http://www.metacritic.com/games/plat...0Fantasy%20X-2
FFX-2 is not considered a bad game by most people.
http://www.metacritic.com/games/plat...0Fantasy%20X-2
FFX-2 is not considered a bad game by most people.
I'm just going to post a new "rule" or at least guideline.
If it received over a 6 on a 10 point scale, or 3 on a 5 point scale, then it doesn't belong here. I would've stated Mystic Heroes before, but IGN gave it a 6, and the readers gave it a 7, but by the games you all are saying, it's rated as complete crap. I mean FFX-2 was an 8, Pokemon was an 8 as well, at least. And I lol at Halo 2.
I also enjoyed Mega Man 64, and the later Battle Network games which are considered bad compared to the older ones.
THE JACKEL
add me, PSN: ljkkjlcm9
Check out the user rating. 8.0 out of 10.0. Nobody was "paid off." There are just a lot of people who care about gameplay more than story.
http://www.gamerankings.com/htmlpages2/562386.asp
Mega Man Xtreme for the Game Boy Color. I smurfing LOVED that game.
Hell no! Morrowind is boring like hell, worst RPG ever in my books, even not RPG, some boring exploring-bad combat game. In my books, no story, no characters with personality - no RPG game, period, no discussion here. Yes, Morrowind doesn't hold your hand or whatever else, it just doesn't hold, lol. If you like wandering through 1000 exactly the same maps and fighting 50000 exactly the same NPCs than so called PC RPG games are for you, Morrowind being worst of them. Idea that RPG can have open end is sick! The good story has to have a very great end. RPG can't give you freedom to do whatever you want, that's other games which have such option. I would write more what's RPG is about that's not a place.
Back on topic, I will go with MMORPG, it's Runescape, I know it's not a good game, I still play it time to time, I have no idea why![]()
Stop the Earth! I want to get out!...
I can't think of any really bad games I like, just some that are not well regarded.
Quake 1 single player- It's got a paper-thin plot that was added after the game was complete, it's thematically incoherent, and the weapons and items were mostly imported from Doom, but I liked it a lot anyway. I preferred it to Duke Nukem 3D single player, which was generally regarded as superior.
Doom 3- Not considered to be bad, but overly simplistic and retro (funny, DQ 8 gets praise for the same reasons). Perhaps it's just the fact that I hadn't played any FPSs for years prior to playing D3, but I liked its highly polished old-school style. I enjoyed it more than Half-Life 2, though I think that HL2 is "objectively" better.
"...a challenge you can solve by leveling up isn't really a challenge. It's a test of patience and not really 'gameplay' at all. Take for example some of the maniacal timed jumps you have to master in Super Mario 2, the Japanese version. If you could simply make yourself jump higher and fall slower by pounding on 10,000 goombas, this would completely circumvent all the design put into making the individual boards difficult. "
-John Ford, from alt.games.final-fantasy
I own Half life 2 (on xbox) and it kinda sux. I played it on PC and was marveled by the difference of how much better it was. Simply Xbox ports of PC games are total CRAP!
I think this thread has been titled wrong.
they are not bad if the person likes it.