I think so.
Printable View
I think so.
Why not? I mean, someone like Grace Jones could take on any man. :D
Women already can fight in wars.
>.< I meant, what do you think about it, do you think its a good idea to let them.
Why not? It's their choice what they want to do with their lives. I know a few girls who are gung ho about joining the military. They're just as excited to serve their country like guys can.
:D
If they have the ability, and if they want to, I suppose. :-/
yeah, whos stopping em.
I dont really care who goes
Except for Gary Coleman
Yeah, Women should fight in war.
Its not as if they are forced to join the Army, if they didn't want to be involved in war surely they wouldn't sign up.
Imagining the wartime atrocities that could be committed against female Prisoners of War I don't know if it's such a good idea. However, I don't think it's such a good idea for guys to go to war either.
LIPSTICK BOMBS!
Nobody should be allowed to fight in a war.
I don't want to.
Then soldiers can harp on about "Women tank drivers!" when a woman just massacres an entire regiment of her own men and crashes into a lamp post.
They want equal rights.. conscript there butts in the amry!!!! roar!!!
If they want to, go for it.
Look of Joan of Arc (Ignoring the fact she was lattered burned at the stake, didn't she have a pretty sucessful military career?)
*Insert vaguely sexist joke about driving or kitchens here*
I don't like the idea of women dying in general, but they have as much right to be in a war as men.
Of course they could be better than men!
Why has this thread been taken so seriously?
'Nuff said.Quote:
Originally Posted by nik0tine
In the future all wars will be fought on Internet forums where everyone is a hot 19 yr. old asian chick.
well in the future wars will be fought using FPS games and elite gamers will answer the call to duty and will telll there grandsons a day to remember when they died and spawned back so many times .Quote:
Originally Posted by Yamaneko
Women can already fight in the front lines. HOWEVER nobody wants to, and those who do, most of them quit because of the most ludicrous of reasons. Typically women in war exist outside of the front lines.
There's also whether they can pass the requirements :D
the only problem women on the front lines of battle would have is there periods.
KILL BILL! That's all I'm saying. ^_^;; Women with Katana's are unbeatable!
lol I think they're problem will be periods and breaking a nail.
Not if we send 11 year olds in!
Conscripting children is illegal lol.
*gets gun*
No one should go to war.
Who's going to defend you when the King of England walks into your house?
No one... England has a queen.
God save the Queen then.
There should be no wars...Wait I am being naive. Sorry about that, but still I wish there were no wars.
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...ostbusters.pngQuote:
Originally Posted by Yamaneko
I want to be burned at the stake, ever since I was like 7, really shoot me up with morphine and let me enjoy the tickling!
Sorry, this is the real world, not harry potter.Quote:
Originally Posted by bbomber72000
WTF???
Should they be allowed to? Sure, it's their right too. Should they? Hell no. Would it be good if they did? No, it'd probably be worse.
And actually, they aren't allowed to now. They can be in combat zones, but they can't technically be in a combat MOS--a job specifically trained, and expecting, to face combat. Combat Engineers, Infantry, Artillery...no women. They can, however, be Military Police, which in Iraq are doing many Infantry jobs, or things like Medics, which are attached to Combat Engineers/Infantry/etc.
Now, you show me a woman that can carry as much as a male soldier for as far as a male soldier can carry it, can shoot as well as a male soldier, can obey commands without hesitation and do everything else the male soldiers have to do in "usual" combat situations, and I'll welcome her in. But while the PT standards stay so low for females, no way.