Oh, I thought you were talking about plot flaws. I wouldn't really call those things flaws, though, since those qualities in a movie is up to everyones personal taste.

Quote Originally Posted by Aralith
In Saw II, this didn't happen nearly as much. I think Obi and Xavier were the only two who had proper traps set up, and Xavier didn't even get to do his task. He had some innocent do it (this was part of the character development. He would have people use drugs and now to escape his poetic justice, he used someone again. This was one of the reasons why I cared about Xavier). Also, some of the shock was lacking in Saw II. We already knew who the killer was and why he was doing the things he was. Which leads to another flaw. In the first film, he only ever had one or two people in one trap at a time and only in one room. This made everything feel much more cramped and in turn, made the atmosphere much more intense.
Yes, there definitely should've been more personal traps in Saw 2, but for all we know there probably were. There were 8 syringes in the house, and we got to see 5 of them, so there's probably 3 hidden traps we didn't get to see in the house. But everyone we saw was personalized though, so there's every reason to believe the rest was too. Laura's death was really lame, though. What a useless character. The trap Addison was in was probably personalized too, though. She threw away the tape and just went for it, so it could've been for anyone really. I'm going to guess it was for a cutter. Maybe Amanda?

All of the Saw movies has been really rushed, though. Half a year scriptmaking and two weeks or so of shooting. But I'm glad they do it that way or the twist would be bound to get leaked on the internet somehow.

I really hope Saw 4 turns out better than Saw 3.