Much of your "proof" seems to be misinterpretations or illogical assumptions. You also say that your theories must be true, because they can't be disproved. The fact is, you can't say if something is true if your only reason for saying that is that "it can't be disproved." Using your logic, one could say that a child's imaginary friend exists because "it can't be disproved."All what I can say is that why don't you disprove R=U and my theories? I'd love to see information that could disprove em
Seriously, if you want to argue about something, you need real proof.
And I'm pretty sure Square themselves also say that R=U is false. There's an obvious fact that can disprove your theories.



