Results 1 to 15 of 61

Thread: 1.3333.. does NOT equal 4/3!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    One Hundred Chimneys Recognized Member Tavrobel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Conjunction Junction
    Posts
    10,455
    Articles
    102
    Contributions
    • Former Site Staff

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jessweeee♪ View Post
    This is what 3/10 looks like on paper.
    Thanks for the approximation and using the rules of significant figures.

    Continuing on...

    Quote Originally Posted by Jessweeee♪ View Post
    While we're on the subject of math, what does any number with an exponent of zero equal one instead of zero or that same number?
    An exponent is really division/multiplication, except in this case, an exponent is a multiplied number multiplied many times. So 4<sup>2</sup> is 16 (4*4), or 6<sup>3</sup> is 216 (6*6*6), or can be expressed as 6<sup>1+1+1</sup>. Simply put, exponents represent how many times a number is multiplied by itself. Is it still not itself when it is alone?

    Exponential numbers can be modified by adding and subtracting, a shortcut for signifying that a number can be multiplied that many number of times. There are such things as identities, numbers you use to keep a number that you have. For exponents, an identity is anything to the X<sup>1</sup> == X. Exponents already use to the first power as equalling itself. Addition uses N+0 == N, N*1=N, N<sup>1</sup> == N.

    Let's take a number, a variable: (A)
    It can equal anything besides zero.

    Second variable: (n)
    This is our exponent.

    A<sup>n</sup>/A<sup>n</sup>, is the same as saying A<sup>n - n</sup>, since we can manipulate exponents however we want.

    What happens when we subtract any number from itself? We get zero, the additive identity. After all, A + 0 is still A. Applied to division, A<sup>n - n</sup> is the same as A<sup>0</sup>. When you divide anything by itself, it equals one. Therefore, A<sup>0</sup> == 1, as long as A != 0.

    There's a multiplicative proof using algebra, but the divison proof is easier to remember, even if it does use more mathematical theory than the other.
    Last edited by Tavrobel; 05-18-2007 at 11:40 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •