Which of the two tactics is the best? Tactics, or Tactics Advance?
For me, it's Tactics.
Printable View
Which of the two tactics is the best? Tactics, or Tactics Advance?
For me, it's Tactics.
N ever played Advance so I will say Tactics.
Tactics of course
Tactics for sure :)
Hey purple, you are from Mexico too? cool :)
Tactics Advance. I just beat this. ^^ Of course, I haven't played Tactics, but I don't plan to. TA has Nu Mous, Vieras, Bangaas... It's much more well done, and balanced, battle-wise.
Plus, great characters like Babus and Mewt. Though I'm sure Tactics is a great game that I would like, I just don't think it will make a big impact on my gaming life as TA did.
Yes, probably FFTA have a lot of characters and a lot of missions, but i think Tactics is best because the dramatic history about the nobles and commoners, catch you since the first time you start to play it.Quote:
Originally Posted by auhin
and it have a lot of jobs; and four hidden characters and 2 hidden bosses.
Yeah, i think the best is Tactics:kaoplain:
I only played Tactics Advance, which was pretty good. I had a save file with 100+ hours on it, and completed 296 missions (I missed out on the remaining 4). Anyway I can't be bothered playing it again and completing all 300 missions.
Don't make me decide...:cry: They're both wonderful games! :cat:
I personally preferred Tactics over Tactics Advance.
Final Fantasy Tactics Advance, only because it worked for me in the area of satisfaction, getting tons of things done, and well, the competence to survive in the game. i tried to play the original, but i guess i'll never be a good general...
I haven't played much of FFTA, but so far, I prefer FF Tactics. I don't think FFTA is a bad game, but compared to FFT (especially in terms of storyline and the battle system), it just feels like an inferior game in so many ways.
Tactics. Sephiroth1999AD knows the score.
Behold the power of Tactics O.oQuote:
Originally Posted by Zeromus_X
I have to disagree about the storyline. While FFT had a good story, so much of it was convulted and made too many strieds to make itself look theologically insightful (and, in my mind, failed when compared to games like Xenogears), and did this at the price of creating a nearly completely incoherent story. The storyline for FFTA I actually liked better; it's almost sickeningly whimsical on the outside, but incredibly deep if you look further into it; I could probably write an entire essay on the subject, but won't do so in this post for the sake of keeping this to at least a medium length.Quote:
Originally Posted by Sephiroth1999AD
I'd be hard pressed to say that FFTA was inferior in any way; as a whole, I technically found it to be the superior game. I enjoyed the battle system much more, and the addition of other races allowed a kind of small look into the way other cultures in this world survived. I could go on and on, but will stop now for I must go to lunch.
FFTA. The story is disagreeable (who wants to leave a place where ownage is real?) but the battles never feel repetitive as some time you have an archer at an unreachable point and sometimes u have to work around with like 20 spaces of land! I didn't play T so you may disregard my post and everyone else who didnt play both
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryth