Interesting thing I found out recently

[MJN SEIFER]

Oh, so it's okay for you to bash people with meaningless (or pointless) comments such as "lulz my brain hurts, stop making up theories, you would be a nice guy if you didn't make up theories". Those comments wouldn't be pointless only if you have posted better information such as information that could disprove our theories. But no, you haven't done that, and you have been posting like that for a while as you did in other threads. I wasn't trying to be involved, but you got on my nerves eventually.

Yes, it's a forum with a variety of rules, which means, I think, that pointless comments are considered as spam.

its not like your theories help make humanity better

I don't get it. I made theories because I like to...?

I'm going to slightly agree here.

It's perfectly alright to do theories, really I find them very interesting, I have done some my self (not as detailed as others) and I have seen many from other people, some I agree with, some I do not. However, I try to be as polite as I can to the person who made them, so basically (and this is aimed at the so called "bashers") It's ok to put things like.

That sounds interesting, but there are parts I don't fully understand a few parts *Insert list here*

Or

Good therory, however I'm afraid I interpreted things differently, and a few things don't add up and sadly disprove your theory. Alow me to explain *insert explaination here*

Notice, how that example may have dissagreed with the theory, but didn't insult, offend, or "bash" in anyway (at least not intentionally).


However, it is NOT desirable to send replies like this:

D'u'd! Wot was taht?! I dint undastand a d@mn word!

or

Mannnn that was wierd, just make my head hurt!! Don't do that!!

Or the ever poular;

Hey!! That's a whole 45 secconds of my life waisted - GIVE THEM BACK!!

These replies, are pointless, not funny, and sometimes offensive to the people who wright the theories. It is ok to debate the theories as that is "freedom of speach" in my view, but the rest, probably does fall under a spam catagory.

Anyway, that is my view on the matter.

[NeoCracker]

Wait, what part of this is a theory?

He notices that the last boss things look like the GSL fossils.

Isn't that more of something kinda neat he noticed, and not a theory?

[rubah]

The theory was how they got there, I believe.

Guys, you can take the talk about what is appropriate to post where somewhere else.

[Future Esthar]

Í didn´t made any theory regarding this yet.
You convinced me.I am gonna post the pictures.

[Aerith's Knight]

lol i dont know all those monsters.. but if they monsters look like those bones then you have me convinced

[Future Esthar]

Didn´t you finish the game?

A few of these monsters don´t look alike the ones in the castle but I find they identities using extra logic.
The similar ones are Gargantua´s head,Tiamat(with little differences),Trauma and Krysta.But since these ones are here I think the others are here aswell.

Tri-point was created from a dragon meaning his skeleton his similar to a dinossaur.
Red Giant head resemble the head at the prison of the castle.
Catoplebas is a reptilian (similar to a lizard).It is not a primate like Red Giant and it is very different from Sphynx.
Therefore Sphynx will be the one that remains.

[Serapy]

There's a bone figure standing on the top of Ulti's castle gate, but I'm not sure if it means anything..

[Aerith's Knight]

Well actually.. the few times i completed the game.. which is three times.. i used a walkthrough for Ulti's castle and just kinda bashed my way through it.. not really caring who i strike down.

i thought the castle itself was a very weak part anyway

but ill take your word for the monsters

[Mirage]

Half of those skeletons don't really resemble the bosses at all.

[Future Esthar]

There is also the possibility that only some of the monsters of UC are here.And the rest are only regular monsters.But I don´t realy believe it.
I have the entire day free.I will post the pictures of the real monsters here.

[MJN SEIFER]

Hey, some of them do look pretty similar (though you have to observe on it a bit). Thanks for showing us.

I wonder if this was done on purpose? And if so, what for?

[The Last Oath]

If there is an equal number of skeletons to the same amount of monsters in the castle, meaning that there is not ONE extra or less skeleton to leave out a boss then your probably right.

[Future Esthar]

Here are the pictures of the bosses.














The next is Trauma




I realized there were some mistakes of mine.
Here are the corrections.






Sphinxara is the true form of Sphinx and he dies this way.But no one knows if this was also a mask put by a giant head.If you take a look at the external line you will see that it looks like the head in GSL.
In GSL we can see the shoulder horn of Red Giant.What we have here is a sideview.I also showed the boss in the same sideview.
The ???? means that I can´t figure that.I can´t meet Last Oath requirements.
Looking at Catoblepas circular head and crest I made my decision.
Now why I assigned Tri-point to that fossil?
Because it has two visible backbones, one with the head (oval) and the other crossing through it.This one most probably was covered by the upper "points" of Tripoint.The lower "point" is under the skeleton.

[Raebus]

I can't see the resemblances. The so called Tiamat in that picture looks more like a snake of sorts.

[Future Esthar]

It looks like the fish boss on the grotto in FF9.
Gisamaluke´s I believe.