Quote Originally Posted by [M] Del Murder View Post
You posted that if recruitment was in play then it had not been used yet. No if on the last part. That is very definite.
Remind me again how whether or not me using a definite proves that you're town. I would've thought that someone who is currently leading the lynch count would have more pressing issues to discuss.

Tell you what, though. I used a definite. I've used many, many definites in this thread. Hope that helps.
If people believe that you are pro-town for your suspicions of Shlupquack, then they should logically believe that I am pro-town for suspecting Azar.
I was the first person to suspect ShlupQuack, and I made the vote that got her lynched.

Your vote for Azar was the only vote for him that day. He wasn't under fire or suspicion at all. I suspect you voted for him purely so you could say "I voted for him! I'm not scum!" now, to be honest. Crucially, I don't think you voted for him yesterday when he actually was lynched.

Oh, and for someone who is apparently against the blind following of leaders, and is not so sure that certain people who I and others consider to be innocent are actually innocent, you have an odd way of showing it.
Can I propose a plan? If all of those who voted for Shlupquack on Day 2 can be trusted to be citizens, should they all continue to vote together? A concrete vote of 4 people sticking together is difficult to debate as treacherous if they find another mafia, correct?