredit Kerry. However, their idea of "discrediting" him is simply to say, "Flip-flopper! Flip-flopper! Flip-flopper!" over and over, like a school child trying to taunt a five-year-old girl.
Fortunately, this simply eliminates any effect or power those words might have, turning it into something laughable.[q=noname]He even voted for the patriot act, and now is against it. :\ And alota other things...[/q]How many re-drafts did that Act get before it was passed? How many crucial provisions were altered, making them more severe?
That is the kind of detail that actually matters, and that's exactly the kind of detail that Bush's PR team purposefully ignores.
It's entirely possible that the Patriot Act, when introduced, was not as draconian as some claim it is now. Kerry might only have begun to oppose it after it was altered into something he disagreed with.
However, Bush's crew would never mention such a fact - if it were true - because that's take away their chance to chant "Flip-flopper! Flip-flopper! Flip-flopper!" one more time.
Kerry's not the only flip-flopper, as President Bush was also guilty of doing so too.
Quote:
source
George Bush Flip Flops on the Issues
From the beginning, George W. Bush has made his own credibility a central issue. On 10/11/00, then Governor Bush said: "I think credibility is important. It is going to be important for the president to be credible with Congress, important for the president to be credible with foreign nations."
Compare those words with his actions...
1. OPEC
BUSH PROMISES TO FORCE OPEC TO LOWER PRICES..."What I think the president ought to do [when gas prices spike] is he ought to get on the phone with the OPEC cartel and say we expect you to open your spigots...And the president of the United States must jawbone OPEC members to lower the price." [President Bush, 1/26/00]
...BUSH REFUSES TO LOBBY OPEC LEADERS With gas prices soaring in the United States at the beginning of 2004, the Miami Herald reported the president refused to "personally lobby oil cartel leaders to change their minds." [Miami Herald, 4/1/04]
2. Iraq Funding
BUSH SPOKESMAN DENIES NEED FOR ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR THE REST OF 2004..."We do not anticipate requesting supplemental funding for '04." [White House Budget Director Joshua Bolton, 2/2/04]
...BUSH REQUESTS ADDITIONAL FUNDS FOR IRAQ FOR 2004 "I am requesting that Congress establish a $25 billion contingency reserve fund for the coming fiscal year to meet all commitments to our troops." [President Bush, Statement by President, 5/5/04]
3. Condoleeza Rice Testimony
BUSH SPOKESMAN SAYS RICE WON'T TESTIFY AS 'A MATTER OF PRINCIPLE'..."Again, this is not her personal preference; this goes back to a matter of principle. There is a separation of powers issue involved here. Historically, White House staffers do not testify before legislative bodies. So it's a matter of principle, not a matter of preference." [White House Press Secretary Scott Mcclellan, 3/9/04]
...BUSH ORDERS RICE TO TESTIFY: "Today I have informed the Commission on Terrorist Attacks Against the United States that my National Security Advisor, Dr. Condoleezza Rice, will provide public testimony." [President Bush, 3/30/04]
4. Science
BUSH PLEDGES TO ISSUE REGULATIONS BASED ON SCIENCE..."I think we ought to have high standards set by agencies that rely upon science, not by what may feel good or what sounds good." [then-Governor George W. Bush, 1/15/00]
...BUSH ADMINISTRATION REGULATIONS IGNORE SCIENCE "60 leading scientists‹including Nobel laureates, leading medical experts, former federal agency directors and university chairs and presidents‹issued a statement calling for regulatory and legislative action to restore scientific integrity to federal policymaking. According to the scientists, the Bush administration has, among other abuses, suppressed and distorted scientific analysis from federal agencies, and taken actions that have undermined the quality of scientific advisory panels." [Union of Concerned Scientists, 2/18/04]
5. Ahmed Chalabi
BUSH INVITES CHALABI TO STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS...President Bush also met with Chalabi during his brief trip to Iraq last Thanksgiving [White House Documents 1/20/04, 11/27/03]
...BUSH MILITARY ASSISTS IN RAID OF CHALABI'S HOUSE"U.S. soldiers raided the home of America's one-time ally Ahmad Chalabi on Thursday and seized documents and computers." [Washington Post, 5/20/04]
6. Department of Homeland Security
