PS3 or 360?

[escobert]

yeah, almost looked like the disc came that way. but it did it to a brand new Gears of War which didn't have the marks before hand.

[Slicksword45]

In my opnion, The Ps3 is better. It has more promesing exclusives (MGS4 FFXII, FF Vs. XII, Littlebigplanet, Resistance 2 (When ever they get around to makeing that XD), Rachet and Clank: [Inscert subcaption that I forgot here], Lair, Heavenly Sword, Killzone 2, Ninja Gaiden: Sigma, Warhawk, The Eye of Jugment, Uncharted: Drakes Fortune, Eight Days, And all those other games I don't remember. Now just if I had the money to pay for all those games....)

[fantasyjunkie]

Right now i have the 360 but I'll eventually end up having the 360, PS3, and the Wii side by side just like I had the Xbox, PS2 and gamecube.
I just wish my PSP wasn't gathering dust

[GF_Diablos]

I've had both and trust me the PS3 is a vastly superior console.

[Project G]

I would go for the Xbox cos if u live in europe (Like I do), the ps3 will only play a few ps2 games, which will irritate everyone who spent years building a decent library of games only to find out that they don't work! Grrrrrrrr

[Loony BoB]

I would go for the Xbox cos if u live in europe (Like I do), the ps3 will only play a few ps2 games, which will irritate everyone who spent years building a decent library of games only to find out that they don't work! Grrrrrrrr

So you're saying that people should get the 360 because the PS3 won't play some of your PS2 games? I'd love to know how many of your PS2 games will play on your 360.

[Tifa's Real Lover(really]

360

[Slicksword45]

I would go for the Xbox cos if u live in europe (Like I do), the ps3 will only play a few ps2 games, which will irritate everyone who spent years building a decent library of games only to find out that they don't work! Grrrrrrrr

ummm... first, the 360 only plays a few Xbox games. cmon. try playing Riddick. I dare you XD

Second, The ps3 already plays over 1,000 games, and more are being added.

[Slothy]

I would go for the Xbox cos if u live in europe (Like I do), the ps3 will only play a few ps2 games, which will irritate everyone who spent years building a decent library of games only to find out that they don't work! Grrrrrrrr

ummm... first, the 360 only plays a few Xbox games. cmon. try playing Riddick. I dare you XD

Second, The ps3 already plays over 1,000 games, and more are being added.

Precisely. Unless of course you live in North America and get one of the ones with a built in PS2; then it plays all of the games.

[Discord]

I've actually found this table pretty informative.

http://www.winsupersite.com/showcase...60_ps3_wii.asp

On a side note, 70 Euro is a bit much for a game, IMO. That's the only reason why I'm reconsidering not getting either.

[Project G]

I would go for the Xbox cos if u live in europe (Like I do), the ps3 will only play a few ps2 games, which will irritate everyone who spent years building a decent library of games only to find out that they don't work! Grrrrrrrr

So you're saying that people should get the 360 because the PS3 won't play some of your PS2 games? I'd love to know how many of your PS2 games will play on your 360.

No, no, no! I said PS2 games on PS3 not on 360, and I researched into the ps3 and I found out that with the euro version, the owner will have to download various things just to play ps2 games which I think is too much hassle, sony have pissed me off because of this, they are trying to squeeze us out of more money! First we spend at least £300 on the console, then a further £40 on just one game, then knowing sony, it will not work in a few months so we will have to get it repaired! I dunno, maybe I'm too much of an anti-consumerist, but I just would like a decent console, with decent games and with it being reliable! So 360 all the way

[Loony BoB]

The PS3 is a decent console, it will have decent games and it is reliable. No, it won't play a bunch of certain PS2 games, but the 360 won't play any PS2 games (obviously). If you want to play PS2 games, keep your PS2... it's not like it will sell for much these days anyway.

As for the cost, last time I checked if you wanted your 360 to have the hard drive, HD-DVD thing, etc. then you need to pay pretty much the same amount. And games, I think, are roughly the same too. So there's no real difference outside of the fact that PS3 doesn't have a "budget" version without all the extras. Hell, they did it in the US and it didn't sell enough to warrant a European version - everyone wanted the more expensive version. Go figure.

[Croyles]

No, no, no! I said PS2 games on PS3 not on 360, and I researched into the ps3 and I found out that with the euro version, the owner will have to download various things just to play ps2 games which I think is too much hassle, sony have pissed me off because of this, they are trying to squeeze us out of more money! First we spend at least £300 on the console, then a further £40 on just one game, then knowing sony, it will not work in a few months so we will have to get it repaired! I dunno, maybe I'm too much of an anti-consumerist, but I just would like a decent console, with decent games and with it being reliable! So 360 all the way

Lol. Anti-consumerist on the internet.
The european PS3 already plays loads of PS2 games and more are coming. Hassle? Not for me.

"Do you want to run a update?"
*selects yes*

On a side note, 70 60 Euro is a bit much for a game, IMO. That's the only reason why I'm reconsidering not getting either.

[Loony BoB]

I just found out that you can plug in pretty much any regular hard drive, keyboard, mouse, etc. into a PS3 but you have to shell out double-price-per-GB for a 360 drive. I think that's swayed me back from on-the-fence to favouring PS3... whenever it is that I bother buying a next-gen console.

[Mirage]

Hm, now that FFXIII isn't a PS3 exclusive, I'm not sure. If MGS4 goes multiplatform too, I'll definitely get a 360.