I really do think it's a shame about that since as far as I'm concerned the arc not only made a lot of sense in the end, but was Whedon's best yet. Yeah that whole issue and those moments were just plain wierd and off the wall, but that was kind of the point. I'm not going to knock your opinion though since you're entitled to it. It seems you have a healthy love and respect for a lot of the classics which I can appreciate and understand and my hats off to you for it. If some of the newer blood doesn't tickle your fancy then there's nothing wrong with that.
Agreed on all of that. It's those stories that show why Wolverine is a great hero when done correctly; not indestructable skeletons and healing from any injury.
I can agree with that to a certain extent. No the comics won't ever really end, and retcons can be a pain, but it always seems to me that a lot of the best writers try to avoid that whenever possible. A lot of my favourite writers and titles actually introduce huge changes, or bring back old continuity in the process of making great stories. And often now a days the comic book deaths actually do have meaning, and characters see some closure. Jean Grey for example hasn't been brought back since Morrison killed her several years ago now, and she's the Pheonix for god's sake. In fact, Marvels editor-in-chief, Joe Quesada doesn't like the practice of constantly bringing back dead characters. Though he's somewhat relaxed his stance against it in the last few years, he still prefers it not happen. Also, I think that because books run in definite story arcs, and since writers are often on only for a few years at most usually, it makes it much easier to simply drop a book. A lot of writers will tie up many of their loose ends before passing off the book to someone else allowing readers to get some closure, particularly if they don't want to continue reading it under a new writer.






Reply With Quote