BUSH OPPOSES THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY..."So, creating a Cabinet office doesn't solve the problem. You still will have agencies within the federal government that have to be coordinated. So the answer is that creating a Cabinet post doesn't solve anything." [White House spokesman Ari Fleischer, 3/19/02]
...BUSH SUPPORTS THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY "So tonight, I ask the Congress to join me in creating a single, permanent department with an overriding and urgent mission: securing the homeland of America and protecting the American people." [President Bush, Address to the Nation, 6/6/02]
7. Weapons of Mass Destruction
BUSH SAYS WE FOUND THE WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION..."We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratoriesŠfor those who say we haven't found the banned manufacturing devices or banned weapons, they're wrong, we found them." [President Bush, Interview in Poland, 5/29/03]
...BUSH SAYS WE HAVEN'T FOUND WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION "David Kay has found the capacity to produce weapons. And when David Kay goes in and says we haven't found stockpiles yet, and there's theories as to where the weapons went. They could have been destroyed during the war. Saddam and his henchmen could have destroyed them as we entered into Iraq. They could be hidden. They could have been transported to another country, and we'll find out." [President Bush, Meet the Press, 2/7/04]
8. Free Trade
BUSH SUPPORTS FREE TRADE... "I believe strongly that if we promote trade, and when we promote trade, it will help workers on both sides of this issue." [President Bush in Peru, 3/23/02]
...BUSH SUPPORTS RESTRICTIONS ON TRADE "In a decision largely driven by his political advisers, President Bush set aside his free-trade principles last year and imposed heavy tariffs on imported steel to help out struggling mills in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, two states crucial for his reelection." [Washington Post, 9/19/03]
9. Osama Bin Laden
BUSH WANTS OSAMA DEAD OR ALIVE... "I want justice. And there's an old poster out West, I recall, that says, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive.'" [President Bush, on Osama Bin Laden, 09/17/01]
...BUSH DOESN'T CARE ABOUT OSAMA ³I don't know where he is. You know, I just don't spend that much time on himŠ I truly am not that concerned about him.² [President Bush, Press Conference, 3/13/02]
10. The Environment
BUSH SUPPORTS MANDATORY CAPS ON CARBON DIOXIDE... "[If elected], Governor Bush will work toŠestablish mandatory reduction targets for emissions of four main pollutants: sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxide, mercury and carbon dioxide." [Bush Environmental Plan, 9/29/00]
...BUSH OPPOSES MANDATORY CAPS ON CARBON DIOXIDE "I do not believe, however, that the government should impose on power plants mandatory emissions reductions for carbon dioxide, which is not a 'pollutant' under the Clean Air Act." [President Bush, Letter to Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-NE), 3/13/03]
11. WMD Commission
BUSH RESISTS AN OUTSIDE INVESTIGATION ON WMD INTELLIGENCE FAILURE... "The White House immediately turned aside the calls from Kay and many Democrats for an immediate outside investigation, seeking to head off any new wide-ranging election-year inquiry that might go beyond reports already being assembled by congressional committees and the Central Intelligence Agency." [NY Times, 1/29/04]
...BUSH SUPPORTS AN OUTSIDE INVESTIGATION ON WMD INTELLIGENCE FAILURE "Today, by executive order, I am creating an independent commission, chaired by Governor and former Senator Chuck Robb, Judge Laurence Silberman, to look at American intelligence capabilities, especially our intelligence about weapons of mass destruction." [President Bush, 2/6/04]
12. Creation of the 9/11 Commission
BUSH OPPOSES CREATION OF INDEPENDENT 9/11 COMMISSION... "President Bush took a few minutes during his trip to Europe Thursday to voice his opposition to establishing a special commission to probe how the government dealt with terror warnings before Sept. 11." [CBS News, 5/23/02]
...BUSH SUPPORTS CREATION OF INDEPENDENT 9/11 COMMISSION "President Bush said today he now supports establishing an independent commission to investigate the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks." [ABC News, 09/20/02]
13. Time Extension for 9/11 Commission
BUSH OPPOSES TIME EXTENSION FOR 9/11 COMMISSION... "President Bush and House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert (R-Ill.) Have decided to oppose granting more time to an independent commission investigating the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks." [Washington Post, 1/19/04]
