Printable View
I have one of these in the Staff Forum, figured I may as well make a new one here where you guys can see it. For all you stats freaks like myself.
Here we have members by year born and posts made in the last year (the file called 'longversion' is 2362 pixels wide).
As your a administrator you should know not to post the same topic twice.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loony BoB
Part of the 10 percent that was born in 1990. :D
*hi-fives other 1990s children*
The staff forum one is full of postcounts and stuff that I can't let you people see. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by a nirvana fan
EDIT: Feel free to request stats, too, although I can't promise you'll get the ones you ask for I might be able to come up with some of them.
I want how a pie chart of how many times I've almost been banned :D
I want a pie chart of how many posts crash makes in a ten minute period.
*hi-fives*Quote:
Originally Posted by Shauna
We are so much superior to anyone else :D
Its the two 9's right before the 0. It makes us cool. the 1 is unimportant.
I want one of how many times I have been. :DQuote:
Originally Posted by Bert
No way! the 1990s are not superior to the 1987s. They are superior to everyone else, but not the 87s.
For one thing, you can't use a pie chart for a single statistic such as what you guys (Bert, PiP) have requested. Silly ding dongs. For another thing, no. :p
C'mon, less debate over which year is cooler and more stats requests!
I request stats for which year group is cooler.
Oh come on! Only 5% born in 1984?!
i demand a pie chart to explain my etreme coolness B)
cool stuff BoB, it has backed up my previous conclusion, you are totaly completly insane :D
You want to know stats about coolness? You're all approximately 37/98 degrees (37 or 98 depending on celsius or farenheit), which is considered to be warm/hot. So none of you are cool. Now be more nerdy like me so I can do statsy stuff. Or else I suppose I can just keep all stats to the staff forum (or myself) as usual.
And since I'm not home and don't have my Calvin image for the moment, Charlie Brown will have to do. :(
There is no point. '90's would dominate so much that you couldn't see any of the other ones. We all know this.Quote:
Originally Posted by Anaisa
What about something kinda like #eoff chat stats, where they have the top 50 (or so) posters in a week, how many posts they made, and a random quote? Updated weekly of course. :D
EDIT: For GC.
Sorry, this isn't going to be an ongoing thing, it's just a thread where if something seems interesting enough (and is possible) then I go into the database and, using Excel, come up with whatever stats I'm able to. I won't be doing any updating of stats once they're done, though.
EDIT: Also, what you're wanting would cause a hell of a lot of spamming in the forums, which would be no good.
BoB, you know full well that no post count is an excuse to spam. (well you should)
And, how about post per month thing with a pie chart of which forums are the most active.
A chart comparing my post count to the most frequent posters post count (and all the members in between) in three month increments starting from October 04 until the present.
Well at least we're all hot, so never mind. And BoB, your stats are incorrect, I know you said approximately, but since the temperature here is more like 27/80, I think your just a bit too far out for that stand. I hope such guess work doesn't go into all of your stats.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loony BoB
I said you, not the air around you. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Anaisa
PiP: I should be able to do something for recent times - say the past year? Going back longer than that will cause some forums to lose out as they might not have been around that long (although I'm not sure on this, I don't keep close track of when forums are started).
hero: I'm avoiding blatant individual postcount stuff as these forums don't show postcounts for a reason. =]
BoB, one year would be fine.
sorry if this has already been mentioned but as a pie chart... which years had the most spam posts...
2005, then 2004, then 2003, then 2002, then 2001, then 2000, then 1999.
That was too easy. ;) I don't think I could do a pie chart on that, though, as the posts for the early years are all but gone.
Wow, no spam in 2002, I see.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loony BoB
EDIT: :cool:
EDIT: Oh wait I don't know what I'm talking about. :shifty: This edit was also not made by Daniel Towns. :shifty:
EDIT: don't you try to get out of this one Loony BoB
But that still wouldn't be right, because my temperature is only 30/86.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loony BoB
hmm.. very interesting...Quote:
Originally Posted by Primus Inter Pares
You might want to check your pulse, then. I'm quite sure a human at that temperature would not be alive, although I could be wrong.Quote:
Originally Posted by Anaisa
Seconded.Quote:
Originally Posted by nik0tine
Regarding the crash thing: Not as many as eestlinc. :)
EDIT: Pie and chart - I decided to use a chart for the past year rather than putting all the info onto the pie graph as that way I can put more information in. Only the top forums are in the key because I couldn't be bothered fixing up the legend since the chart tells you the info on the smaller ones better. :D
Some forums were removed in all o' this, such as the Eizon forums. The Project's posts were merged into the Site Staff posts, since all Project threads are just completed Site Staff threads.
