Winamp is bloating Firefox somehow. :P

[snacks]

I just cba'd and downloaded a preconfigured look.

More scripting work is SERIOUS BUSINESS.

[Roto13]

Winamp plays music and doesn't eat up a bunch of memory. That's the only thing I care about. :P

[Mirage]

functionality, flexibility and configurability, because of it's nice titlescript scripting support :p Go with Winamp though if looking at the media player is more important or you don't have time/effort to spend on programming foobar or customising it's looks :p

Please elaborate on functionality and flexibility.

[o_O]

Foobar2000 is hands down the best audio player for any OS, which sucks because there is no Linux version and it's not stable under WINE. :{

It's functional because there basically exists a plugin for anything you could possibly want. From different UI engines to masstaggers to scrobblers to visualisations to plugins that watch your directories for file/folder updates. It's flexible because you can do anything you want to it. You can script crazy interfaces (like, real crazy ) using PanelsUI, awesome interfaces using ColumnsUI and even with the DefaultUI. You can format text and put your own text anywhere you like in the program: If you don't like artist names, then you don't have to put artist names anywhere; you can specify your own ID3v2 metadata and use it in your formatting. You could have an ID3v2 tag called "SARS", and then use the data in that tag in your playlist in place of the artist name. With the correct extensions it supports any audio format under the Sun.

I could go on for years.

EDIT: Forgot the real purpose of the post.
It's probably Fasterfox. The only extensions I'd use are Adblock and IE Tab (but that's my preference). It could be McAfee Site Advisor if it's accessing some large definitions file for every tab or something (which I wouldn't put past McAfee). Your extensions likely won't work out of the box with Firefox3, though some do.

[Serapy]

I use Opera, it uses less memory and it seems better :P Try using Opera with Winamp?

[rubah]

winamp always used a bunch (17mb?) of memory for me, but I did use winamp3 afterall.

[Roto13]

I think I figured out what extension is causing the problem. I have (or had) a Winamp toolbar in Firefox that I never really used. xP I uninstalled it yesterday and Firefox behaved itself last night.

Hooray!

[o_O]

winamp always used a bunch (17mb?) of memory for me, but I did use winamp3 afterall.

Allie, why would you do this? :ma<b></b>d2

[rubah]

because I had to have my multiple playlists in the playlist selector.

[Baloki]

*does things to Aliie?*

[crono_logical]

foobar2000 does multiple playlists Winamp3 is the most evil version of winamp there is, either go to 5, or back to 2.91 if you want to use less memory

[rubah]

it's cool, I use itunes now

[Yamaneko]

And you're complaining about high memory usage?

[Roto13]

iTunes is the devil. I won't even use it to put music on my iPod.

[rubah]

I wasn't complaining, infact I was using it inspite of >:[
I've got 4x the ram now and am using the native operating system, so it's not nearly as laggy as it was in windows xD