...BUSH SUPPORTS TIME EXTENSION FOR 9/11 COMMISSION "The White House announced Wednesday its support for a request from the commission investigating the September 11, 2001 attacks for more time to complete its work." [CNN, 2/4/04]
14. Gay Marriage
BUSH SAYS GAY MARRIAGE IS A STATE ISSUE... "The state can do what they want to do. Don't try to trap me in this state's issue like you're trying to get me into." [Gov. George W. Bush on Gay Marriage, Larry King Live, 2/15/00]
...BUSH SUPPORTS CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT BANNING GAY MARRIAGE "Today I call upon the Congress to promptly pass, and to send to the states for ratification, an amendment to our Constitution defining and protecting marriage as a union of man and woman as husband and wife." [President Bush, 2/24/04]
15. Nation Building
BUSH OPPOSES NATION BUILDING... "If we don't stop extending our troops all around the world in nation-building missions, then we're going to have a serious problem coming down the road." [Gov. George W. Bush, 10/3/00]
...BUSH SUPPORTS NATION BUILDING "We will be changing the regime of Iraq, for the good of the Iraqi people." [President Bush, 3/6/03]
16. Saddam/al Qaeda Link
BUSH SAYS IT IS IMPOSSIBLE TO DISTINGUISH BETWEEEN AL QAEDA AND SADDAM... "You can't distinguish between al Qaeda and Saddam when you talk about the war on terror." [President Bush, 9/25/02]
...BUSH SAYS SADDAM HAD NO ROLE IN AL QAEDA PLOT "We've had no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved in Sept. 11." [President Bush, 9/17/03]
17. U.N. Resolution
BUSH VOWS TO HAVE A UN VOTE NO MATTER WHAT... "No matter what the whip count is, we're calling for the vote. We want to see people stand up and say what their opinion is about Saddam Hussein and the utility of the United Nations Security Council. And so, you bet. It's time for people to show their cards, to let the world know where they stand when it comes to Saddam." [President Bush 3/6/03]
...BUSH WITHDRAWS REQUEST FOR VOTE "At a National Security Council meeting convened at the White House at 8:55 a.m., Bush finalized the decision to withdraw the resolution from consideration and prepared to deliver an address to the nation that had already been written." [Washington Post, 3/18/03]
18. Campaign Finance
BUSH OPPOSES MCCAIN-FEINGOLD... "George W. Bush opposes McCain-Feingold...as an infringement on free expression." [Washington Post, 3/28/2000]
...BUSH SIGNS MCCAIN-FEINGOLD INTO LAW "[T]his bill improves the current system of financing for Federal campaigns, and therefore I have signed it into law." [President Bush, at the mccain-Feingold signing ceremony, 03/27/02]
chaos: Exactly what I meant. Although, the things I really minded were the constant change of reason of invading Iraq, like TheAbominatrix said.
Rubedo: And Bush staying constant on most of his reasons hasn't helped us out much either...
Wow, I was wrong about the Bush thing, I didnt know all that stuff. My opinion has changed. (Yes, I'm being serious)
Look at me flip-flopping! xD
This whole flip flopping thing is not only becoming absurd, it's becoming warped and unintelligent.
Oh I thought you were gonna bash him for the shoes he wears...
I agree with Abominashely.
Quote:
Originally Posted by devilmaykickass
xD We need a President who wears flip flops! Hunter Thompson for pres!
chaos: Trowa for President!
Trowa: *Sits and stares and sits and stares and sits and stares*
Rubedo: If it does any good, we'll make him wear flip-flops :D
Just about every politician alive "flip-flops" a great deal. If that is the best the Bush administration comes up with it shows how pathetic they truly are.
:p :DQuote:
Big D, on Bush's campaign against Kerry
"like a school child trying to taunt a five-year-old girl. "
http://www.comedycentral.com/tv_show...x=25&p=stewart
click on the video labeled "Bush vs Bush" (top-right corner)
Despite the republicans best efforts to brainwash america into thinking Kerry is a "flip-flopper" the truth remains that nearly every politician "flip-flops" on issues. Only some candidates have more productive things to talk about rather than making petty accusations that practically everyone's guilty of. Kthx.
I like how, in my history class (full of rabid Bush supporters, who support him for no real reason other than he is currently President and that John Kerry is ugly), there was a kid (a senior, by the way, who is in a 10th grade European history class) who said that in the course of Kerry's campaign, the democratic convention has tried to do nothing but make jokes at the Republicans, where Bush and the Republicans take everything very seriously and make sure that all the facts are presented properly.
