Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Tomb Raider: Anniversary

  1. #1
    carte blanche Breine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    9,061

    Default Tomb Raider: Anniversary

    Finally, the remake of the original Tomb Raider game is here. It looks pretty remarkable and so far the reviews are quite favourable. I'm totally going to go get it sometime this week when I have the time, but what about you? What do you think of this new Tomb Raider game? Discuss.

  2. #2
    Posts Occur in Real Time edczxcvbnm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2000
    Location
    The World
    Posts
    7,920

    Default

    Does it have the nude code? If they didn't at least implement that then the game is completely worthless.

  3. #3
    carte blanche Breine's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    9,061

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by edczxcvbnm View Post
    Does it have the nude code? If they didn't at least implement that then the game is completely worthless.
    Haha! xD No they didn't put that on in there. It would probably boost the sale quite a bit, though.

  4. #4

    Default

    Is it a remake? I might pick it up then, loved the original game.

  5. #5
    absolutely haram Recognized Member Madame Adequate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kirkwall
    Posts
    23,357

    FFXIV Character

    Hiero Dule (Brynhildr)
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by licence View Post
    Is it a remake? I might pick it up then, loved the original game.
    Aye, it is a remake.

    Oh man, back in the days when Tomb Raider was revolutionary... when the T-Rex was the most "JESUS CHRIST IT'S A T-REX GET IN DA CHOPPER" thing ever... might pick this up at some point

  6. #6

    Default

    Tomb Raider is a horrible franchise which should never of taken off. It was full of gimmicky touches which were never great to begin with.

  7. #7
    absolutely haram Recognized Member Madame Adequate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Kirkwall
    Posts
    23,357

    FFXIV Character

    Hiero Dule (Brynhildr)
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dreddz View Post
    Tomb Raider is a horrible franchise which should never of taken off. It was full of gimmicky touches which were never great to begin with.
    Uh no actually, the first two were pretty great.

  8. #8

    Default

    The series actually steadily improved until they hit rock bottom with that first PS2 Tomb Raider outing ( forget the name ). Legends seemed like an improvement, good thing that Anniversary's gameplay is based on that game. Still, slo mo and twin pistols is so cliched among games and movies that its really boring now.

    Ill give Anniversary credit for looking amazing, not just graphically but just how the game is presented. Top stuff.

  9. #9

    Default

    Legends really was great, I wish it was longer.

  10. #10

    Default

    Tomb Raider should have kicked off more than it did, rather than petering out after two outings.

    As for gimmicks, it was pretty much a 3D Prince of Persia and I can't really remember it trying to do much more than that.
    Word/s.

  11. #11
    Mold Anus Old Manus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    cumree
    Posts
    14,731
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    Nothing beats Tomb Raider III in terms of awesomness. It was so hard it became fun.


    there was a picture here

  12. #12

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maxico View Post
    As for gimmicks, it was pretty much a 3D Prince of Persia and I can't really remember it trying to do much more than that.
    The gimmicks came from being able to have tons and tons of weapons, duel wield. Everything. But they forgot to refine the gameplay so it was just you pointing in a general direction and blasting the hell out of everything. And as for the 3D Prince of Persia thing going on, I think they were only trying to have that style of gameplay. But it was still you only jumping platform to platform endlessly, these platforms werent designed to be in any interesting location to make them fun to get to, they were nearly always dead ahead.

  13. #13
    ..a Russian mountain cat. Yamaneko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    15,927
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    I have an account on GameTap so I'm downloading it right now.

  14. #14

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dreddz View Post
    The gimmicks came from being able to have tons and tons of weapons, duel wield. Everything. But they forgot to refine the gameplay so it was just you pointing in a general direction and blasting the hell out of everything. And as for the 3D Prince of Persia thing going on, I think they were only trying to have that style of gameplay. But it was still you only jumping platform to platform endlessly, these platforms werent designed to be in any interesting location to make them fun to get to, they were nearly always dead ahead.


    The first game had like 4 different weapons. The controls we're a little unrefined, but it was the one of the first really 3D games so that's a little understandable, there really weren't that many enemies at all in the first game and I always though one of the games strongpoints was it's level design.

    To each his own I guess, but all of your problems with the game sound wrong. Did you play the first game or one of the terrible sequals?
    Word/s.

  15. #15

    Default

    I am about halfway through this game now, though stuck in a place.

    It's both similar to Legend and yet not at the same time. It may look and control the same, but the pacing is reversed. Legend guided you through the environment softly, ensuring you never really got stuck or had trouble with any puzzles, then threw lots of action bits in between. Anniversary pits you against large and formidable environments with just a few fights here and there but nothing serious.

    I like both approaches, although Legend suits my personal taste better. I don't mind puzzles, but to be honest I don't like them to be too hard. Call me unintelligent or impatient or whatever you wish, but I like to look at a puzzle, figure it out, acrobatically flip through it, and leave it behind for good, not around around trying to figure out if the water should be raised two levels or three so I can push the block onto the banana peel and open the statue's mouth.

    That said, "hard" is not the correct word, as none of the puzzles in Anniversary have really been omg-I'm-stuck-wtf tough or anything. They're all decently easy, and they're well thought-out so they come off as the fun variety and not the "walk into a room and groan at what you see" kind. They're just larger and take more time than Legend's very linear design.

    I like the Adrenaline Dodge, and the button-pressing cinematics spawned from games like Shenmue and made popular by RE4 are also back. They're still really easy and damn near impossible to botch, but cool nonetheless.

    So far, the only problem I have with Anniversary is there's little need to use medi-packs to heal yourself. There are frequent checkpoints, and if you die you restart from the last one with full health. So if you ever get hurt, you can simply run to a Checkpoint spot, kill Lara on purpose, and then respawn with full health. It's very easy to exploit.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •