Rage Against the Machine or Audioslave? Who do you prefer? I prefer Rage Against The Machine by far. Audioslave is good, but when they were rage, they rocked!!
Thats my opinion, what is yours?
EDIT: Sorry for spelling the name wrong.:(
Printable View
Rage Against the Machine or Audioslave? Who do you prefer? I prefer Rage Against The Machine by far. Audioslave is good, but when they were rage, they rocked!!
Thats my opinion, what is yours?
EDIT: Sorry for spelling the name wrong.:(
Rage Against the Machine. :jess:
While I really like both bands, Audioslave wins for me on this one. I just prefer Chris Cornell's singing to Zack de la Rocha's. Plus Like A Stone is one of my favorite songs I have ever listened to, so that helps :). o and btw, Tom Morello is a GOD on guitar!!!
Damn stright man. You tell it to 'em!:) Brad Wilk is one of my favorite drummers.Quote:
Originally Posted by Mythra
RATM got annoying. Audioslave ftw.
This is pretty much my view on the matter.Quote:
Originally Posted by I Am Stoner
Give or take.
Here or there.
Rage against the machine ftw
RATM is my favorite band.
I voted RATM. I like Audioslave's first album, for the most part, but I haven't been impressed with their newer stuff...
However, I think Soundgarden beats them both out! I can never get enough of Superunkown (the album, as opposed to the song).
I actually think Audioslave is prettyty except for a few songs. I always liked RATM and they will always be better in my eyes.
I liked Soundgarden better than Audioslave too.
This guy know it. Soundgarden kick ass!! RATM kicked ass!! Come to think of it, why did Zack de la Rocha leave the band?Quote:
Originally Posted by Æ¿æƒ2
Because He Went Crazy BIATCH!! but quite seriously I think the band left him, because of his Whacked out attitude...Quote:
Originally Posted by I Am Stoner
RATM have always been a better band, they are so political, and just all around excellent, plus I think thatZack De La Rocha has always had a more unique and better voice than Chris Cornell (Soundgarden Does rule though)
Neither.
BLASPHEMY! *throws Zack De La Rocha at face.Quote:
Originally Posted by Arucard
Rage Against the Machine.
I would go with Rage and Soundgarden ... i can't stand audioslave ... don't know why, i just see red when i hear their music >.<
The lead singer of RATM has the most annoying voice in the world. And I dont know of Audioslave.
So neither.
flippin Rage are flippin awesome!!!
Audioslave never stood naked with duct tape on their faces and giant letters drawn on their torso's in front of thousands of people expecting them to play now did they?
Rage Against The Machine! They're the ones who freakin blew as many people off as they could. Like that PMRC stunt wich maxx explained. And their music is better.
Rage all the way.
RATM, but mostly because I'm an old nostalgic fart.
sooooo...that's a good thing? If audioslave did that they would be a better band?Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxx Power
Twice as good in fact...Quote:
Originally Posted by farplaner
Rage - plain and simple, Rage Against the Machine is by far the better of the two.
Hmmmm....you learn something new every day. However, I think this supports the argument that learning isn't always a constructive activity... :tongue:Quote:
Originally Posted by Shine On...Twice as good in fact...Quote:
Originally Posted by farplaner
Gunther and the Sunshine Girls > Both.
I loved RATM, I dearly miss them
I've hated both. Though I never knew there was a corrolation. Not that that has anything to do with why I hate them. And yes, Zack had the most annoying voice. He argued more than he sang. And you could tell he was spitting the whole time. And I'm not a big fan of Soundgarden since we seem to be on that subject. There's better alternative music out there. There's better rock. And there's better ballads. All three bands are horribly below average in my music collection (which they aren't a part of. Once a month on the radio is more than enough for me)
rage owns audioslave :P although audioslave are pretty good rage ftw