I'm pregnant

[Anaisa]

Quite frankly, the size of the -your- breasts is barely even close to my field of interests. Even more the case, I think this applied for pretty much everybody else on this forum.

I'm not the one who feels the need to inform the forum of my breast size, unlike you. The comment appeared to be directed at me, which is why I responded to it.

Anyway. The operation is available. I've seen a report on it from a serious tv-magazine over a year ago, so unless I'm travelling back in time, you're wrong.

Well there are plenty of articles that disagree, heres a couple more:Cytori Therapeutics - Cytori to Commercialize Stem Cell Therapy for Breast Reconstruction in Cancer Patients in Europe in Early 2008

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...nbreast109.xml


So all those articles are wrong, an the "serious tv-magazine" you read over a year ago is right? Serious TV magazine! An I could link you to numerous plastic surgery clinics, that aren't supplying that treatment. If it was available, they'd all be using it by now.

[Bunny]

I know I'm right an your wrong, because I've felt breast implants. The implants themselves, an breasts with the implants in them. So I know they're not soft. So yeah, obviously you saying: "No they are soft!" Isn't going to convince me. An if I agreed with you, an you agreed with me, we wouldn't even be discussing it. You can't argue with someone if you agree with them.

Your argument is based on the assumption that I have not experienced something you have. The fact of the matter is that I have felt fake breast, and I have felt natural ones as well. My argument was not with the texture or feel of the breasts themselves, but rather that appearance of them. You said they looked fake, and I am disagreeing with that matter. If the surgeon does a horrible job then they look horrible. Otherwise, they can look just as great, if not better, than natural ones.

I also wasn't making a comment towards the nature of the argument. My comment was directed towards the fact that you are one of those people who, despite all evidence that proves otherwise, refuses to give up your stance on any given subject during a debate because you have too much pride in yourself.

And just a little fyi, the word is "and". Quote marks go around quotes. Never once did I say those words. Please stop assuming things in a feeble attempt to enhance your argument on an already ignorant subject.

[Discord]

Quite frankly, the size of the -your- breasts is barely even close to my field of interests. Even more the case, I think this applied for pretty much everybody else on this forum.

I'm not the one who feels the need to inform the forum of my breast size, unlike you. The comment appeared to be directed at me, which is why I responded to it.

Anyway. The operation is available. I've seen a report on it from a serious tv-magazine over a year ago, so unless I'm travelling back in time, you're wrong.

Well there are plenty of articles that disagree, heres a couple more:Cytori Therapeutics - Cytori to Commercialize Stem Cell Therapy for Breast Reconstruction in Cancer Patients in Europe in Early 2008

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main...nbreast109.xml


So all those articles are wrong, an the "serious tv-magazine" you read over a year ago is right? Serious TV magazine! An I could link you to numerous plastic surgery clinics, that aren't supplying that treatment. If it was available, they'd all be using it by now.

Ehhh... I think you misunderstand the term "tv-magazine". You don't read, but watch them. It's not a magazine about TV shows or pop-culture, but a documentaristic reportage programme on a certain subject, e.g. "Nomads in South Africa", "Migration of working force due to globalisation in past 5 years", "Beauty operations and their effects on human body". As I've said, the treatment was described during the course of good 40 minutes, with the testimonials of the patients and remarks from doctors.

Ergo, you are either claiming that one of the most respectable public informants brought up a faulty report over the free-tv or that I'm lying about it myself. Which one is it?

Or... you're simply not very good at reading (which was exactly the case in your "vegetarians are just as good in bed as their fellows flesh-devourers"):

The process has been approved in Germany, which means it is legal across the European Union, the Chemistry and Industry magazine said.

Now, your claim that this sort of procedure doesn't exist is therefore false. It's simply not yet legalised in the UK yet, while the continentals have been practicing it for quite some time now.

Once again, I totally agree with Bunny. You will grab into words and bad formulations despite the fact that you've got a good list of articles, doctors, specialists, scientists and, most importantly, omniscient EOFFers telling you that you're wrong.

[No.78]

I'd be all "ZOMG" and then go pull straight guys

[blackmage_nuke]

Hit all those girls i wasnt alowed hurt to before

And hit some guys who cant hit me back while im at it

[Discord]

Hit all those girls i wasnt alowed hurt to before

And hit some guys who cant hit me back while im at it

That's quite a thought. =D

[Fonzie]

Hit all those girls i wasnt alowed hurt to before

And hit some guys who cant hit me back while im at it

That's quite a thought. =D

He reminds me of The Joker from batman...


Heath Ledger?!

[Momiji]

Hit all those girls i wasnt alowed hurt to before

And hit some guys who cant hit me back while im at it

Sounds like a plan to me.

[ShunNakamura]

<span style="color:#FFCCFF">

OOC:	@ the flat chested comment Thank goodness there are some that are flat/small chested, I would really dislike it if all women were large breasted[I personally don't see the attraction]

As for the topic, my guess is that I would just try and go about life normally. Though by all likelihood people I know would continuously bother me.... People can be sooo annoying. Really what is the problem if a guy you know suddenly turns into a girl? there is none, right?
</span>

[Peegee]

Probably date really hot lesbians. Mmmmm

Really, there's not much else to do. Probably get guys to pay for my living expenses. hot.

[Chimp]

If the surgeon does a horrible job, yes.

[strike]To YOU maybe. [/strike]

Yeah thats getting old...I know... :sweatdrop

To YOU maybe.

[Peegee]

"I would play with my new boobs and vagina for a few days, an then I would grow a beard."

[DK]

I can't be arsed to read all the arguing, I just want to put in that I think fake breasts are generally gross.

[Anaisa]

Your argument is based on the assumption that I have not experienced something you have. The fact of the matter is that I have felt fake breast, and I have felt natural ones as well. My argument was not with the texture or feel of the breasts themselves, but rather that appearance of them. You said they looked fake, and I am disagreeing with that matter. If the surgeon does a horrible job then they look horrible. Otherwise, they can look just as great, if not better, than natural ones.

Then that's even more hilarious. Fake breasts look nothing like real ones. You must have very poor eyesight.

I also wasn't making a comment towards the nature of the argument. My comment was directed towards the fact that you are one of those people who, despite all evidence that proves otherwise, refuses to give up your stance on any given subject during a debate because you have too much pride in yourself.

No, it's the other way round. I provide evidence, an disprove all your silly attempts at arguments, whilst you all make the same arguments that have already been proven wrong, ignore the proof, an then claim you all must be right because the majority is always right! An they always have no knowledge of what their talking about.

And just a little fyi, the word is "and".

Yet another person who's never heard of the word "an" an shows themselves up by trying to correct me, an claim it should be "and".

Middle English, short for and, and, from Old English;

Quote marks go around quotes. Never once did I say those words. Please stop assuming things in a feeble attempt to enhance your argument on an already ignorant subject.

It was an impersonation of you. Aww somebody is upset because they like breast implants an believe they look an feel like real breasts, when they don't. Poor poor you.

Ehhh... I think you misunderstand the term "tv-magazine". You don't read, but watch them.

I think you misunderstand it if you think it can't apply to both.

It's not a magazine about TV shows or pop-culture, but a documentaristic reportage programme on a certain subject, e.g. "Nomads in South Africa", "Migration of working force due to globalisation in past 5 years", "Beauty operations and their effects on human body". As I've said, the treatment was described during the course of good 40 minutes, with the testimonials of the patients and remarks from doctors.

Ergo, you are either claiming that one of the most respectable public informants brought up a faulty report over the free-tv or that I'm lying about it myself. Which one is it?

You're lying of course.

Or... you're simply not very good at reading (which was exactly the case in your "vegetarians are just as good in bed as their fellows flesh-devourers"):

More like the other way around. Heres my argument that wiped the floor with your lame attempts to get digs at vegetarians: BBC NEWS | Health | Sex drive warning to vegetarians and elderly Now look at this quote from that article on what affects sex hormones:

Dr Longcope and colleagues looked at globulin levels in 1,552 men aged between 40 and 70. Protein and fibre intake levels were significant contributors to sex hormone levels, as were age and body mass, they said in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism.

Fibre intake affects the sexs hormones too, now who is that eats more fibre in their diet, meat eaters or vegetarians?

Vegetarians have higher blood levels of beta-carotene. They consume more vitamin C, beta-carotene, indoles, and fiber than meat-eaters.

Taken from here:Cancer Project / Foods for Cancer PreventionThat article chose to overlook that vegetarians have a higher intake of fibre. I wonder why? An it's based on if a vegetarian lacks protein in their diet. They should have looked up whether vegetarians suffer from a lack of protein before making that claim:

Protein intakes of vegetarians are generally lower than those of non-vegetarians but still meet UK dietary recommendations. Jackson (1993) calculated the average intake of protein by vegetarians in the UK to be 57g/day, compared with 75g/day for non-vegetarians. Draper (1993) found protein intake in vegetarians to be 66g/day for men and 56g/day for women. UK recommendations are 55g/day for men and 45g/day for women.

Vegetarians eating a balanced diet obtain protein from a variety of food sources. This means essential amino acid requirements can be met by plant foods. The idea of combining proteins from different plant sources to provide all of the necessary essential amino acids is known as protein complementing. Previous emphasis on protein complementing has been overstated and it is now widely accepted that it is not something vegetarians eating a balanced diet need consider.

In fact, the lower protein intake of vegetarians may be beneficial as there is concern that high protein intake may be associated with health risks. Poor or failing kidney function may be aggravated and the loss of calcium from bones increased by excessive dietary protein. In both instances, animal protein appears to be more harmful than plant protein. A high intake of animal protein may also play a contributory role in raised blood pressure (Bursztyn, 1985).

And at least I'm interesting enough that people remember my arguments. I'd be hard pushed to think of any of your posts other than the ones I've read here.

The process has been approved in Germany, which means it is legal across the European Union, the Chemistry and Industry magazine said.
Now, your claim that this sort of procedure doesn't exist is therefore false. It's simply not yet legalised in the UK yet, while the continentals have been practicing it for quite some time now.

An I'm the one who doesn't read properly. Lets have a look at the full quote, rather than your cut short version:

The process has been approved in Germany, which means it is legal across the European Union, the Chemistry and Industry magazine said.

Clinicians will apparently have to wait until the trials end early in 2008 before they can recommend the procedure to patients.

If you're so familiar with my arguments, you'd know cutting quotes short to make it appear as if they agree with you, isn't going to escape my notice.

Once again, I totally agree with Bunny. You will grab into words and bad formulations despite the fact that you've got a good list of articles, doctors, specialists, scientists and, most importantly, omniscient EOFFers telling you that you're wrong.

Again:No, it's the other way round. I provide evidence, an disprove all your silly attempts at arguments, whilst you all make the same arguments that have already been proven wrong, ignore the proof, an then claim you all must be right because the majority is always right! An they always have no knowledge of what their talking about.

[bipper]

I think I made this topic a few months ago when I found out that briene had a fetus growing in him.

I would be stoked to have more kids. That would unfortunately mean I am stuck with some woman though. I doubt that will ever end up good.