Yet another conspiracy, cept this one is believablish. I need more facts though.
http://www.freedomunderground.org/me...entagon244.swf
Printable View
Yet another conspiracy, cept this one is believablish. I need more facts though.
http://www.freedomunderground.org/me...entagon244.swf
I've seen this. I think there is some truth to it, which I will not get into.
A) I want it presented factually and with sensibility, not with angry goth rock music and big red 'X's.
B) What are the alternative theories. A missile? Where from? Who fired it? How did they get it?
C) What happened to Flight 77?
I've always felt something was a little fishy about it, but that extends largely to supposing they mis-classified the plane, not that there was no plane or something.
Which is why i want more facts. Those facts I will probably never get, but it does bring up some questions.
It's about as off base as any other theory.
http://www.snopes.com/rumors/pentagon.htm
I really need to remember to check Snopes when I hear a rumor out. It alawys slips my mind. >_> Still, thanks for the link.
the thing that made me think was "what happened to the wreckage"
that ammount of fuel, the debris, unscathed ground small hole and what the cameras picked up was too small to be a pane but too big to be a missile.
That's all very well and good, but exactly what is the purpose of this whole exercise? Yes there's a lot to suggest that a Boeing 747 didn't crash into the Pentagon, but what is being insinuated? That the craft was actually a missile? That the damage was done prior to the attack in a staged attempt? That the entire 9/11 attacks were actually done by the government, causing billions of dollars of damage and death to it's citizens for the sake of starting a war against terror which serves no real logical purpose? And more to the point, if this is the case, then wouldn't the toppling of two of the most prominent business structures in the western world be enough to justify such a war? There's no real reason to cause damage to the Twin Towers AND The Pentagon.
So yeah, nice idea and all, but a bit incoherant with it's message.
The purpose is to show there is evidence to prove there was no plane.
...And?Quote:
Originally Posted by Shoden
Since when do conspiracy theories have to have a reason? Hell, just look at JFK's asassination. :rolleyes2
I think I figured it out. The top-secret military scientists were testing out their new hurricane-creation device, but it went haywire and took a chunk out of the Pentagon. And now, after four years of research, they were finally able to unleash it upon the world!
DocFrance, I love you. You consistently make my day! I don't put any stock in conspiracy theories that don't even have a theory other than saying 'ooh! ooh! look! the government might not be right! yay for a great way to waste my spare time!'
the theory goes that the us would commit an act to allow the plan of the pnac to go ahead. it was an attack that gave alot of power to the american government. made an unpopular president popular, gave world support and led the way for the invasion of afghanistan and iraq. would that be worth the lives of a few thousand american people, 4 airliners and 3 buildings? i dunno. i don't believe the theory though.
if this is about the attacks of 9/11 then there is evidence to suggest iyt was american.
A pass port appears out of nowhere, inexperienced people flieing planes.
I don't believe it was American.
I believe there was no plane in the pentagon though.