FACT: eestlinc made more posts in 2005 than over half of EoFF's forums received in the same time period.
I'm with the 1988 people. I'm the coolest. :)
Nice Staff forum is almost as active as teh X-2 forum. Probably not much better spelling either, and all they're discussing is who is the hottest (lol porn), so, is there really a difference between them?
How about who's warned member thread is teh biggest?
And have you unmerged mine with ToD's yet?
Staff forum doesn't have Old Manus.
I don't think it can be anything peculiar because ive got some of my hospital records, and the lowest temperature ive got is 90, which is obviously not much higher than I am now, so I think if it was unsually low the nurses would have mentioned it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Loony BoB
Yeah, it is unusually low. Most people die if their temperature falls below 95 degrees Fahrenheit.
Too many people have merged threads and/or multiple threads for me to bother figuring that one out. Also, a few of them are longer purely due to the disucssion of states beginning with vowels and whether or not they actually exist and other such important staff matters.Quote:
Originally Posted by Primus Inter Pares
:eek: Id assume it was my thermometer that must be broken but since it says on my hospital records that my temperature was only 92 at one point, it seems a bit unusual that they would both be wrong. But my little sister has just checked her temperature with the same thermometer and hers is 99, is that normal, or is my thermometer broken? But it still says that mine is only 93, so if my thermometer and you are right, then I should be dead!Quote:
Originally Posted by Flying Mullet
The average is 98.6, but I know it fluctuates slightly. For instance, I usually am around 98.0.
I find this deeply offensive to those born before 1965, such as say, those born in 1917.
Can we see the post count? Non-pruned posts too, if possible. xD
No it wouldn't, 87 and 90 would both dominate in equal amounts, and the rest would just be so minute we wouldn't be able to see any of them. My mum, her mum, and my little sister have all taken their temperatures now, and it appears to be working on them because none of them are below 98, but it still is reading that im 93! Now this means im officially cool,:) but on the other hand, it also means im not hot :(.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mittopotahis
So unless I am reading it wrong, the 13 people born before 1965 are 0% and therefore do not exist
Sucks to be them, eh?
Sucks to be studying this so much you post less than a minute after me
1989 pwns all yo' asses men!
No, actually it's a well known fact that 1989 is inferior to 1992 and 1979 and it also has a complex in regards to 1999.
Can you do one which desplays where the top 100 posters mainly stick to? (same as with the other one, just limiting the number of members)
What about one showing posts by members who joined between 2001 and present versus people who joined before 2001?
Or is that one a little out there? :D
It would be better with 2003 down vs 2004 + 2005.
I want to see what percentage of PiP's posts are in closed threads.
That would actually be a pretty low percent, now if you want my deleted post percentage... actually, the closed thread percentage would be higher (I hope).
Or a percentage for each member would be interesting.
Well, can I have Kyono's member?
Surely that's a comment to keep for the bedroom.
I remember a time when people born in 86 were the most prevalent on this site. The crazy 88s have overtaken us!
Ha! I'm a minority in the year chart! :)
I demand Affirmative Action! :D
Oh! Can we get number of males versus number of females?
Males: 19,500Quote:
Originally Posted by SammieBabe
Females: 1
Males pretending to be Females: 499
Are you offering to put on a yellow suit and deal with them for us?Quote:
Originally Posted by Miriel
That's a black suit you color-blind goth!
Can you do stats of how many people post by country, or anything liek that? I saw something like that here: http://forums.randi.org ; I thought it was cool.
bennator: I'm pretty sure those stats are already open for viewing here.
The top 100 members thing is possible to work out but would require me going through the posts of every one of the top 100 posters, and that's something not even I am willing to go through with.
I can find the male vs. female one without much hassle at all, I'll add that to the list of things to check out.
I'm not sure on how easy/difficult the year vs. year stuff would be. I'll look into that a bit more when my mind isn't as occupied as it is right now.
EoFF should be an 89ers and before message board.
http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c1...is/KillJon.jpgQuote:
Originally Posted by Flying Mullet
ToD's tie is too thin and his stomach is too fat to be a Crazy 88.
What's the GNP of EoFF?
$0
'88 for shya~
Yeah, thanks for reminding me that I'm older than a good percentage of the children here.
Imagine how us ancient people feel....:)Quote:
Originally Posted by Orestes
Wow....you're even older than an old fart like me!
Could you do the top 100 posters then?
That's easy though.
I'm sure it would be.
No postcounts, though.
Loony BoB
ShlupQuack
Del Murder
eestlinc
Psychotic
Leeza
Rye
Yamaneko
Kawaii Ryűkishi
nik0tine
cl_out
Chaos Prophecy.Crash..
rubah
DMKA
Flying Mullet
Neel With A Hat
Mandinka
TheAbominatrix
Behold the Void
Agent Proto
Meat Puppet
Pureghetto
Darth Holmes
Bert
Destai
RSL
Citizen Bleys
Big D
m4tt
Raistlin
Dr Unne
Kirobaito
Old Manus
Dreddz
theundeadhero
Monkey
fire_of_avalon
Rainecloud
Hsu
boris no no
Necronopticous
Ultima Shadow
Bladen
Giga Guess
The Man
kikimm
edczxcvbnm
Trumpet Thief
Xander
DJZen
Baloki
The Captain
Doomie
Lord Xehanort
Strider
Resha
GunbladeMaster
lionx
Lindy
TasteyPies
Rase
Samuraid
Mercen-X
Craig
SomethingBig
Black Mage 121
Zeldy
Hawkeye
Dking'squeen
Mikztsu
Primus Inter Pares
Sexy McAwesome
Levian
DocFrance
Christmas
senator_padme
Calliope
Miriel
boys from the dwarf
Skyblade
Misfit
Doomgaze
Rusty
Azar
eternalshiva
Ouch!
Sweet_Angel
Maxx Power
aeris2001x2
black orb
udsuna
Rengori
§hĺd0w
Mo-Nercy
Cloud No.9
Omecle
Carnage
ZeZipster
bbomber72000
Jebus
THERE'S NO PRETTY GRAPH THING!
You could at least graph it without putting any values on it.
With 100 labelled names? I don't think so! That's bad gravy, man. I told you guys I wasn't dealing with individual postcount stuff, so that's enough as it is. :p Not to mention that a bar graph without numbers is awful and a pie graph should never be used for such a large number of individual members.
How about a country breakdown, i.e. what percent of the members are from which country?
Pie graph at the bottom of this page is the best I can do, given that there is no 'Country' field in the forums database.
*looks at certain newbies high on the post count list*
I think you should be banned if you make more than 5,000 posts in a year, as there's no possible way to do that without being spammy and annoying.
I'm an 80's kid! Muhahaha.
eestlinc tops the posts for the past 365 days. At least three (probably more) of the staff have made over 5,000 posts in the past year, including him, I think.Quote:
Originally Posted by Raistlin
And I thought I was posting less. I've actually moved up one spot since last time.
Good lord, I post that much?
Dare I ask my postcount...
2952
That's not accurate.
So what IS it then?
EDIT : View all posts just shows since the last post cull, right?
MInes almost 5000 since the last prune :D
Hrmmm.....3943....less however many pruned posts.
Something I figured out during a discussion about our new admin. :)
Quote:
25th November 2001
20 Staffers.
192,428 posts.
11,775 threads.
3,044 members.
7th January 2006, over four years later.
18 Staffers. (5% decrease)
1,476,384 posts. (767% increase)
76,979 threads. (654% increase)
20,038 members. (658% increase)
So! We should have about 658% more staffers than 20, so that's... 131.6 staffers. :D Haha.
*notes the slump in post count after I quit* ;D *poses*
Jojo, your sig is so cute. All those cute little things put together in one place is far to cute for me. It's killing me. :love:
I'm not in the top 100 posters! Damn. :(
Why thank you Shuana. xD Since the ninja smileys were deleted (you cruel basturds ^^) I decided to abuse these ^_^! And you should get your arse in IRC cos' for once I'm there.
Also Bawb promised to make me staff to make up for the 600+% increases in everything else =D
Loony_BoB> I will make you an admin, Ojoj.
Monkey> Really, no it's okay Bawb, I'm hardly around. xD
Loony_BoB> But you are awesome.
Monkey> Okay then, if you insist ^_^
Yeah me and Jebus CKs too ;)
Haha, top seventh poster. xD
Nik, Paul and I are the only people in the top 10 to not be/have been on staff. :)
You never crossed out GunbladeMaster in that list :mad2:
Yay 1987 is in second place with 12%!
So those posters are all in order?? I'm in 12th place!! Yet I've only been here, soon to be a year...
I thought TOD post quite a lot too.
Nah, he didn't he just posted in most threads making it seem like he posted more than he did.
Oh look, PiP's banned! Which brings me to this:
From #eoff on Jan 10th...
[11:54] <Loony_BoB> When Good Mods Get Mad: Ban Counts!
[11:55] <Loony_BoB> Tied, in 17th place, fire_of_avalon and Xander, both with four bans a piece!
[11:55] <Loony_BoB> In 16th sits ShlupQuack, with five bans to her name!
[11:56] <Loony_BoB> Kishi, being one of the longest term staffers, has banned only six members since the banlogs included "Banned by" fields!
[11:56] <Loony_BoB> rubah, one of the newer Knights, has so far managed seven, putting her at 14th!
[11:57] <Loony_BoB> But you (talking to clout at the time) still got eight bans! Same as Big D, making you 12th equal~
[11:57] <Loony_BoB> New mod Hsu equals RSL's tally of nine bans! 10th position tied with them!
[11:58] <Loony_BoB> 9th goes to Behold the Void, sliding his name up the ranks!
[11:58] <Loony_BoB> kikimm has kik'ed 12 members - 8th place secured!
[11:59] <Loony_BoB> But Necro has done three better, managing 15 bans to put him in at 7th!
[11:59] <Loony_BoB> Del Murder has pushed a solid 18 members out of EoFF, meaning he's in 6th!
[12:00] <Loony_BoB> 5th is someone who we've not seen around for a while - m4tt managed a good 21 bans
[12:01] <Loony_BoB> eternal essence's "queen of the bans" is indeed the queen, being the highest in the bancounts when it comes to the female gender - 25 bans, 4th place!
[12:02] <Loony_BoB> 29 bans go to myself, putting me in at #3!
[12:02] <Loony_BoB> You think he doesn't do anything, but you're wrong! Yams spends his time in the forums banning people, with 33 to his name so far, putting him in at second!
[12:03] <Loony_BoB> And rumour has it that not even EoFF Sniper has taken out more members than eestlinc, the #1 staffer for bans in less than a year on staff at EoFF, with a mighty 35! Don't piss eest off, or he'll get you.
Also: Approximately one in every 40 EoFF members is banned.
I'm sure I banned more than a few, BoB. I'm not on the list. :(
I banned two second accounts yesterday. Go me.
I bet Yams does nothing but watch for people to ban. Those that he's too lazy to ban (the vast majority), he sends to eestlinc.
You're the "queen of the bans" mentioned. :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeza
I think you're fourth. Edit: Oh okay, he beat me to it. I'm still hip though.Quote:
Originally Posted by Leeza
I know this is supposed to say when Good Mods Get Mad, but when did EoFF ever have any good mods? Still, I agree about them going mad... :pQuote:
Originally Posted by BoB
I think Unne mentioned something recently about Leeza going mad with power. He's probably right.
You have to remember, though, that most of my bans come from forum attacks consisting of mass porn posting and the like.
I probably banned some people before it kept track of who did the banning.
So basically you sit around EoFF waiting for porn?Quote:
Originally Posted by Yams
Can we plz get some cool stats. I would like to see how much most of us super vets have posted over years. I wonder if you could do a graph of posting activity for how active vets have been over the years from the start to the end. Like posts per day. I think crazy crap like that would be interesting.
Sixteenth? Pfft. When you start doing that adminning me on weekends thing we discussed I'll be sure to dedicate some time on Saturdays to banning.
How many have I banned? It has to be in the tens of thousands. Or else the MB wasn't counting during my dark reign of bannage.
It didn't count before the vB3 upgrade.
Then my count must be higher than yours, Yams. :)
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rye
Same here--February 9. ^_^
I make Yams do all my banning for me.
Im an '87 :cool:
No graph for the bannage? :(
If every Zodiac Year had a color, the Monkey would be Purple. Proof in the first chart of Loony Bob's first post. >_>
Nice charts, my friend.
This latest stat sickens me.
35! Yes! Many of those are from the "loony bob penetrated me" banfest. I think the first person I ever banned was Rasputen.
Rasputen was my best friend, eest
Then I'm sure you know exactly why he was banned.
I'm surprised I have that many. A few porn posters and some trolls, I think.
I banned myself once, for about a minute. :D
That probably doesn't count.
w00t 12% 1987 :cool:
He's forgiven you since, though. However, that loony bob impregnated me can hold quite a grudge...Quote:
Originally Posted by eestlinc
They had to fight for their baby and support that love child, so it's no wonder loony bob impregnated me is as tough as steel. No one will bring them down!Quote:
Originally Posted by Psychotic
In lbim's case, it's not hold, but carry. And it's not a grudge, it's aQuote:
Originally Posted by Psychotic
babychick.
Close, though.
I want more in depth details plz. Release them all! It is 2022 now and the forums are dead.