I live in Texas, obviously a Republican stronghold, and more than the whole concept of "flip-flopping" which I understand that every politican does, I've never really caught on to exactly what Kerry's values and stances even are. Now, fundamentally, I'm a Republican, but that's fundamentally; I am not a supporter of the Republican Party (I hope we can all see the difference).
I'm glad theres actually someone out there whos willing to say that...that in itself proves you don't support the republican party. :pQuote:
Originally Posted by Kirobaito
I am also a fellow Republican, but I don't plan on voting for Bush. =P
I like your attitude.
I think Kerry made a pretty good argument against his so called Flip Flopping in the first debate. It's better to have a president who can realize when he's made an error in judgement, rather than one who will commit himself something to the very end. I live in an extremely conservative state, and hear an incredible amount of un-backed statements about Kerry, such as "He's a pansy" or "He's a flip flopper." I don't see how he could be a pansy, what with the going to war thing...and some people make the excuse that he looks like a horse. And I say...so what? :jap:
I'd simply like to point out that as Final Fantasy fans, we've never flip flopped, have we? I mean, especially after we beat *current favorite FF game* Note to all: Everyone flip flops. A better word for it is "fickle".
What makes this different from any other politician anywhere in Washington D.C., or across the country for that matter? It doesn't matter if it's Joe Shmoe from Anyville County, Wyoming; Jane Shmoe from Whatsit City, Arkansas; or good ol' John Kerry from Massachusetts. Chances are, every single politician has flipped their stance on a given issue at least once? Why?
Because of us, basically.
EDIT: And by "us", I mean a politician's constituency as a whole. So we can avoid all of that nasty "they don't listen to young people" stuff.
I hate Kerry and Bush both, but to the whole world, nobody is more of a "flip-flopper" and hypocrite than George W. Bush.
"Flip-Flop" is the name of a games section on a game show called "The Price Is Right", in Australia.
Aussieland has The Price is Right? I didn't know that. We've had it in the US...for a real loooooong time now.Quote:
Originally Posted by Omecle
But umm what does that have to do with the price of rice in China?
Really? Amazing, because I know of similar "game" that also has "flip floping" integrated into it this year. It's called the "American Presidential Elections" I don't know if you've heard of it, but it's riot. Not very popular here in the U.S. though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Omecle
exdeeQuote:
Originally Posted by nik0tine
This is a totally illogical statement. The best rebuttal of this piss-poor assertion is that George Bush changed his stance on Homeland Security. He was against it just because a democrat proposed it, but then he supported it when he realised both republicans and democrats alike were supporting it. Pathetic.
So what's better, a guy who changes his mind and admits that he was
wrong in the past or a guy who will not change his opinion no matter how
much is stacked against him?
.opt
Yeah, like being steadfast, unwavering, staying the course while driving this country into a wallQuote:
Originally Posted by War Angel
The list of Bush major policy U-turns is as audacious as it is long. Among the whiplash-inducing lowlights:
In September 2001, Bush said capturing bin Laden was “our number one priority.” By March 2002, he was claiming, “I don’t know where he is. I have no idea and I really don’t care. It’s not that important.”
In October 2001, he was dead-set against the need for a Department of Homeland Security. Seven months later, he thought it was a great idea.
In May 2002, he opposed the creation of the 9/11 Commission. Four months later, he supported it.
During the 2000 campaign, he said that gay marriage was a states’ rights issue: “The states can do what they want to do.” During the 2004 campaign, he called for a constitutional ban on gay marriage.
Dizzy yet? No? OK:
Bush supported CO2 caps, then opposed them. He opposed trade tariffs, then he didn’t. Then he did again. He was against nation building, then he was OK with it. We’d found WMD, then we hadn’t. Saddam was linked to Osama, then he wasn’t. Then he was … sorta. Chalabi was in, then he was out. Way out.
In fact, Bush’s entire Iraq misadventure has been one big costly, deadly flip-flop:
We didn’t need more troops, then we did. We didn’t need more money, then we did. Preemption was a great idea — on to Syria, Iran and North Korea! Then it wasn’t — hello, diplomacy! Baathists were the bad guys, then Baathists were our buds. We didn’t need the U.N., then we did.
And all this from a man who, once upon a time, made “credibility” a key to his appeal.
http://www.ariannaonline.com/columns/column.php?id=722