Nintendo + Pokemon = Evil Genius

[Lionx]

It also has the wonderful underlying themes of animal cruelty and "my pet can beat the crap out of your pet." What's not to love?

the pink elephant o.o

Lol sorry xD <3

[Ashley Schovitz]

^Strategy yeah right. The game's battles are basically just a game of paper, rock, scissors. I haven't played them since Silver and Gold either. It got lame after that. Oh and I heard that Pokem,on Ranger got 3's and 4's from almost every game critiquing media.

[Azure Chrysanthemum]

^Strategy yeah right. The game's battles are basically just a game of paper, rock, scissors. I haven't played them since Silver and Gold either. It got lame after that. Oh and I heard that Pokem,on Ranger got 3's and 4's from almost every game critiquing media.

A bit more complicated than rock-paper-scissors, actually. The type matchups are easy to learn, yes, but creating a team that can both cover its own weaknesses and exploit another team's weaknesses? That's definitely a challenge.

[Firo Volondé]

I liked Gold the best, with the days system making sure I played it pretty much every day. After that, it just got too complicated for me, and I think I grew out of it.

[Polnareff]

A bit more complicated than rock-paper-scissors, actually. The type matchups are easy to learn, yes, but creating a team that can both cover its own weaknesses and exploit another team's weaknesses? That's definitely a challenge.

I'll agree with Ashley about the first 3 games being more R-P-S than strategy, but what you said here, Void, I agree with, and it actually applies more to the newer Pokemon games (like Ruby and Sapphire). Since, you know, there were Pokemon with two types and all in those games.

Giving some Pokemon two types really changed up the strategy because instead of just being able to switch your Pokemon out after seeing that you have a fire type and your opponent has a water type, you are forced to change strategies accordingly.

[No.78]

The games all about the multiplayer n stuff.