Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 63

Thread: Ps3 Price Drop

  1. #31
    Slothstronaut Recognized Member Slothy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    I'm in space
    Posts
    13,565
    Blog Entries
    27
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    The slightly gimped backwards compatibility kind of sucks, but at least it covers more games than the 360's. Hopefully Sony decides to add support to it in the future, but if not, at least I got my PS3 months ago.

  2. #32
    ..a Russian mountain cat. Yamaneko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    15,927
    Contributions
    • Former Administrator
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    If you're hardcore enough to still play your old PS2 games on your PS3 then you're the type of person that would keep their PS2. New game consoles are for new games (and new releases of old favorites for insane prices).

  3. #33
    oreodaredattoomotteyagaru Recognized Member JKTrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bermuda
    Posts
    3,352
    Articles
    42
    Blog Entries
    1
    Contributions
    • Former Editor
    • Former Site Staff

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vivi22 View Post
    ...but at least it covers more games than the 360's.
    Oh come on. You're comparing a Playstation library of 12 years of games to the Xbox which is only half as old. That's hardly an accomplishment.

    If they do what Microsoft is doing/has done and focus on their 'best selling games', this won't be an issue. If they can get the best/most popular PS2 games working, no one is going to care about 'crap licensed game X' not working on their console.

    Also, I wouldn't call this backwards compatibility thing 'slightly gimped'. This is still related to the PAL PS3 list from back in March so it's likely outdated (for one, I think MGS2 works fine now, where it wasn't working originally). The initial percentage of working PS1/PS2 games on PAL PS3:

    I haven't been able to find a comparable, more up-to-date list that is presented like this.

    I'm sure a large, possibly majority of the non-working games are games no one really cares about, so it would do them well to focus on the few n' proud.

    I still haven't seen Sony USA mention anything about the list of supported games, but it will come.

    Still if you're planning on getting a PS3, Kotaku's advice is sound.

  4. #34
    O Captain! My Captain! Spawn of Sephiroth's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Tennessee
    Posts
    999

    Default

    Im still not getting one until they release Final Fantasy XIII or Kingdom Hearts III, whichever is first.


    Loki: I have an army.
    Stark: We have a HULK!


  5. #35
    Slothstronaut Recognized Member Slothy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    I'm in space
    Posts
    13,565
    Blog Entries
    27
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JKTrix View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Vivi22 View Post
    ...but at least it covers more games than the 360's.
    Oh come on. You're comparing a Playstation library of 12 years of games to the Xbox which is only half as old. That's hardly an accomplishment.
    You misunderstood. I'm comparing the 360's 336 backwards compatible games to the (emulator using) PS3's 1,792 games with no known issues as quoted by you. Considering the relatively small library of games on the Xbox to begin with, and the headstart in implementing emulation, the fact that they haven't gotten more done is surprising.

  6. #36
    oreodaredattoomotteyagaru Recognized Member JKTrix's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Bermuda
    Posts
    3,352
    Articles
    42
    Blog Entries
    1
    Contributions
    • Former Editor
    • Former Site Staff

    Default

    True. I'm not exactly complimenting Microsoft's efforts either. While PS3's sucky backwards compatibility *isn't Sony's fault*, the 360's is to an extent.

    -Short history-
    Original Xbox had a graphics card from NVidia, 360 has graphics card from ATI. All Xbox 1 games--made for NVidia card--have to be modified to work.

    Sony had a 'Technical Requirements Checklist' in place for PlayStation games. If a game followed this checklist, it would assure compatibility with future PlayStations. Obviously, a bunch of games didn't stay within these guidelines, leading to the problem we have with this stuff. Shame on them!

    Perhaps Sony's not working on fixing something that isn't their fault is them thumbing their nose at the people who broke their rules.

    Yamaneko is right though. To be safe, keep your PS2s!

  7. #37
    Slothstronaut Recognized Member Slothy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    I'm in space
    Posts
    13,565
    Blog Entries
    27
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    I did keep my PS2 to continue playing games like Guitar Hero and to cover my butt in the event a game I have doesn't work (the fact that you can now transfer PSX/PS2 saves from you PS3 to a PSX/PS2 memory card helps with this). I've yet to encounter a game that doesn't work on my PS3, but like I said, I have one with the emotion engine built in. Keeping old systems is never a bad idea anyway, and if you needed to get one, a new PS2 is quite cheap anyway.

  8. #38
    Kermit Timerk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    The South
    Posts
    606

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by JKTrix View Post
    You mean to put the new PS3s in line with the old ones. It's the new PS3s that are gonna be gimped, with less games working than the old ones.
    I meant bring the old ones back in line with the new ones, but yes, that's the same thing you are talking about.

    I just talk different. Like Yoda. Or Slimer.

  9. #39

    Default

    I don't have time to read the thread but I'll post my thoughts.

    PS 3 doesn't have any top rpg's now that make me buy the system. I have to wait until Fall 08 when FF XIII and FF V XIII come out, I will definetely get PS 3 then. There's a chance I could get it in Spring 08 when White Knight Story comes out I believe.

    Wii: If I had more money and time I could have bought it on it's launch because Zelda is great. As far as the future I don't see any rpg's I like coming out.

    XB 360: Blue Dragon, Lost Odyssey, Mass Effect come out Aug/Oct/Jan! FF XI and Oblivion are also out as well, and other top rpg's also. XB 360 is great.

    Bottom line for me is that the system with the most top rpg's is the one I will get, although price is a factor and PS 3 is very very expensive!

    I got PS 2 again in last fall for FF VII: DoG and FF XII and Rogue Galaxy. I'm getting XB 360 in August just in time for Blue Dragon. By the way I'm getting Nintendo DS on September in time for Zelda(Oct 1st). I don't see me buying a PSP or Wii although I'll buy a Ps 3 later.
    Recently beaten: Alundra 1, Final Fantasy VII: Crisis Core
    Currently playing: Final Fantasy Tactics A2: Grimoire of the Rift, Final Fantasy I
    Will play next: The Elder Scrolls IV: Oblivion, Mass Effect, Fallout 3(???)
    *Last Update 7-25-2008

  10. #40

    Default

    its still not worth it just yet, cut off another $100 and release some good games then ill get it

    If I was like Cloud I don't think I would have taken that test.
    Changed to stop Jessweeee♪ from going insane. Is that better?

  11. #41
    Kermit Timerk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    The South
    Posts
    606

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dragonsoul View Post
    I don't have time to read the thread but I'll post my thoughts.
    I didn't have time to read your list-ey post....

    but I did skim it .

    You seem to ignore the fact that Oblivion is out for the PS3, and listing DoC as the reason to pick a system up is just...wrong.


  12. #42
    Is not wearing socks tidus_rox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    ... Ontario
    Posts
    973

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Vivi22 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Invisible View Post
    Okay, PS3 for Christmas. Hmm, then again, I really do need to wait for all the "bugs to be cleared."
    *cough*PlayStation 3 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia*cough*

    I'd say it's pretty safe to buy a PS3. Honestly, it's the best built system I've ever seen and I really haven't even heard of any problems so far. It seems that Sony certainly learned their lessons from providing shoddy first-gen hardware in the past.

    HAHA... okay so my friend in always like "OMG all's PS3's do is break! Wii's rule!" So I'm like "I hate Nintendo but just to proove you wrong..." So I bought a Wii. It was broken!!! YAY!

    I bought a PS3... the only think wrong with it is that the PS logo on the front can do a 360.

  13. #43
    praise the sun Nifleheim7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Samurai School
    Posts
    1,119

    Default

    I have three reasons for not buying a PS3 yet.
    The first one was it's price.
    The second one is because i'm waiting for the next versions to come out.By then all the bugs will be cleared and maybe it's price will drop more.
    Also there's not even one PS3 game that interests me atm.

  14. #44
    Slothstronaut Recognized Member Slothy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    I'm in space
    Posts
    13,565
    Blog Entries
    27
    Contributions
    • Former Cid's Knight

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nifleheim7 View Post
    The second one is because i'm waiting for the next versions to come out.By then all the bugs will be cleared and maybe it's price will drop more.
    Also there's not even one PS3 game that interests me atm.
    As I posted earlier; retailers are estimating the PS3 failure rate at less than 1%. I doubt waiting will get you any better odds of not getting a faulty console.

    I also find it hard to believe there's nothing that interests you on the PS3. I may hate the looks of the gaming lineups for the Wii and Xbox 360, but even I have to admit to one or two titles on each that I want to play (far from enough to get me to buy either of them, but still).

  15. #45
    Recognized Member Croyles's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    In his thoughts...
    Posts
    2,953
    Contributions
    • Former Site Staff

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Mirage View Post
    Drop it another 100 and we're talking. And of course a 20 GB bigger HDD doesn't cost 100 dollars, it's just a marketing trick, because they still seem to think that people want to shell out 600 for their piece of crap .
    The 80gb PS3 comes with Motorstorm, which costs 60$, so your not paying 100$ for 20 extra gigs. But I do have to admit that 60gb one is still a better deal. 60gb isnt enough for some, but it is for me. Motorstorm is a really fun game though, I havnt had that much fun in a racing game before, Burnout is close though.
    Sales have gone up 2.800% on amazon and its number one for gaming at the moment.
    Im loving my PS3 and there are at least 7 games I need to get that are coming out this year.
    Last edited by Croyles; 07-11-2007 at 03:10 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •