Again you disregard my analogy. The PS1 gave FFVII the capability to make advanced 3D graphics. Besides the 1st 3D FF is hardly "revolutionary". 3D was not some crazy far out idea. I can go all the way back to a game called Sonic 3D Blast on the Sega Genesis to find 3D games. Being the first at something isn't always revolutionary, lots of times its not even good. Look at Sonic's popularity, its 3D games have NEVER been as successful as its 2D games, nor has they're jump to 3D been conisdered revolutionary.
Again, please read my argument before trying to refute it. I said getting to the moon wasn't the actually revolutionary part, NASA showing its capabilities was, which is much like how FFVII isn't the actual revolutionary part, PS1's capabilities are. But really I'm done with this moonman argument because it has very little to do with the subject, it was more or less you not reading my analogy.
I haven't tried to change that. That was NEVER my side of the argument. My argument has been testing the revolutionary aspect of it being in 3D, and you've done very little to convince me that it is revolutionary. 3D had been done before, and 3D is not always success.
That doesn't seem like what he's saying, but at the same time, setting a trend is hardly revolutionary. FFIV set a trend for storytelling, FFI started a trend for gameplay. They've all started trends, MORE is needed for it to be revolutionary.
A final piece of my argument. You defined revolutionary as a sudden drastic change. 3D wasn't a sudden drastic change in the gaming world, many other games had 3D graphics before, so it wasn't very sudden or drastic at all.






