Printable View
what do you think about this for me i think that it is unconstitutional.
for those that dont know whateminent domain is it is a law that says if the government finds certain areas blighted the law has the right to buy the people off of the property and if they dont cooperate they can just take it and build over it
i believe that this is like a reverse robinhood taking homes from the middle class and making malls and restuarants.
thats sounds wrong:( ..... then again our government can be a pain:mad2:
It has its ups and downs. In some places it has revitalized towns, taking "slums" and turning them into tourist/shopping attractions that generate jobs and income for the town as a whole. Whereas other places it doesn't do much good, other than to pad some developer's pocket.
Another common use of eminent domain is for public works, typically roads and highways. Again, this has its ups and downs.
Basically it comes down to the needs of one versus the needs of the masses, and which is greater.
i understand that except when it takes a place with family memories and changes it into a mall which the people may not want or need
That's pretty much it.Quote:
Originally Posted by Bantam
I'm not familiar with this law, but I wonder if it could also be used in the event of an incident or a major disaster, and the government or the police needs to take over your property to deal with the crisis...
I think usually they use it to get land to expand roadways, at least around here. It's sorta a creepy right of the government, and really should make people uncomfortable.
Especially since it's now okay for the government to take your house and sell the land to Wal-Mart.
If you don't do it somebody else will.
Sephiroth's Cage, you seem to be msising where it's the *government* that 'asks' you, not you offering it up. They're supposed to reimburse you, but you can't really do anything about it.
I had sympathy for you before you said middle class. Just kidding! That's happening in an area near where I used to live. The place is run down, an it's rough, an it's better for all involved if it is all knocked down an rebuilt. The people who had to move got paid the highest price they could possibly get if it was up for sale. So they didn't really get a bad deal. An since the place is a dump anyway, most people are glad to get out of there. So it's not always a bad thing.
I like this law, but I am also a fan of Imperialism, under good leadership.
With how greedy the senate is right now I don't trust them at all. It pissed me off when I first heard about it, this isn't Monarchy it's Democracy. When they take land from those that live on it I find it annoying that they can first of all get away with it and second of all the government gets a prophit from it.
Its democratic. Even if you don't get to vote on the issue (though in some cases I'm sure you'd get to) the people making the decisions are the ones voted into office so its supposed to work the same. Though it doesn't, that's how we've diseased the democratic system. And even if they do get to vote on the situation itself, it's the whole city, not just the people living on the property that get to vote. So if the area as a whole isn't very sympathetic they'd get voted off anyway. Democracy isn't always right and just. Its just the best way to express who needs what the most
Eminent domain, in cases of roads, ect. might be justified. Eminent domain for private developers is not constitutional, and it is not democratic. It is government putting lobbyists ahead of the people who they are supposed to represent, and there is no excuse. :mad:
It sounds wrong, it shouldnt be:mad:
Since this is usually used for road expansion, I think it's fine.
sad
I agree that it can be a good thing in certain situations. One problem I've heard of though, is that some of the people involved in making the deals with private landowners will slash the actual value of the property (regardless of any appraisal the landowner might provide) in order to save themselves a few development dollars. So a guy with a house worth, say, $150,000.00, might be offered $90,000.00. His options are to take the loss, or take nothing at all...
I'd just like to point out that the US is a republic, not a democracy.