Clearly, the minimum wage needed to be reduced for productivity measures; micro-economic reform encourages firms to increase their labour:capital ratio. In the macro-economy, this has the effect of decreasing unemployment and stimulating aggregate demand. As the economy reaches the NAIUR (Non-Accelerating Inflation Rate of Unemployment) productivity boons are reflected in the CPI (Consumer Price Index), thus, curbing inflation. Most exorbitant British goods are manufactured locally. Imports are, ironically, cheaper, in relative terms. That is to say, an Italian car is more cost effective than a loaf of bread. Sadly, Britain is a great example of domestic price tyranny ... and the colloquialism: How much is a carton of Milk? - reflecting the premium that Brits pay for Giffen goods is not exaggerated. Britain also faces some pretty tough income inequality ... one of the highest in Europe.
So, why didn't Thatcherisms work? Because monetarist shock therapy affected the total economy, not just firms. Adjusting interest rates to control prices, stimulate the money market and improve loanable funds (liquidity) had many unforseen negative consequences. Inflated British pounds altered foreign buyers' preferences and hence Britain's glorious export industry collapsed, virtually overnight. Demand mechanisms control the FOREX market, so buyers simply shopped elsewhere in Europe.![]()
Thatcher's legacy has since damaged British aspirations to curb inflation; it is generally held that any attempts toward monetary reform will adversely conjure up bad memories of the 1980's. Joining the EU is a socialist policy that achieves much the same, however. Privatising most of Britains public services was the only good move on her behalf.
Best remedy would now be tax reform.
Cheers