Originally Posted by raskerino
If you're talking to me what your saying doesn't make sense. To answer your second question, no.
To respond to your first point, that makes no sense. A games ending can redeem it somewhat but if the opening sucks then the opening will still suck. The value of something can be seen better through what comes later, but it was still terrible when you saw it. If you play twenty minutes of a game and say it sucked you don't give it much of a chance but it still was terrible for those twenty minutes. I played 3/4s of the game and it was okay. If the rest of the game is great that doesn't change the fact that earlier was weak. If the game stops me from wanting to play it it's not some alien stopping me it's the game not being good in my eyes. The argument you're using doesn't work- I can judge 3/4 of the game, and it stopped me from playing the rest- making the rest unimportant. Your argument doesn't work, you can argue that I'm not judging the whole game. But saying I can't judge it clearly makes no sense.
Sorry if this is mean but that argument is over used and doesn't work. It says a little but not much, and if you want to defend a game you should defend it with something better then that.
Edit2: Owned.